Vaccination against the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV) is widely practiced in both sows and piglets. However, it has been shown that multivaccinated sows sometimes lack a detectable antibody response, testing seronegative in ELISA (non-responders). Moreover, PRRSV-vaccinated piglets can remain seronegative as well, which is mainly attributed to the interference of maternally derived antibodies (MDAs). The current study investigated the impact of the sow’s immune status on the PRRSV vaccine effectiveness in the progeny. The experimental trial included forty-eight piglets (n = 48) originating from a commercial Belgian breeding herd, with twenty-four piglets born from PRRSV vaccinated responder sows (E+ piglets) and twenty-four piglets born from PRRSV vaccinated non-responder sows (E− piglets). Eight piglets in each group were either non-vaccinated (NoVac piglets; n = 8), intramuscularly vaccinated (IM piglets; n = 8), or intradermally vaccinated (ID piglets; n = 8), with the same PRRSV-1 vaccine as used in the sow population. Vaccination was performed at weaning at three weeks of age, and all study piglets were challenged with a high dose of the PRRSV-1 07V063 strain at 6 weeks of age. A clear interference of MDAs was observed in the E+ piglets: 66.7% of the vaccinated E+ piglets lacked an antibody response at 3 weeks post-vaccination (non-responders). Consequently, post-challenge, only the responding E+ piglets had a significantly reduced serum viremia compared to the E+ NoVac piglets. The observed viremia in the non-responding E+ piglets was similar to the viremia of the E+ NoVac piglets. In the vaccinated E− piglets, a lack of antibody response at 3 weeks post-vaccination was observed in 18.8% of the piglets. Interestingly, despite the lack of a vaccine antibody response, the non-responding E− piglets had a significantly reduced serum viremia compared to the NoVac E− piglets. In contrast, the viremia of the responding E− piglets was only numerically reduced compared to the NoVac E− piglets. Finally, some clear differences were observed in both the kinetics of infection and the immune responses post-challenge between the E+ and E− piglets. The results of this study confirm the consequences of the MDA interference on the induced partial protection of PRRSV vaccination in experimentally challenged piglets. More research is warranted to understand the immunological mechanisms behind MDA interference in PRRSV vaccination and to explain the observed differences between E+ and E− piglets.

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) remains an infectious agent with high importance in the swine industry. In this study, the influence of maternally derived antibodies (MDAs) on an experimental PRRSV-1 challenge is investigated. Piglets included in the study (n = 36) originated from a Belgian farrow-to-finish herd in which the sow population was routinely vaccinated with a modified live vaccine against PRRSV. Eighteen piglets were born from three PRRSV-seropositive sows (responders to vaccination) and had a clear presence of PRRSV-specific MDAs (E+ piglets). The other eighteen piglets were born from three PRRSV-seronegative sows (non-responders to vaccination) and did not have PRRSV-specific MDAs (E− piglets). In each group, twelve piglets were intranasally challenged with a high dose of the heterologous PRRSV-1 07V063 strain, the remaining piglets were mock-challenged (PBS) and served as controls. During the first days after infection, higher serum viremia and nasal shedding were observed in the challenged E− piglets compared to the challenged E+ piglets. However, at 10 days post-infection, the peak serum viremia was significantly higher in the E+ piglets in comparison to the E− piglets and serum viremia remained slightly higher in this group until the end of the study. Additionally, the two challenged groups had a different immune response to the PRRSV infection. The E− challenged piglets showed an earlier and more intense seroconversion, leading to significantly higher antibody titers at 10 dpi compared to the E+ challenged piglets. Furthermore, a trend towards both higher induction of serum IFN-γ and higher induction of IFN-γ secreting cells was observed in the E− challenged piglets. In contrast, a significantly higher induction of serum TNF-α at 7 dpi was seen in the E+ challenged piglets compared to the E− challenged piglets. The results gathered in this study suggest that PRRSV-specific MDAs induce partial protection during the early stages of infection but are not sufficient to protect against a high challenge dose. The presence of piglets lacking PRRSV-specific MDAs might pose a risk for PRRSV infection and enhanced transmission in pig farms in young piglets.

The 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19) showed how genetic mutations can alter coronavirus characteristics. However, the evolution of livestock coronaviruses remains understudied. We analyzed 15 bovine coronavirus (BCoV), three porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV) and 18 porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV) isolates, mainly from Belgian livestock collected between 2020 and 2023. Spike gene phylogenetic analysis showed nucleotide substitution rates comparable between BCoV and PRCV, while PHEV appeared slower. Unlike severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), synonymous substitutions were preferred, limiting amino acid variation across decades in the animal coronaviruses. Virus neutralization assays with swine antisera indicated minimal antigenic change in PHEV and PRCV. Recent BCoV isolates showed antigenic divergence from the classical Mebus vaccine strain. The impact of this divergence on vaccine efficacy may warrant further research. Our findings underscore the need for periodic surveillance, as changes in surface proteins may affect pathogenicity, tissue tropism, host range and vaccine efficacy.

Reliable large-scale testing for respiratory viruses, including influenza viruses, coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV-2, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is essential for both endemic surveillance and pandemic response. While RT-qPCR remains the current gold standard, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for alternative, scalable detection platforms. Although alternative approaches like liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) are well-suited for viral multiplexing, they have yet to undergo clinical validation. Here, we present a quantitative immuno-multiple reaction monitoring (iMRM) assay, called Winterplex, for the simultaneous detection of influenza A, influenza B, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2, each targeted via two proteotypic peptides per virus. The method was validated according to ISO standards for in vitro diagnostics and benchmarked against RT-qPCR. To enhance future pandemic preparedness, urgent investment is needed to translate and expand multiplexed MS-based diagnostic methodologies, which offer the flexibility to incorporate a wide range of targets, making them ideally suited for rapid and adaptable responses to emerging viral threats.