Fernando Pérez

Dr. Fernando Pérez

Department of Geography and Spatial Management, and Environmental Sciences Institute (IUCA), University of Zaragoza, C/ Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LVLidia Vlassova
Lidia Vlassova
Fernando PérezFernando Pérez
Fernando Pérez
MRMarcos Rodrigues
Marcos Rodrigues
RMRaquel Montorio
Raquel Montorio
Alberto García-MartínAlberto García-Martín
Alberto García-Martín
The paper assesses spatio-temporal patterns of land surface temperature (LST) and fire severity in the Las Hurdes wildfire of Pinus pinaster forest, which occurred in July 2009, in Extremadura (Spain), from a time series of fifteen Landsat 5 TM images corresponding to 27 post-fire months. The differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) was used to evaluate burn severity. The mono-window algorithm was applied to estimate LST from the Landsat thermal band. The burned zones underwent a significant increase in LST after fire. Statistically significant differences have been detected between the LST within regions of burn severity categories. More substantial changes in LST are observed in zones of greater fire severity, which can be explained by the lower emissivity of combustion products found in the burned area and changes in the energy balance related to vegetation removal. As time progresses over the 27 months after fire, LST differences decrease due to vegetation regeneration. The differences in LST and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) values between burn severity categories in each image are highly correlated (r = 0.84). Spatial patterns of severity and post-fire LST obtained from Landsat time series enable an evaluation of the relationship between these variables to predict the natural dynamics of burned areas.

12 May 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LVLidia Vlassova
Lidia Vlassova
Fernando PérezFernando Pérez
Fernando Pérez
HNHéctor Nieto
Héctor Nieto
PMPilar Martín
Pilar Martín
DRDavid Riano
David Riano
Juan de la RivaJuan de la Riva
Juan de la Riva
Land Surface Temperature (LST) is one of the key inputs for Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere transfer modeling in terrestrial ecosystems. In the frame of BIOSPEC (Linking spectral information at different spatial scales with biophysical parameters of Mediterranean vegetation in the context of global change) and FLUXPEC (Monitoring changes in water and carbon fluxes from remote and proximal sensing in Mediterranean “dehesa” ecosystem) projects LST retrieved from Landsat data is required to integrate ground-based observations of energy, water, and carbon fluxes with multi-scale remotely-sensed data and assess water and carbon balance in ecologically fragile heterogeneous ecosystem of Mediterranean wooded grassland (dehesa). Thus, three methods based on the Radiative Transfer Equation were used to extract LST from a series of 2009–2011 Landsat-5 TM images to assess the applicability for temperature input generation to a Landsat-MODIS LST integration. When compared to surface temperatures simulated using MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission 5 (MODTRAN 5) with atmospheric profiles inputs (LSTref), values from Single-Channel (SC) algorithm are the closest (root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) = 0.50 °C); procedure based on the online Radiative Transfer Equation Atmospheric Correction Parameters Calculator (RTE-ACPC) shows RMSD = 0.85 °C; Mono-Window algorithm (MW) presents the highest RMSD (2.34 °C) with systematical LST underestimation (bias = 1.81 °C). Differences between Landsat-retrieved LST and MODIS LST are in the range of 2 to 4 °C and can be explained mainly by differences in observation geometry, emissivity, and time mismatch between Landsat and MODIS overpasses. There is a seasonal bias in Landsat-MODIS LST differences due to greater variations in surface emissivity and thermal contrasts between landcover components.

29 August 2018 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UPUribe Paula
Uribe Paula
Jorge AngasJorge Angas
Jorge Angas
Fernando PérezFernando Pérez
Fernando Pérez
JRJaime Vicente Redón
Jaime Vicente Redón
BLBeatriz Ezquerra Lebrón
Beatriz Ezquerra Lebrón
This paper presents experimentation carried out at the Roman Republican city of La Caridad (Teruel, Spain), where different tools have been applied to obtain multispectral and thermal aerial images to enhance detection of archaeological cropmarks. Two different drone systems were used: a Mikrokopter designed by Tecnitop SA (Zaragoza, Spain) and an eBee produced by SenseFly Company (Cheseaux-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland). Thus, in this study, we have combined in-house manufacturing with commercial products. Six drone sensors were tested and compared in terms of their ability to identify buried remains in archaeological settlements by means of visual recognition. The sensors have different spectral ranges and spatial resolutions. This paper compares the images captured with different spectral range sensors to test the potential of this technology for archaeological benefits. The method used for the comparison of the tools has been based on direct visual inspection, as in traditional aerial archaeology. Through interpretation of the resulting data, our aim has been to determine which drones and sensors obtained the best results in the visualization of archaeological cropmarks. The experiment in La Caridad therefore demonstrates the benefit of using drones with different sensors to monitor archaeological cropmarks for a more cost-effective assessment, best spatial resolution and digital recording of buried archaeological remains.

1 December 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLT. Lasanta
T. Lasanta
MKMakki Khorchani
Makki Khorchani
Fernando PérezFernando Pérez
Fernando Pérez
PEP. Errea
P. Errea
RSR. Sáenz-Blanco
R. Sáenz-Blanco
Estela Nadal RomeroEstela Nadal Romero
Estela Nadal Romero

18 December 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJosé Ramón Melendo de la Vega
José Ramón Melendo de la Vega
PMPilar Martín
Pilar Martín
JPJavier Pacheco-Labrador
Javier Pacheco-Labrador
RGRosario Gonzalez-Cascon
Rosario Gonzalez-Cascon
GMGerardo Moreno
Gerardo Moreno
DRDavid Riano
David Riano
The 3-D Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) FLIGHT can represent scattering in open forest or savannas featuring underlying bare soils. However, FLIGHT might not be suitable for multilayered tree-grass ecosystems (TGE), where a grass understory can dominate the reflectance factor (RF) dynamics due to strong seasonal variability and low tree fractional cover. To address this issue, we coupled FLIGHT with the 1-D RTM PROSAIL. The model is evaluated against spectral observations of proximal and remote sensing sensors: the ASD Fieldspec® 3 spectroradiometer, the Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) and the MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) onboard Sentinel-2. We tested the capability of both PROSAIL and PROSAIL+FLIGHT to reproduce the variability of different phenological stages determined by 16-year time series analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (MODIS-NDVI). Then, we combined concomitant observations of biophysical variables and RF to test the capability of the models to reproduce observed RF. PROSAIL achieved a Relative Root Mean Square Error (RRMSE) between 6% to 32% at proximal sensing scale. PROSAIL+FLIGHT RRMSE ranged between 7% to 31% at remote sensing scales. RRMSE increased in periods when large fractions of standing dead material mixed with emergent green grasses —especially in autumn—; suggesting that the model cannot represent the spectral features of this material. PROSAIL+FLIGHT improves RF simulation especially in summer and at mid-high view angles.

16 June 2009 in Land Degradation & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Fernando PérezFernando Pérez
Fernando Pérez
PIPaloma Ibarra
Paloma Ibarra
MEM. T. Echeverría
M. T. Echeverría
Juan de la RivaJuan de la Riva
Juan de la Riva