Zepbound (tirzepatide) is among the most effective obesity medicines for weight reduction, in both clinical trial and real-world settings. Product marketing largely centers on weight-loss magnitude, which may reinforce the expectation that larger reductions are always better. Using de-identified EHRs, we compared 1,039 Zepbound initiators (1.7%) whose first-year weight loss reached ≥30% (“excessive weight loss”) with 20,668 Zepbound initiators (34.7%) who lost 5%-15% (“moderate weight loss”). After 1:4 propensity score matching (837 versus 3,348 patients), large language model (LLM)-curation extracted 24 adverse events that physician notes explicitly attributed to weight loss. The rate of any weight loss-attributable adverse event was significantly higher with excessive weight loss, at 39.4 versus 14.4 per 100 patient-years, representing 294 (35.1%) versus 479 (14.3%) patients (rate ratio [RR]: 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.40-3.21; P<0.001). Falls, weakness, syncope, alopecia, low blood pressure, gastro-intestinal symptoms, and muscle loss were significantly enriched in the excessive weight loss cohort after false-discovery-rate correction (all q<0.001). Hospitalization was documented in 215 patients (25.7%) with excessive weight loss versus 527 patients (15.7%) with moderate weight loss (RR: 1.63, 1.42-1.87), Intensive care admission in 44 patients (5.3%) versus 77 patients (2.3%) (RR: 2.29, 1.59-3.28) (both q<0.001), and newly recorded heart-failure diagnosis in 11 patients (1.3%) versus 16 patients (0.5%) (RR: 2.75, 1.28-5.91; q=0.028). Laboratory tests and vital measurements recorded within 30 days of the lowest achieved body weight corroborated these findings, including significant enrichments in systolic (<90 mmHg) or diastolic (<60 mmHg) hypotension (RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.51-4.05), anemia (RR: 1.86, 1.45-2.40), hyponatremia (RR: 2.74, 1.63-4.60), hypokalemia (RR: 2.34, 1.58-3.46), hypocalcemia (RR: 3.25, 1.87-5.68), hypoalbuminemia (RR: 2.93, 1.83-4.70), and hypoproteinemia (RR: 3.89, 2.32-6.52) in excessive weight loss patients (all q<0.001). While residual confounding and documentation differences may contribute to some real-world associations, the significantly greater burden of adverse events, hospitalization rates, laboratory test anomalies, and vital-sign abnormalities among Zepbound patients with excessive weight loss warrants further investigation. These findings support moving towards individualized weight-loss goals, motivate the need for prospective studies into the risk-benefit profile of Zepbound, and call for closer scrutiny of pharmaceutical marketing to clarify that the greatest weight reduction may not translate into better health outcomes.