Hermanni Aaltonen

Hermanni Aaltonen

Auto-generated profile, based on publicly available information

Hermanni Aaltonen

Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00101 Helsinki, Finland

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2013 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMari K. Pihlatie
Mari K. Pihlatie
JCJesper Christiansen
Jesper Christiansen
HAHermanni Aaltonen
Hermanni Aaltonen
JKJanne F.J. Korhonen
Janne F.J. Korhonen
ANAnnika Nordbo
Annika Nordbo
JPJukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen

1 June 2011 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAH. Aaltonen
H. Aaltonen
JPJ. Pumpanen
J. Pumpanen
MPM. Pihlatie
M. Pihlatie
HHH. Hakola
H. Hakola
HHH. Hellén
H. Hellén
JBJaana Bäck
Jaana Bäck

27 October 2011 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJ. Williams
J. Williams
JCJ. Crowley
J. Crowley
HFH. Fischer
H. Fischer
HHH. Harder
H. Harder
MMM. Martinez
M. Martinez
JLJos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld
This paper describes the background, instrumentation, goals, and the regional influences on the HUMPPA-COPEC intensive field measurement campaign, conducted at the Boreal forest research station SMEAR II (Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relation) in Hyytiälä, Finland from 12 July–12 August 2010. The prevailing meteorological conditions during the campaign are examined and contrasted with those of the past six years. Back trajectory analyses show that meteorological conditions at the site in 2010 were characterized by a higher proportion of southerly flow than in the other years studied. As a result the summer of 2010 was anomalously warm and high in ozone making the campaign relevant for the analysis of possible future climates. A comprehensive land use analysis, provided on both 5 and 50 km scales, shows that the main vegetation types surrounding the site on both the regional and local scales are: coniferous forest (Scots pine and/or Norway spruce); mixed forest (Birch and conifers); and woodland scrub (e.g. Willows, Aspen); indicating that the campaign results can be taken as representative of the Boreal forest ecosystem. In addition to the influence of biogenic emissions, the measurement site was occasionally impacted by sources other than vegetation. Specific tracers have been used here to identify the time periods when such sources have impacted the site namely: biomass burning (acetonitrile and CO), urban anthropogenic pollution (pentane and SO2) and the nearby Korkeakoski sawmill (enantiomeric ratio of chiral monoterpenes). None of these sources dominated the study period, allowing the Boreal forest summertime emissions to be assessed and contrasted with various other source signatures.

1 September 2010 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJaana Bäck
Jaana Bäck
HAHermanni Aaltonen
Hermanni Aaltonen
HHHeidi Hellén
Heidi Hellén
MKMaija K. Kajos
Maija K. Kajos
JPJohanna Patokoski
Johanna Patokoski
JHJussi Heinonsalo
Jussi Heinonsalo

1 May 2014 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LKLiisa Kulmala
Liisa Kulmala
HAHermanni Aaltonen
Hermanni Aaltonen
FBFrank Berninger
Frank Berninger
AKAntti-Jussi Kieloaho
Antti-Jussi Kieloaho
JLJanne Levula
Janne Levula
JPJukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen

6 March 2014 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJ. Aalto
J. Aalto
PKP. Kolari
P. Kolari
PHP. Hari
P. Hari
VKV.-M. Kerminen
V.-M. Kerminen
PSP. Schiestl-Aalto
P. Schiestl-Aalto
JBJaana Bäck
Jaana Bäck
Estimates of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from forests are based on the assumption that foliage has a steady emission potential over its lifetime, and that emissions are mainly modified by short-term variations in light and temperature. However, in many field studies this has been challenged, and high emissions and atmospheric concentrations have been measured during periods of low biological activity, such as in springtime. We conducted measurements during three years, using an online gas-exchange monitoring system to observe volatile organic emissions from a mature (1 year-old) and a growing Scots pine shoot. The emission rates of organic vapors from vegetative buds of Scots pine during the dehardening and rapid shoot growth stages were one to two orders of magnitude higher than those from mature foliage; this difference decreased and finally disappeared when the new shoot was maturing in late summer. On average, the springtime monoterpene emission rate of the bud was about 500 times higher than that of the mature needles; during the most intensive needle elongation period, the monoterpene emission rate of the growing needles was 3.5 higher than that of the mature needles, and in September the monoterpene emission rate of the same years' needles was even lower (50%) than that of the previous years' needles. For other measured compounds (methanol, acetone and methylbutenol) the values were of the same order of magnitude, except before bud break in spring, when the emission rates of buds for those compounds were on average about 20–30 times higher than that of mature needles. During spring and early summer the buds and growing shoots are a strong source of several VOCs, and if they are not accounted for in emission modeling a significant proportion of the emissions – from a few percent to even half of the annual cumulative emissions – will remain concealed. The diurnal emission pattern of growing shoots differed from the diurnal cycle in temperature as well as from the diurnal emission pattern of mature shoots, which may be related to processes involved in shoot or needle elongation. Our findings imply that global estimations of monoterpene emission rates from forests are in need of revision, and that the physiological state of the plants should be taken into account when emissions of the reactive gases such as monoterpenes are estimated.