Parinaz Seifollahzadeh

Dr. Parinaz Seifollahzadeh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 August 2026 in Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSParinaz Seifollahzadeh
Parinaz Seifollahzadeh
BRBettina Rutrecht
Bettina Rutrecht
Stefanie LesiakStefanie Lesiak
Stefanie Lesiak
LLLalropuia Lalropuia
Lalropuia Lalropuia
SSStephan Stuhr
Stephan Stuhr
Roland PombergerRoland Pomberger
Roland Pomberger
Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) remains challenging due to high energy requirements, losses of key elements like lithium, and the heterogeneity of waste streams arising from different cathode chemistries. This study evaluates multiple recycling methods for LIBs black mass (BM), to recover critical raw materials and other valuable components. Three types of BM including nickel–manganese–cobalt (NMC), lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and a heterogeneous mixture of cell phones and laptops (HL; German: Handy/Laptops), were treated using froth flotation, pyrometallurgy, and biohydrometallurgy and their respective recovery efficiencies were assessed. The flotation results revealed that the HL sample had the lowest mis-recovery of non-ferrous metals into the froth product (around 10%), leading to further flotation only for HL. During screening, 94–99% of iron, phosphorus, and carbon in LFP-type BM were recovered in the fine fraction (<45 µm), while 92–99% of lithium, cobalt, manganese, nickel, and carbon in NMC-type BM were recovered in the same fraction. During precipitation, 99% of iron and 100% of phosphorus were recovered from LFP bioleachates at pH 3, while ~97–100% of dissolved cobalt, manganese, and nickel were recovered from NMC bioleachates. These findings confirm that no single recycling method is optimal for all battery chemistries.