Trisha L. Dunning

Trisha L. Dunning


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 January 2012 in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKiran Manya
Kiran Manya
BCBernard Champion
Bernard Champion
Trisha L. DunningTrisha L. Dunning
Trisha L. Dunning
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in patients with chronic disease such as diabetes mellitus. The primary objective of the study was to determine the overall prevalence and type of CAM use in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) in Western Sydney and to compare the prevalence and factors associated with CAM use with the literature.

17 October 2008 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJohn Furler
John Furler
CWChristine Walker
Christine Walker
IBIrene Darmadi Blackberry
Irene Darmadi Blackberry
Trisha L. DunningTrisha L. Dunning
Trisha L. Dunning
NSNabil Sulaiman
Nabil Sulaiman
DYDoris Young
Doris Young
Support for patient self-management is an accepted role for health professionals. Little evidence exists on the appropriate basis for the role of health professionals in achieving optimum self-management outcomes. This study explores the perceptions of people with type 2 diabetes about their self-management strategies and how relationships with health professionals may support this.

23 November 2013 in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBodil Rasmussen
Bodil Rasmussen
CHChristel Hendrieckx
Christel Hendrieckx
BCBrydie Clarke
Brydie Clarke
MBMari Botti
Mari Botti
Trisha L. DunningTrisha L. Dunning
Trisha L. Dunning
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight
Life transitions often involve complex decisions, challenges and changes that affect diabetes management. Transition to motherhood is a major life event accompanied by increased risk that the pregnancy will lead to or accelerate existing diabetes-related complications, as well as risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, all of which inevitably increase anxiety. The frequency of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia often increases during pregnancy, which causes concern for the health and physical well-being of the mother and unborn child. This review aimed to examine the experiences of women with T1DM focusing on the pregnancy and postnatal phases of their transition to motherhood.

27 February 2013 in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBodil Rasmussen
Bodil Rasmussen
Trisha L. DunningTrisha L. Dunning
Trisha L. Dunning
CHChristel Hendrieckx
Christel Hendrieckx
MBMari Botti
Mari Botti
JSJane Speight
Jane Speight
Life transitions are associated with high levels of stress affecting health behaviours among people with Type 1 diabetes. Transition to motherhood is a major transition with potential complications accelerated by pregnancy with risks of adverse childbirth outcomes and added anxiety and worries about pregnancy outcomes. Further, preparing and going through pregnancy requires vigilant attention to a diabetes management regimen and detailed planning of everyday activities with added stress on women. Psychological and social well-being during and after pregnancy are integral for good pregnancy outcomes for both mother and baby. The aim of this study is to establish the face and content validity of two novel measures assessing the well-being of women with type 1 diabetes in their transition to motherhood, 1) during pregnancy and 2) during the postnatal period.

6 September 2019 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCStephanie P. Cowdery
Stephanie P. Cowdery
MSMuhammad A. Sajjad
Muhammad A. Sajjad
KHKara Holloway
Kara Holloway
Mohammadreza MohebbiMohammadreza Mohebbi
Mohammadreza Mohebbi
LWLana J. Williams
Lana J. Williams
JPJulie Pasco
Julie Pasco
Cancer is a leading burden of disease in Australia and worldwide, with incidence rates varying with age, sex and geographic location. As part of the Ageing, Chronic Disease and Injury study, we aimed to map the incidence rates of primary cancer diagnoses across western Victoria and investigate the association of age, accessibility/remoteness index of Australia (ARIA) and area-level socioeconomic status (SES) with cancer incidence. Data on cancer incidence in the study region were extracted from the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) for men and women aged 40+ years during 2010–2013, inclusive. The age-adjusted incidence rates (per 10,000 population/year), as well as specific incidence for breast, prostate, lung, bowel and melanoma cancers, were calculated for the entire region and for the 21 Local Government Areas (LGA) that make up the whole region. The association of aggregated age, ARIA and SES with cancer incidence rates across LGAs was determined using Poisson regression. Overall, 15,120 cancer cases were identified; 8218 (54%) men and 6902 women. For men, the age-standardised rate of cancer incidence for the whole region was 182.1 per 10,000 population/year (95% CI 177.7–186.5) and for women, 162.2 (95% CI: 157.9–166.5). The incidence of cancer (overall) increased with increasing age for men and women. Geographical variations in cancer incidence were also observed across the LGAs, with differences identified between men and women. Residents of socioeconomically disadvantaged and less accessible areas had higher cancer incidence (p < 0.001). Cancer incidence rates varied by age, sex, across LGAs and with ARIA. These findings not only provide an evidence base for identifying gaps and assessing the need for services and resource allocation across this region, but also informs policy and assists health service planning and implementation of preventative intervention strategies to reduce the incidence of cancer across western Victoria. This study also provides a model for further research across other geographical locations with policy and clinical practice implications, both nationally and internationally.

4 November 2015 in Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJanet Harris
Janet Harris
MGMarit Graue
Marit Graue
Trisha L. DunningTrisha L. Dunning
Trisha L. Dunning
JHJohannes Haltbakk
Johannes Haltbakk
GAGunhild Austrheim
Gunhild Austrheim
MKMarit Kirkevold
Marit Kirkevold
Patient and public involvement in diabetes research is now actively encouraged in different countries because it is believed that involving people with experience of the condition will improve the quality and relevance of the research. However, reviews of patient involvement have noted that inadequate resources, patients’ and communities’ lack of research knowledge, and researchers’ lack of skills to involve patients and communities in research may present significant contextual barriers. Little is known about the extent of patient/community involvement in designing or delivering interventions for people with diabetes. A realist review of involvement will contribute to assessing when, how and why involvement works, or does not work, to produce better diabetes interventions. This protocol outlines the process for conducting a realist review to map how patients and the public have been involved in diabetes research to date. The review questions ask the following: How have people with diabetes and the wider community been involved in diabetes research? What are the characteristics of the process that appear to explain the relative success or failure of involvement? How has involvement (or lack of involvement) in diabetes research influenced the development and conduct of diabetes research? The degree of support in the surrounding context will be assessed alongside the ways in which people interact in different settings to identify patterns of interaction between context, mechanisms and outcomes in different research projects. The level and extent of the involvement will be described for each stage of the research project. The descriptions will be critically reviewed by the people with diabetes on our review team. In addition, researchers and patients in diabetes research will be asked to comment. Information from researcher-patient experiences and documents will be compared to theories of involvement across a range of disciplines to create a mid-range theory describing how involvement (or lack of involvement) in diabetes research influences the development and conduct of diabetes research.