Matthew Forister

Prof. Matthew Forister


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 January 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDavid L. Wagner
David L. Wagner
EGEliza M. Grames
Eliza M. Grames
MFMatthew Forister
Matthew Forister
MBMay Berenbaum
May Berenbaum
DSDavid Stopak
David Stopak

29 December 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMatthew Forister
Matthew Forister
VNVojtech Novotny
Vojtech Novotny
APAnna K. Panorska
Anna K. Panorska
LBLeontine Baje
Leontine Baje
YBYves Basset
Yves Basset
LDLee A. Dyer
Lee A. Dyer
Significance: Dietary specialization determines an organism’s resource base as well as impacts on host or prey species. There are important basic and applied reasons to ask why some animals have narrow diets and others are more generalized, and if different regions of the Earth support more specialized interactions. We investigated site-specific host records for more than 7,500 species of insect herbivores. Although host specialists predominate, the proportion of specialists is affected by the diversity of hosts and shifts globally, supporting predictions of more exclusive tropical interactions. These results not only affect our understanding of the ecology of food webs, but also have implications for how they respond to environmental change, as well as for ecosystem management and restoration.

7 November 2022 in Ecological Monographs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJeffrey Harvey
Jeffrey Harvey
KTKévin Tougeron
Kévin Tougeron
RGRieta Gols
Rieta Gols
RHRobin Heinen
Robin Heinen
MAMariana Abarca
Mariana Abarca
SCSteven L. Chown
Steven L. Chown
Climate warming is considered to be among the most serious of anthropogenic stresses to the environment, because it not only has direct effects on biodiversity, but it also exacerbates the harmful effects of other human‐mediated threats. The associated consequences are potentially severe, particularly in terms of threats to species preservation, as well as in the preservation of an array of ecosystem services provided by biodiversity. Among the most affected groups of animals are insects—central components of many ecosystems—for which climate change has pervasive effects from individuals to communities. In this contribution to the scientists' warning series, we summarize the effect of the gradual global surface temperature increase on insects, in terms of physiology, behavior, phenology, distribution, and species interactions, as well as the effect of increased frequency and duration of extreme events such as hot and cold spells, fires, droughts, and floods on these parameters. We warn that, if no action is taken to better understand and reduce the action of climate change on insects, we will drastically reduce our ability to build a sustainable future based on healthy, functional ecosystems. We discuss perspectives on relevant ways to conserve insects in the face of climate change, and we offer several key recommendations on management approaches that can be adopted, on policies that should be pursued, and on the involvement of the general public in the protection effort.

11 January 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CHChristopher A. Halsch
Christopher A. Halsch
ASArthur M. Shapiro
Arthur M. Shapiro
JFJames A. Fordyce
James A. Fordyce
CNChris C. Nice
Chris C. Nice
JTJames Thorne
James Thorne
MFMatthew Forister
Matthew Forister
Insects have diversified through more than 450 million y of Earth’s changeable climate, yet rapidly shifting patterns of temperature and precipitation now pose novel challenges as they combine with decades of other anthropogenic stressors including the conversion and degradation of land. Here, we consider how insects are responding to recent climate change while summarizing the literature on long-term monitoring of insect populations in the context of climatic fluctuations. Results to date suggest that climate change impacts on insects have the potential to be considerable, even when compared with changes in land use. The importance of climate is illustrated with a case study from the butterflies of Northern California, where we find that population declines have been severe in high-elevation areas removed from the most immediate effects of habitat loss. These results shed light on the complexity of montane-adapted insects responding to changing abiotic conditions. We also consider methodological issues that would improve syntheses of results across long-term insect datasets and highlight directions for future empirical work.

19 January 2010 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMatthew Forister
Matthew Forister
AMAndrew C. McCall
Andrew C. McCall
NSNate Sanders
Nate Sanders
JFJames A. Fordyce
James A. Fordyce
JTJames Thorne
James Thorne
ASArthur M. Shapiro
Arthur M. Shapiro
Climate change and habitat destruction have been linked to global declines in vertebrate biodiversity, including mammals, amphibians, birds, and fishes. However, invertebrates make up the vast majority of global species richness, and the combined effects of climate change and land use on invertebrates remain poorly understood. Here we present 35 years of data on 159 species of butterflies from 10 sites along an elevational gradient spanning 0–2,775 m in a biodiversity hotspot, the Sierra Nevada Mountains of Northern California. Species richness has declined at half of the sites, with the most severe reductions at the lowest elevations, where habitat destruction is greatest. At higher elevations, we observed clear upward shifts in the elevational ranges of species, consistent with the influence of global warming. Taken together, these long-term data reveal the interacting negative effects of human-induced changes on both the climate and habitat available to butterfly species in California. Furthermore, the decline of ruderal, disturbance-associated species indicates that the traditional focus of conservation efforts on more specialized and less dispersive species should be broadened to include entire faunas when estimating and predicting the effects of pervasive stressors.

22 June 2019 in Conservation Science and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMatthew Forister
Matthew Forister
EPEmma M. Pelton
Emma M. Pelton
SBScott H. Black
Scott H. Black
Recent regional reports and trends in biomonitoring suggest that insects are experiencing a multicontinental crisis that is apparent as reductions in abundance, diversity, and biomass. Given the centrality of insects to terrestrial ecosystems and the food chain that supports humans, the importance of addressing these declines cannot be overstated. The scientific community has understandably been focused on establishing the breadth and depth of the phenomenon and on documenting factors causing insect declines. In parallel with ongoing research, it is now time for the development of a policy consensus that will allow for a swift societal response. We point out that this response need not wait for full resolution of the many physiological, behavioral, and demographic aspects of declining insect populations. To these ends, we suggest primary policy goals summarized at scales from nations to farms to homes.