Diana Suhardiman

Diana Suhardiman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 March 2018 in Antipode
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMiles Kenney‐Lazar
Miles Kenney‐Lazar
DSDiana Suhardiman
Diana Suhardiman
MDMichael B. Dwyer
Michael B. Dwyer

17 November 2020 in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDiana Suhardiman
Diana Suhardiman
JRJonathan Rigg
Jonathan Rigg
MBMarcel Bandur
Marcel Bandur
MMMelissa Marschke
Melissa Marschke
MMMichelle Ann Miller
Michelle Ann Miller
DTDavid Taylor
David Taylor
Positioning migrants as quintessential globalisation subjects, this paper reveals how the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the ambivalent positioning of migration as a pathway for human development. Drawing on interviews with international and domestic labour migrants from Bangladesh, India, Laos and Myanmar working in Laos, Myanmar, China, Singapore and Thailand, the paper explores the vulnerabilities, challenges and opportunities that have come with migration and how these have been reconfigured as the pandemic has progressed, disproportionately heightening migrants’ exposure to the virus and their socioeconomic precarity. Through their personal stories, the paper provides insights into the evolving livelihood pathways of migrant workers during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, their (changing) views of migration as a route to progress, and tentatively sets out how ruptures caused by the pandemic may lead to a re-thinking of livelihood pathways for such men and women and their families.

1 June 2012 in Society & Natural Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDiana Suhardiman
Diana Suhardiman
MGMark Giordano
Mark Giordano
FMFrançois Molle
François Molle
This article provides an institutional analysis of the Mekong River Commission and brings to light the institutional dissonances between regional and national decision-making landscapes in the Lower Mekong Basin. The current scalar disconnect between regional and national decision-making processes reflects how international donors and member country representatives obscure potential conflict/tension in transboundary water governance in the Mekong. From a scholarly perspective, it questions academic approaches that assume that the state is the sole or primary actor in international relations.

1 January 2022 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBlake D. Ratner
Blake D. Ratner
ALAnne Margaret Larson
Anne Margaret Larson
JBJuan Pablo Sarmiento Barletti
Juan Pablo Sarmiento Barletti
HEHagar ElDidi
Hagar ElDidi
DCDelia Catacutan
Delia Catacutan
RMRuth Meinzen-Dick
Ruth Meinzen-Dick
Ratner, B. D., A. M. Larson, J. Sarmiento Barletti, H. ElDidi, D. Catacutan, F. Flintan, D. Suhardiman, T. Falk, and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2022. Multistakeholder platforms for natural resource governance: lessons from eight landscape-level cases. Ecology and Society 27(2):2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13168-270202

13 March 2015 in International Journal of Water Resources Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDiana Suhardiman
Diana Suhardiman
FCFloriane Clement
Floriane Clement
LBLuna Bharati
Luna Bharati
Integrated water resources management (IWRM) has been prescribed in the global water policy literature for decades. This article looks at how the concept has been applied in Nepal. It highlights the normative approach in IWRM policy formulation, the existing institutional barriers to apply it and how these resulted in the framing of IWRM ‘implementation’ as merely a compilation of donor-funded projects. Current discourse on IWRM highlights the need to shift the emphasis from national policy formulation to local adaptive, pragmatic approaches to IWRM. This article brings to light the need to identify potential entry points to scale up locally rooted water management approaches towards the development of nested institutional set-ups in water resources management.

1 March 2014 in International Journal of Water Governance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChu Thai Hoanh
Chu Thai Hoanh
DSDiana Suhardiman
Diana Suhardiman
TLTuan Anh Le
Tuan Anh Le
Vietnam’s irrigation development policy directions are divided between the objective to continue increasing rice production through agricultural intensification and to improve farmer’s livelihoods through crop diversification and integrated farming. While the first objective requires the construction of new large-scale irrigation system in deeply flooded area of the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta, the latter demands the modification in management of existing irrigation physical infrastructure for non-rice crops, in particular brackish aquaculture in the coastal zones. This article looks at Vietnam’s irrigation policy formulation processes in the last three and half decades in relation to the idea of polycentric governance. It discusses the current shortcomings and potential role of polycentric governance networks to capture stakeholders’ interests at multiple governance levels essential for future policy development. It partially sheds light on the dark side of water governance, bringing to light the fragmented polycentric decision-making processes in Vietnam’s irrigation development policies