Background: The gut microbiota constitutes a metabolically active “second genome” that profoundly modulates drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and adverse reaction profiles. Beyond antibiotics, widely prescribed non-antibiotic pharmacotherapies exert clinically relevant pharmacomicrobiomic effects with implications for therapeutic optimisation and pharmacovigilance. Methods: This narrative review, conducted following PRISMA 2020 reporting principles (without PROSPERO pre-registration), searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (January 2015–December 2024) for evidence on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), metformin, NSAIDs, statins, SGLT2 inhibitors, and oral iron. Evidence tables included clinical human studies with molecular microbiota characterisation (16S rRNA or shotgun metagenomics), ≥20 participants, and a control arm; preclinical data informed mechanistic synthesis. Results: Of 68 eligible studies, 20 met criteria for the evidence tables. PPIs significantly remodelled gut microbiota composition with enrichment of oral-origin taxa (“oralisation of the gut”), associating with Clostridioides difficile infection and SIBO. Metformin enriched Akkermansia muciniphila and butyrate producers, contributing causally to glycaemic efficacy. NSAIDs compromised barrier integrity, with synergistic dysbiosis under PPI co-prescription. Statins correlated with reduced prevalence of the dysbiotic Bact2 enterotype. SGLT2 inhibitor data remained discordant. Oral iron consistently enriched Enterobacteriaceae at the expense of beneficial commensals.

Background: Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid present in Berberis spp., Coptis chinensis and Hydrastis canadensis, is among the most widely consumed metabolic-health supplements, popularized as “nature’s Ozempic”. Concurrent, often undisclosed use with prescription drugs is common in older adults, yet berberine is far from inert. Objective: To synthesize the evidence on berberine as a perpetrator of supplement–drug interactions, propose a four-axis mechanistic taxonomy, with product quality treated separately as a modifier of exposure rather than as a mechanism, and derive a clinically actionable risk-stratification framework. Methods: Structured narrative review, prepared per the SANRA quality criteria; PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase were searched up to May 2026. Results: Despite very low systemic exposure (oral bioavailability 0.68% in rats; low ng/mL plasma concentrations in humans), high luminal, enterocytic and hepatic concentrations generate interaction liability, documented in humans for a few pairs and mechanistic for most, along four mechanistic axes: inhibition, and transcriptional induction, of CYP3A4, with CYP2D6/CYP2C9 inhibition that is quasi-irreversible through a metabolite-intermediate complex; transporter modulation (P-glycoprotein, OCT1/OCT2, and MATE1); pharmacodynamic additivity (hypoglycemia, hypotension, and QT prolongation); and microbiome- and gut-barrier-mediated effects, the last of these being a candidate axis rather than a demonstrated one. Product-quality variability is treated separately, as a modifier of exposure. The clinical anchor is increased cyclosporine exposure in renal-transplant recipients (AUC +34.5%; trough 29.3% above control). These elements are integrated into a three-tier risk-stratification framework that combines perpetrator potency, victim-drug vulnerability, and patient vulnerability, with each tier being linked to a defined pharmacy action. Conclusions: In patients on multiple medications, and particularly when berberine is co-administered with drugs of narrow therapeutic index, it should be managed as an active pharmacological perpetrator rather than as an inert supplement. Unstandardized product quality and an unsettled European regulatory framework, under which national limits differ by more than an order of magnitude, further widen the uncertainty around the dose actually delivered. Berberine use should therefore be elicited routinely at medication reconciliation and stratified by mechanism, by victim-drug vulnerability, and by patient risk, with particular attention to metabolic self-medication in the GLP-1 era.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae are an increasing challenge in pediatric practice due to the combined effects of biofilm formation, multidrug resistance (MDR), and limited therapeutic options for children. Biofilm development promotes bacterial persistence by impairing antibiotic penetration, enabling metabolic adaptation, promoting persister-cell formation, facilitating horizontal gene transfer (HGT), and inducing stress-induced mutagenesis, thereby reducing the effectiveness of conventional antimicrobial therapy. These mechanisms are further compounded by pediatric-specific challenges, including age-dependent pharmacokinetic variability, congenital urinary tract abnormalities, device-associated infections, and the limited availability of validated diagnostic tools for biofilm-associated infections. This narrative review integrates current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying biofilm-mediated antimicrobial resistance with the unique diagnostic, pharmacological, and therapeutic challenges encountered in pediatric patients with K. pneumoniae UTIs. Emerging therapeutic strategies, such as optimized antibiotic combination therapy, bacteriophages, biofilm matrix-degrading enzymes, quorum-sensing inhibitors (QSIs), antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), and microbiome-directed approaches are critically evaluated with particular emphasis on their potential applicability in children. Although several anti-biofilm strategies have demonstrated encouraging results in experimental models, robust pediatric clinical evidence remains scarce. Current international guidelines continue to rely primarily on planktonic antimicrobial susceptibility testing without addressing biofilm-specific therapeutic considerations. In the absence of validated biofilm diagnostics, catheter stewardship and dosing optimization remain the most defensible clinical interventions available today. Broader translation of anti-biofilm strategies into pediatric practice will require dedicated pharmacokinetic studies, standardized biofilm diagnostics, and prospective clinical trials.