The purpose of this review is to examine various assessment methods in order to compare the accuracy between the virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions. In this review, comparison methods using pre- and post-operative computed topography (CT) data and digital impressions for definitive prosthesis will be described. The method for the displacement and strain for quantification of the error will also be explored. The difference between the planned and the actual implant placement position in guided implant surgery is expressed as an error. Assessing the accuracy of implant-guided surgery can play an important role as positive feedback in order to reduce errors. All of the assessment methods have their own inevitable errors and require careful interpretation in evaluation.

Jungwon Lee, DDS, MS/Jun-Beom Lee, DDS, MS/Ki-Tae Koo, DDS, PhD/Yang-Jo Seol, DDS, PhD/Yong-Moo Lee, DDS, PhD: Purpose: This systematic review aimed to identify the effects of certain flap management procedures on ridge preservation on the basis of existing literature. Materials and Methods: Electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials) and manual searches of the literature were conducted until February 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and prospective cohort studies that involved at least 10 subjects were eligible for this systematic review. To evaluate the beneficial effects of flap management on ridge preservation, changes in the bone width, bone height, and keratinized gingiva width were calculated using a random effects model. Results: Eleven studies (nine RCTs and two CCTs) were included in this review. No statistically significant differences in bone width and height changes were identified between the flapped and flapless ridge preservation techniques and between the free gingival graft and flapless ridge preservation techniques. A statistically significant shrinkage in keratinized gingiva width was noted with flapped ridge preservation compared with flapless ridge preservation (weighted mean differences, −3.21 mm; 95% confidence interval, −4.10 to −2.33; P < .00001; heterogeneity, 51%; χ², 0.15). Conclusion: Within the limitations, this review reveals that flapless ridge preservation was more effective in preserving bone width, bone height, and keratinized gingiva width. To present pertinent evidence regarding which flap management should be recommended for ridge preservation, more controlled and high-quality studies are warranted.

A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of ex vivo samples in comparison with a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) device. Six implant beds were prepared in porcine ribs using 3 different drilling protocols to simulate various implant stability conditions. Thirty-six pork ribs and 216 bone-level implants measuring 10 mm in height were used. The implant beds were prepared using 1 of the following 3 drilling protocols: 10-mm drilling depth with a 3.5-mm-diameter twist drill, 5-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill, and 10-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill. The first 108 implants were external-connection implants 4.0 mm in diameter, while the other 108 implants were internal-connection implants 4.3 mm in diameter. The peak insertion torque (PIT) during implant placement, the stability values obtained with DCA and RFA devices after implant placement, and the peak removal torque (PRT) during implant removal were measured. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) results obtained using the RFA device at the medial, distal, ventral, and dorsal points were 0.997, 0.994, 0.994, and 0.998, respectively. The ICCs of the implant stability test (IST) results obtained using the DCA device at the corresponding locations were 0.972, 0.975, 0.974, and 0.976, respectively. Logarithmic relationships between PIT and IST, PIT and ISQ, PRT and IST, and PRT and ISQ were observed. The mean absolute difference between the ISQ and IST values on a Bland-Altman plot was -6.76 (-25.05 to 11.53, P<0.05). Within the limits of ex vivo studies, measurements made using the RFA and DCA devices were found to be correlated under a variety of stability conditions.