NUREDDIN YUZKAT

Dr. NUREDDIN YUZKAT

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2019 in Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMehmet Kilic
Mehmet Kilic
NYNUREDDIN YUZKAT
NUREDDIN YUZKAT
CSCelaleddin Soyalp
Celaleddin Soyalp
NGNurcin Gulhas
Nurcin Gulhas
The present study aimed to determine the profit/loss ratio and the service costs in intensive care unit (ICU) based on the length of ICU stay. This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 458 patients who were admitted to ICU between August 2016 and August 2017. Depending on the length of their ICU stay, the patients were divided into six groups: (I) 1 day, (II) 2 days, (III) 3 days, (IV) 4 days, (V) 5 days and (VI) more than 5 days. These charges were evaluated under six categories: surgery, laboratory tests, drugs, tools and equipment, radiographic workup and others. This study reviewed the medical records of patients including 273 (59.6%) men and 185 (40.4%) women. The mean age of the patients was 53.87±22.6 years. The profit/loss ratio was in favour of loss in group I (12,870.82 TL), group II (9,384.61 TL) and group III (371.18 TL). The ration was in favour of profit in group IV (16,505.4 TL). Total service costs comprised 38.51% drug costs, 24.45% tools/equipment, 13.14% laboratory tests, 10% other costs, 4.92% surgical costs and 3.1% radiographic tests. The cost analysis based on the service costs in ICU with regards to the length of ICU stay revealed that due to the greater use of diagnostic, surgical and medical tools and equipment and laboratory and radiographic tests, the profit/loss ratio was in favour of loss within the first three days in ICU. This ratio turned to profit beginning from day 4 in ICU due to the decrease in the use of these equipment and tests. Moreover, total ICU costs comprised 38.51% drug costs and 24.45% medical tools and equipment.

2 February 2020 in Clinical and Experimental Hypertension
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NYNUREDDIN YUZKAT
NUREDDIN YUZKAT
CSCelaleddin Soyalp
Celaleddin Soyalp
OTOmer Turk
Omer Turk
SKSıddık Keskin
Sıddık Keskin
NGNurcin Gulhas
Nurcin Gulhas
Purpose: Anxiety is one of the most important causes of hypertension, increasing direct blood pressure and affecting postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of showing the operating room on preoperative anxiety and hemodynamics among patients with hypertension. Methods: We enrolled 90 patients with hypertension undergoing cholecystectomy in this trial. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using a sealed-envelope system. Group STOR was shown the operating room the day before surgery, while Group No STOR was not shown the operating room. Results: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores measured on the day of surgery were lower for Group STOR (43.2 ± 6.0) than Group No STOR (49.8 ± 7.9) (p = .001). Systolic (p = .001, p = .006, respectively), diastolic (p = .001, p = .004, respectively), and heart rate (p = .018, p = .031, respectively) values in the operation room and preoperative unit were lower in Group STOR than in Group No STOR. The number of postponed operations in Group STOR was lower than in Group No STOR (p = .043), and the patient satisfaction score in Group STOR was higher than in Group No STOR (p = .031). Conclusion: In patients with hypertension, preoperative anxiety, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate all increase in the preoperative unit and operation room. Our findings indicate that showing the operating room to patients with hypertension decreases preoperative anxiety, as well as blood pressure and heart rate inside the operating room and preoperative unit. It also reduces the number of postponed operations and increases patient satisfaction.

29 May 2018 in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSCelaleddin Soyalp
Celaleddin Soyalp
NYNUREDDIN YUZKAT
NUREDDIN YUZKAT
MKMehmet Kilic
Mehmet Kilic
MAMehmet Edip Akyol
Mehmet Edip Akyol
CDCanser Yilmaz Demir
Canser Yilmaz Demir
NGNurcin Gulhas
Nurcin Gulhas

29 January 2025 in BMC Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AOAli Kendal Oğuz
Ali Kendal Oğuz
CSCelaleddin Soyalp
Celaleddin Soyalp
YTYunus Emre Tunçdemir
Yunus Emre Tunçdemir
ATArzu Esen Tekeli
Arzu Esen Tekeli
NYNUREDDIN YUZKAT
NUREDDIN YUZKAT
Patient safety is important in daily anesthesia practices, and providing deep anesthesia is difficult. Current debates on the optimal anesthetic agents highlight the need for safer alternatives. This study was justified by the need for safer and more effective anesthetic protocols for outpatient hysteroscopic procedures, particularly those conducted outside the operating room. Propofol, while widely used, has significant limitations, including respiratory depression, hemodynamic instability, and delayed recovery when higher doses are required for adequate sedation. The addition of opioids to propofol, though beneficial for analgesia, introduces risks such as hypoxemia and hypotension. These challenges necessitate exploring alternative combinations that balance sedation depth with fewer side effects. To assess the efficacy and safety of deep sedoanalgesia achieved with dexmedetomidine-propofol versus remifentanil-propofol combinations in daily anesthesia practices. Prospective randomized clinical study. This study was carried out at Dursun Odabaş Medical Center. Eighty ASA I–II patients, aged 18–65, scheduled for elective hysteroscopic interventions under sedoanalgesia were included in the study. The primary aim of our study was to identify an anesthetic agent combination capable of delivering effective and safe deep sedation, with sedation depth assessed via the Ramsey Sedation Score (RSS) and respiratory safety evaluated through desaturation rates. Secondary endpoints included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, oxygen saturation (SpO2), patient, surgeon, and anesthesiologist satisfaction scores, hemodynamic parameters, the time to achieve an RSS > 4, the time to reach a Modified Aldrete Score (MAS) > 9, and the requirement for mask ventilation and jaw thrust maneuvers. Patients were randomized into two groups (n = 40 each): Patients in the DP group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores and desaturation rates (p = 0.003) compared to the RP group. Satisfaction scores (patient, surgeon, anesthesiologist) and integrated pulmonary index (IPI) values were significantly higher in the DP group (p < 0.05). The dexmedetomidine-propofol combination is an effective and safe anesthetic regimen for deep sedation in outpatient hysteroscopic procedures, offering adequate sedation and superior preservation of respiratory function. Additionally, the dexmedetomidine-propofol combination ensures more stable hemodynamics, with a lower incidence of hypoxia, and results in higher satisfaction rates among patients, surgeons, and anesthesiologists. Clinical Trials ID is NCT05674201 Date 2022.12.07. Dexmedetomidine combined with propofol provides adequate depth of anesthesia and analgesia for hysteroscopic procedures. The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol affects respiratory function less, and hypoxemia is less common in patients. When nonoperating rooms administer dexmedetomidine, one should be prepared for cardiovascular complications, especially bradycardia.

1 January 2016
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCM B Cegin
M B Cegin
LSL Soyoral
L Soyoral
NYNUREDDIN YUZKAT
NUREDDIN YUZKAT
VBV Baydi
V Baydi
UGU Goktas
U Goktas

1 February 2011 in European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YIYasemin Isk
Yasemin Isk
UGUgur Goktas
Ugur Goktas
NYNUREDDIN YUZKAT
NUREDDIN YUZKAT
IKIsmail Kati
Ismail Kati