The literature highlights the importance of insect consumption for nutritional health habits. The increasingly clear legislation, the developed studies demonstrating their nutritional value, and the prospect of overcoming some barriers that have prevented consumers from consuming insects are among the reasons supporting the advantages of consuming insects. The leading determinants of consumption are culture and individual and social beliefs, accessibility to a particular nutritional resource, and individual behavior. The barriers to neophobia were analyzed by evaluating factors of influence and their respective relationship and meaning through quantitative research to measure the significance of the results. To develop a conceptual model that aims to change eating behavior and recognize structural aspects that can be barriers in the process of changing eating behavior, a methodological framework was developed. The methodological framework aimed to identify the characteristics that can be associated with the profile of opinion leaders, and it included a questionnaire which was applied to 213 young people. Moreover, the structural equation model was the statistical technique used. Given the projected population growth and increasing life expectancy, nutrition is a challenge in terms of health, but also in economic, social, and environmental respects. Aiming for sustainability, it is crucial to identify nutritional alternatives within the circular economy.

Community disaster resilience is increasingly guiding risk-reduction investments, but in many Southeast European settings, comparable subnational data remain scarce. This study assesses perceived community disaster resilience across Serbia by combining BRIC–DROP dimensions into a single index and analyzing differences across hazard types and sociodemographic factors. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted using multistage random sampling and the “next birthday” method for respondent selection. The final sample included 1200 adults from 22 local government units across four regions: Belgrade, Vojvodina, Šumadija & Western Serbia, and Southern & Eastern Serbia. Participants evaluated preventive measures and societal resilience for ten hazard types and considered five social dimensions: social structure, social capital, social mechanisms, social equity/diversity, and social beliefs. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses (including Pearson correlations, t-tests, and ANOVA), and multiple linear regression identified key predictors of preventive behavior and perceived resilience. Composite scores highlighted spatial resilience differences. Overall perceptions were generally low, mostly falling below the midpoint of the scale. Furthermore, the highest ratings for implemented preventive measures were recorded for pandemics/epidemics, storms/hail, and floods, whereas the lowest were observed for environmental pollution and droughts. Perceived resilience was highest for snowstorms, storms/hail, and pandemics/epidemics, and lowest for environmental pollution and droughts. Also, respondents reported relatively strong family ties and favorable perceptions of communication and access to basic supplies, but weak institutional capacity, particularly in budget allocation, early warning and public notification, rapid decision-making, and evacuation and shelter readiness. Regression results were statistically significant but explained only a small portion of the variance. Age and public-sector employment positively predicted perceived resilience; fear, income, and, to a lesser extent, education were negatively associated. These findings highlight the structural and psychosocial factors that shape perceptions of resilience. The BRIC–DROP composite indicates generally low perceived preparedness and resilience, especially in risk communication, evacuation and shelter readiness, and financing—the key bottlenecks in strengthening local resilience. The results recommend combining institutional reform with targeted risk communication to reduce fear and build trust, especially focusing on hazard areas with the lowest confidence, such as environmental pollution and drought.

Background: The research objective of the study is to determine the differences in the manifestation of the motor status of normally fed preschool test subjects, classified into groups according to foot status. Methods: This is a simple, comparative observational study. Preschool children included in this study have been subjected to anthropometric measurements in order to determine BMI, tests for motor skills assessment (running at 20 m from a high start, standing broad jump, backwards polygon, rectangular seated forward bend, plate tapping, sit-ups for 60 s, and bent arm hang), and a determination of foot status. The total sample was comprised of 202 test subjects who attended a regular sports program, aged 3.9 to 6.5 years of decimal age (M = 141; Age = 5.3 ± 0.74; Height = 117.3 ± 7.1; Weight = 22 ± 3.7; F = 61; Age = 5.1 ± 0.73; Height = 114.9 ± 7.4; Weight = 21.2 ± 3.8), of which 153 (75.7%) were normally fed, 6 (3%) were undernourished, 30 were overweight (14.9%), and 13 were obese (6.4%). Results: In the total sample, 30 (14.9%) subjects had normal arch feet, 90 (44.6%) high arched feet, and 41 (20.3%) flat feet. We found 41 (20.3%) subjects who had different left and right foot statuses within this sample. The data were processed by means of nonparametric tests (the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests) at a significance level p ≤ 0.05. Conclusion: The results show that there is a statistically significant difference between groups of subjects with different foot statuses in the manifestation of motor status in most tests, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.01, and in tests of sit-ups for 60 s and the bent arm hang, there is a statistically significant difference, the level of which is p ≤ 0.05. It is only in the inclination test of rectangular seated forward bend that no statistically significant difference was displayed.

