Background: Identifying and treating patients with transient ischemic attack is an effective means of preventing stroke. However, making this diagnosis can be challenging, and over a third of patients referred to stroke prevention clinic are ultimately found to have alternate diagnoses. Aims: We performed a systematic review to determine how neurologists diagnose transient ischemic attack. Summary of review: A systematic literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Publications eligible for inclusion were those that included information on the demographic or clinical features neurologists use to diagnose transient ischemic attacks or transient ischemic attack–mimics. Of 1666 citations, 210 abstracts were selected for full-text screening and 80 publications were ultimately deemed eligible for inclusion. Neurologists were more likely to diagnose transient ischemic attack based on clinical features including negative symptoms or speech deficits. Patients with positive symptoms, altered level of consciousness, or the presence of nonfocal symptoms such as confusion or amnesia were more likely to be diagnosed with transient ischemic attack–mimic. Neurologists commonly include mode of onset (i.e. sudden versus gradual), recurrence of attacks, and localizability of symptoms to a distinct vascular territory in the diagnostic decision-making process. Transient ischemic attack diagnosis was more commonly associated with advanced age, preexisting hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and other vascular risk factors. Conclusions: Neurologists rely on certain clinical and demographic features to distinguish transient ischemic attacks from mimics, which are not currently reflected in widely used risk scores. Clarifying how neurologists diagnose transient ischemic attack may help frontline clinicians to better select patients for referral to stroke prevention clinics.

Background and Purpose: Research suggests that women and men may present with different transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke symptoms. We aimed to explore symptoms and features associated with a definite TIA/stroke diagnosis and whether those associations differed by sex. Methods: We completed a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to The Ottawa Hospital Stroke Prevention Clinic in 2015. Exploratory multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate candidate variables associated with diagnosis and patient sex. Backwards elimination of the interaction terms with a significance level for staying in the model of 0.25 was used to arrive at a more parsimonious model. Results: Based on 1770 complete patient records, sex-specific differences were noted in TIA/stroke diagnosis based on features such as duration of event, suddenness of symptom onset, unilateral sensory loss, and pain. Conclusions: This preliminary work identified sex-specific differences in the final diagnosis of TIA/stroke based on common presenting symptoms/features. More research is needed to understand if there are biases or sex-based differences in TIA/stroke manifestations and diagnosis.

Background: Viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) are severe, often high-consequence, life-threatening illnesses characterized by systemic disease, hemorrhage, and high mortality. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH) Annual Meeting functions as a major international forum for the presentation of emerging data on infectious diseases, including novel pharmacologic and biologic interventions for VHF. However, while ASTMH presentations provide timely and high-impact insights, there is no efficient, consolidated synthesis of this rapidly evolving evidence base. Given the acute, outbreak-prone nature of VHF and the need for rapid translation of emerging data into clinical and public health practice, a structured synthesis of these data is warranted. Methods: This systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines and is limited to presentations delivered at the ASTMH Annual Meeting in Toronto (9–13 November 2025) in order to capture evolving evidence as it has emerged. Studies of all designs evaluating vaccines, chemoprophylactic agents, or targeted biological therapies for the prevention or treatment of VHF in adults and children were included. Data were extracted on incidence of VHF among exposed populations, safety, toxicity, and tolerability of preventive and therapeutic interventions, and morbidity and mortality outcomes among treated individuals. Secondary outcomes include hospitalization length-of-stay, economic outcomes, and measures of feasibility, acceptability, accessibility, and health equity. Results: Nine studies (four oral presentations, two poster presentations, and three hand-searched references) were included in the final synthesis. Seven studies evaluated pharmacologic preventive interventions and two evaluated experimental pharmacotherapeutics, with two studies contributing evidence to both categories. One observational study and one narrative review provided contextual evidence on vaccine readiness and outbreak preparedness. Discussion/Conclusions: This systematic review provides a rapid, structured synthesis of targeted medical interventions as emerging evidence at an expert scientific venue, while addressing the current lack of a consolidated, accessible summary of emerging VHF evidence. By rapidly organizing and evaluating these data, this work facilitates timely interpretation and application in clinical and public health settings where rapid decision-making is critical.

Marine envenomations are common non-infectious hazards for travelers. Lionfish, venomous fish native to Indo-Pacific waters, have become an invasive species in the Atlantic Ocean and threat to native marine ecosystems. Various control measures have been implemented in response to rapidly expanding lionfish populations, including licensed culling by recreational divers. We herein review lionfish envenomation through framing with a case that occurred during a diving trip to Curacao for the purpose of lionfish spearfishing. Following initial management in Curacao with hot water immersion, wound care, and antibiotic prophylaxis, the patient continued to have persistent swelling, bruising, and pain to the puncture site and was referred to our outpatient clinic for further evaluation. In addition to reviewing clinical syndromes and approach to management for common marine envenomations that may be encountered in the post-travel setting, we situate this case within the broader ecological context of expanding invasive species ranges with climate change and rising sea temperatures. Pre-travel providers should counsel patients at high risk for marine envenomations on preventative measures, along with how and when to seek care following exposure. Post-travel providers should be familiar with the immediate and long-term sequelae of non-infectious envenomations and intoxications, including marine exposures. Larger national and multinational collaborations are required to mitigate the effects of climate change and international marine movement on invasive species, especially those that incur risk to marine and human health alike.