Jesper Christiansen

Dr. Jesper Christiansen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2013 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMari K. Pihlatie
Mari K. Pihlatie
JCJesper Christiansen
Jesper Christiansen
HAHermanni Aaltonen
Hermanni Aaltonen
JKJanne F.J. Korhonen
Janne F.J. Korhonen
ANAnnika Nordbo
Annika Nordbo
JPJukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen

1 January 2012 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LVLars Vesterdal
Lars Vesterdal
BEBo Elberling
Bo Elberling
JCJesper Christiansen
Jesper Christiansen
ICIngeborg Callesen
Ingeborg Callesen
ISInger Kappel Schmidt
Inger Kappel Schmidt

23 August 2018 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJuergen Kreyling
Juergen Kreyling
ASAndreas H Schweiger
Andreas H Schweiger
MBMichael Bahn
Michael Bahn
PIPhil Ineson
Phil Ineson
MMMirco Migliavacca
Mirco Migliavacca
KLKlaus Steenberg Larsen
Klaus Steenberg Larsen

1 October 2015 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJesper Christiansen
Jesper Christiansen
JOJosh Outhwaite
Josh Outhwaite
SSSean M. Smukler
Sean M. Smukler

6 January 2011 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJesper Christiansen
Jesper Christiansen
JKJanne F. J. Korhonen
Janne F. J. Korhonen
RJRadoslaw Juszczak
Radoslaw Juszczak
MGMichael Giebels
Michael Giebels
MPMari Pihlatie
Mari Pihlatie

30 June 2020 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTim Clough
Tim Clough
PRPhilippe Rochette
Philippe Rochette
STSteve M. Thomas
Steve M. Thomas
MPMari Pihlatie
Mari Pihlatie
JCJesper Christiansen
Jesper Christiansen
RTRachel E. Thorman
Rachel E. Thorman
Terrestrial ecosystems, both natural ecosystems and agroecosystems, generate greenhouse gases (GHGs). The chamber method is the most common method to quantify GHG fluxes from soil–plant systems and to better understand factors affecting their generation and mitigation. The objective of this study was to review and synthesize literature on chamber designs (non‐flow‐through, non‐steady‐state chamber) and associated factors that affect GHG nitrous oxide (N2O) flux measurement when using chamber methods. Chamber design requires consideration of many facets that include materials, insulation, sealing, venting, depth of placement, and the need to maintain plant growth and activity. Final designs should be tailored, and bench tested, in order to meet the nuances of the experimental objectives and the ecosystem under study while reducing potential artifacts. Good insulation, to prevent temperature fluctuations and pressure changes, and a high‐quality seal between base and chamber are essential. Elimination of pressure differentials between headspace and atmosphere through venting should be performed, and designs now exist to eliminate Venturi effects of earlier tube‐type vent designs. The use of fans within the chamber headspace increases measurement precision but may alter the flux. To establish best practice recommendations when using fans, further data are required, particularly in systems containing tall plants, to systematically evaluate the effects that fan speed, position, and mixing rate have on soil gas flux.