In this study, 28 climate models from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and 32 models from the sixth phase (CMIP6) have been evaluated for their ability to simulate large‐scale atmospheric circulations (using rainfall, wind fields, geopotential height, temperature, and moisture flux convergence) for the summer monsoon in Southeast Asia. Using a multi‐criteria decision making technique, models have been ranked based on 25 metrics which compare their performances with observation data. Results indicate a better representation of annual rainfall cycles as well as spatial pattern by CMIP6 models compared to CMIP5. Though majority of the models from both CMIPs show late onset and early retreat of the rainy season, CMIP6 GCMs simulate the onset, retreat, and the length of the rainy season closer to the observation. Large‐scale circulation patterns evaluated using spatial correlation and root mean square error (RMSE) show improvements in CMIP6 across all metrics, especially for the moisture flux convergence. Performances for large‐scale circulation are generally reflected in rainfall simulation; however, few models showed that better simulations of rainfall do not exclusively depend on their performance for large‐scale variables. Overall, CMIP6 models are found to be superior to CMIP5 models in simulating rainfall and large‐scale circulation, which is likely attributable to CMIP6 model's higher spatial resolutions, increased number of vertical levels, improved atmospheric and land surface parameterization, etc. Finally, subsets of optimal models from CMIP5 and CMIP6 that proved to be better at representing the summer monsoons in the study area are identified. These models are recommended to develop robust future projections that can be used for climate change impact and adaptation studies.

Water security is a global concern because of the growing impact of human activities and climate change on water resources. Studies had been performed at global, country, and city level to assess the water security issues. However, assessment of water security at a domestic scale is lacking. This paper develops a new domestic water security assessment framework accounting for water supply, sanitation, and hygiene through twelve indicators. Water supply, sanitation, and hygiene are central to key water-related sustainable development goals. The framework is subsequently applied to the city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. From the domestic water security assessment of Addis Ababa, the water supply dimension was found to be of good level, whereas the sanitation and hygiene dimensions were of poor and fair level, respectively, indicating both a challenge and an opportunity for development. Because the analysis is spatially explicit at the city-branch level (in Addis), variation in domestic water security performance across Addis Ababa can be assessed, allowing efficient targeting of scant resources (financial, technical, personnel). Analysis further shows that a lack of institutional capacity within the utility, existing infrastructure leading to ‘lock-in’ and hindering maintenance and upgrade initiatives, and an unreliable power supply are the main issues leading to poor domestic water security in the study city. These areas should be tackled to improve the current situation and mitigate future problems. The developed framework is generic enough to be applied to other urban and peri-urban areas, yet provides planners and policy makers with specific information on domestic water security considering water supply, sanitation and hygiene, and accounting for within-city variability. This work could therefore have practical applicability for water service providers.