Infectious diseases remain a major global health concern, with a growing burden of antimicrobial resistance and consequent higher mortality in the human population. Accurate bacterial identification is fundamental across clinical, veterinary, agricultural, and research settings, supporting effective diagnosis, antimicrobial stewardship, infection control, food safety, and environmental monitoring; however, conventional approaches are limited by time constraints, reduced sensitivity, and challenges in detecting fastidious or uncultivable organisms. This review provides a comprehensive overview of classical and advanced methods, including microscopy, culture, biochemical testing, immunological and serological assays, proteomic and spectroscopy-based techniques, and molecular approaches, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), digital PCR, DNA hybridization, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and metagenomics. The integration of artificial intelligence has further enhanced analytical performance. Nevertheless, harmonization of bioinformatics frameworks remains essential, as variability in algorithm-defined cut-off values limits standardized implementation of whole-genome sequencing in routine laboratories. Emerging technologies, including CRISPR-based diagnostics and phage- and nanomaterial-based detection systems, offer promising alternatives. Overall, the integration of these approaches is expected to improve the accuracy, speed, and applicability of bacterial identification across diverse settings; however, these advances should be implemented cautiously, with standardization remaining a key priority alongside technological modernization.

Community disaster resilience is increasingly guiding risk-reduction investments, but in many Southeast European settings, comparable subnational data remain scarce. This study develops and tests a predictive model of perceived community disaster resilience across Serbia by combining BRIC–DROP dimensions into a single index and analyzing differences across hazard types and sociodemographic factors. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted using multistage random sampling and the “next birthday” method for respondent selection. The final sample included 1, 1,200 adults from 22 local government units across four regions: Belgrade, Vojvodina, Šumadija & Western Serbia, and Southern & Eastern Serbia. Participants evaluated preventive measures and societal resilience for ten hazard types and considered five social dimensions: social structure, social capital, social mechanisms, social equity/diversity, and social beliefs. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses (including Pearson correlations, t- tests, and ANOVA), and multiple linear regression identified key predictors of preventive behavior and perceived resilience. Composite scores highlighted spatial resilience differences. Overall perceptions mostly fell below the midpoint, with the highest ratings for pandemic/epidemic preparedness (M = 2. 32), storms/hail (M = 2. 24), and floods (M = 2. 15). The lowest ratings were for environmental pollution (M = 1. 81) and droughts (M = 1. 87). Perceived societal resilience was highest for snowstorms (M = 2. 30), storms/hail (M = 2. 28), and pandemics/epidemics (M = 2. 26), and lowest for environmental pollution (M = 1. 91) and droughts (M = 1.87. 98). Respondents reported strong family ties (M = 3. 05) and good communication and supply access (e. g., communication tools M = 3. 19; water/food access M = 3. 07), but weak institutional capacity, especially in areas like budget allocation (M = 1. 84), early warning/public notifications (M = 2. 11), rapid decision- making without bureaucracy (M = 2. 08), and evacuation/shelter capacity (M = 2. 12). Regression results were statistically significant but explained only a small portion of variance (perceived resilience R² = 0. 051; preventive measures R² = 0. 060). Age and employment in the public sector positively predicted perceived resilience; fear, income, and, to a lesser extent, education showed negative associations. These findings highlight the structural and psychosocial factors that shape perceptions of resilience. The BRIC–DROP composite indicates generally low perceived preparedness and resilience, especially in risk communication, evacuation and shelter readiness, and financing—the key bottlenecks in strengthening local resilience. The results recommend combining institutional reform with targeted risk communication to reduce fear and build trust, especially focusing on hazard areas with the lowest confidence, such as environmental pollution and drought.

The paper prepared in the form of a book review is a review of the book written by the authors Peter Lacy, Jessica Long and Wesley Spindler. The book is entitled "The Circular Economy Handbook, Realizing the Circular Advantage". The book was published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2020. Apart from their academic background, the authors of the book are world-acknowledged experts experienced in leading the world's largest circular economy and sustainability strategy programs and studies, advising the senior leaders of the Fortune 500 companies and public organizations towards zero-waste policies and the circular economy. The book was written as a support to the effort made by the World Economic Forum, the Forum of Young Global Leaders, the Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE) in the development of the circular economy and the forewords in the book were written by PACE's C.E.O. and other program co-founders and the world-known thought leaders in those specialized fields.