Fabrizio Lo Presti

Dr. Fabrizio Lo Presti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 November 2021
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Mario AllegraMario Allegra
Mario Allegra
ABAntonella Bongiovanni
Antonella Bongiovanni
GCGiuseppe Città
Giuseppe Città
ACAntonella Cusimano
Antonella Cusimano
VGValentina Dal Grande
Valentina Dal Grande
ASAlessandro Signa
Alessandro Signa

18 December 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ARAnna Re
Anna Re
GCGiuseppe Città
Giuseppe Città
MGManuel Gentile
Manuel Gentile
FPFabrizio Lo Presti
Fabrizio Lo Presti
VPVanessa Pitrella
Vanessa Pitrella
SPSalvatore Perna
Salvatore Perna

11 September 2026 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFabrizio Lo Presti
Fabrizio Lo Presti
CTCrispino Tosto
Crispino Tosto
PRPier Cesare Rivoltella
Pier Cesare Rivoltella
Mario AllegraMario Allegra
Mario Allegra
MGManuel Gentile
Manuel Gentile
Creativity is recognized as a multifaceted competence that can be nurtured within educational contexts, yet traditional pedagogies often fail to foster its potential. Concurrently, the rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is reshaping conceptions of creative agency, positioning AI as a collaborative partner rather than a mere tool. This systematic review examines 27 empirical and theoretical studies on generative AI tools and closely related AI-mediated creative-support systems in their early adoption phase (January 2022–March 2024) aimed at enhancing creativity in educational and professional settings, with a focus on art and design educational contexts. Findings indicate that while AI tools show promise in boosting short-term creativity dimensions like fluency and originality, the field remains methodologically fragmented. The empirical studies mostly rely on short-term interventions, small samples, and individual-centric measures, missing the dialogic complexity of human–AI collaboration. Based on these gaps, this study proposes a theoretically grounded research agenda. The agenda consists of three theoretically informed propositions for future investigation: Interaction as a transversal unit of analysis across the 4P framework; creative agency as a dynamic continuum regulating initiative, control, and responsibility; and process-oriented assessment capable of supporting metacognitive reflection during human–AI co-creation. Finally, this work presents a reflection on post-2024 AI developments, underlining how such developments increase the relevance of the proposed research agenda.