Laura Carotti

Dr. Laura Carotti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 May 2023 in Agricultural Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LCLaura Carotti
Laura Carotti
APAlessandro Pistillo
Alessandro Pistillo
IZIlaria Zauli
Ilaria Zauli
DMDavide Meneghello
Davide Meneghello
Michael MartinMichael Martin
Michael Martin
Francesco OrsiniFrancesco Orsini
Francesco Orsini

9 March 2023 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Michael MartinMichael Martin
Michael Martin
EBElin Bengtsson
Elin Bengtsson
LCLaura Carotti
Laura Carotti
KOKristin Orrestig
Kristin Orrestig
Francesco OrsiniFrancesco Orsini
Francesco Orsini

17 July 2026 in European Journal of Horticultural Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPR. Prandi
R. Prandi
LCLaura Carotti
Laura Carotti
GPGiuseppina Pennisi
Giuseppina Pennisi
Michael MartinMichael Martin
Michael Martin
GGGIORGIO PROSDOCIMI GIANQUINTO
GIORGIO PROSDOCIMI GIANQUINTO
Francesco OrsiniFrancesco Orsini
Francesco Orsini
In plant factories with artificial lighting (PFAL), light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are the sole light source, essential for photosynthesis. Changing light features (e.g. spectrum, photoperiod and intensity) can optimize crop quality and yield, reduce energy consumption and production costs and increase energy use efficiency (EUE). Individually inspecting light features has been extensively explored, whereas comprehensive analyses of varying light features while maintaining a similar daily light integral (DLI, the total daily amount of mol received by plants) have been limited. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different combinations of photoperiod and light intensity on the yield, growth and lighting-energy use efficiency (L-EUE) while maintaining a constant DLI on four leafy vegetable crops, namely crispy lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.), green kale ( Brassica oleracea L.), pak choi ( Brassica rapa L.) and lettuce var. canasta ( L. sativa L.). The experiment took place in a commercial vertical farm equipped with full white spectrum LED light fixtures. Three different light regimes with a DLI (9.75 ± 0.15 mol m −2 day −1 ) were used for the experiment, obtained by simultaneously varying photoperiod and light intensity, as follows: 14 h day −1 and 190 μmol m −2 s −1 (14/190), 18 h day −1 and 150 μmol m −2 s −1 (18/150), and 24 h day −1 and 115 μmol m −2 s −1 (24/115). Continuous light exposure (24/115) yielded the best morphological results for both lettuce cultivars, whereas pak choi showed higher leaf width at higher light intensity and a shorter photoperiod. L-EUE was not affected by light treatments in crispy lettuce, whereas differences were evident in the other three crops in which the shortest photoperiod with the highest intensity was associated with the lowest L-EUE values. Conversely, differences in light use efficiency (LUE) were observed only in pak choi with the shorter photoperiod (14/190), resulting in higher LUE values than in the continuous day (24/115) treatment. The use of 24/115 and 18/150 is a valid strategy to increase L-EUE for the crops used in this study, but additional research with higher DLI is needed to further investigate the effects of different combinations of light intensity and photoperiod in commercial settings. Significance of the study: What is already known on this subject? Light intensity and photoperiod independently affect crop growth and energy-use efficiency in vertical farms. However, their combined effects at constant daily light integral (DLI) need to be deeply investigated, especially in commercial settings. What are the new findings? Reducing light intensity while extending the photoperiod at constant DLI improved lighting-energy use efficiency (L-EUE) by approximately two-fold in canasta lettuce, pak choi and green kale, without compromising yield. Species-specific morphological responses were observed, with lettuce showing increased plant height under continuous light. Additionally, pak choi exhibited higher light use efficiency (LUE) under shorter, more intense exposure. What are the expected impacts on horticulture? These results demonstrate that extending photoperiods at lower light intensities can reduce energy consumption in vertical farms without affecting productivity. The species-specific responses highlight the importance of developing crop-specific light recipes to optimize both yield and energy efficiency in indoor commercial production systems.

3 September 2026 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vivek JadhavVivek Jadhav
Vivek Jadhav
Afsaneh NematpourAfsaneh Nematpour
Afsaneh Nematpour
GPGiuseppina Pennisi
Giuseppina Pennisi
APAlessandro Pistillo
Alessandro Pistillo
LCLaura Carotti
Laura Carotti
Francesco OrsiniFrancesco Orsini
Francesco Orsini
While vertical farming may offer high productivity per unit land area and has received increasing attention for urban food production, research has primarily focused on leafy greens and herbs. Although recent studies have also introduced fruiting vegetables and cereal crops, comparative evaluations under standardized environmental conditions remain limited because crop morphology, duration, harvestable organs, and biomass allocation differ substantially among crop types. This study, conducted in AlmaVFarm, the experimental vertical farm of the University of Bologna, evaluated the productivity and resource use efficiency of five representative crops grown under identical environmental conditions. Crops included dwarf corn as a staple crop, dwarf tomato as a fruit crop, basil as an herb, and lettuce and arugula as leafy greens. To enable meaningful cross-crop evaluations, performance was assessed using normalized indicators of land-surface, cultivation volume, light, energy, and cost use efficiencies. Lettuce achieved the highest annual marketable yield (73.2 kg FW m−2 y−1), producing 46% more than arugula and 35% more than basil. It also exhibited the greatest land-surface use efficiency (65 kg m−2 y−1), volume use efficiency (24.5 kg m−3 y−1), and energy use efficiency (46.7 g FW kWh−1), corresponding to 3.5-fold and 58-fold higher energy efficiency than tomato and corn, respectively, and up to 1.8-fold higher than arugula and basil. The normalized resource use efficiency framework enabled robust comparisons among contrasting crop categories despite their distinct biological characteristics, revealing substantial differences in adaptation to indoor cultivation. These findings provide a quantitative basis for crop selection and diversification strategies in vertical farming while highlighting the need for crop-specific optimization to improve the resource use efficiency and commercial viability of fruit and staple crops in CEA.