Andrea Peruzzi

Prof. Dr. Andrea Peruzzi

Department of Agronomy and Agroecosystem Management, University of Pisa, Via S. Michele degli Scalzi 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 October 2016 in Precision Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPablo Gonzalez-De-Santos
Pablo Gonzalez-De-Santos
ARAngela Ribeiro
Angela Ribeiro
CFCesar Fernández-Quintanilla
Cesar Fernández-Quintanilla
FLFrancisca Lopez-Granados
Francisca Lopez-Granados
MBMichael Brandstoetter
Michael Brandstoetter
BDBenoit Debilde
Benoit Debilde
Feeding the growing global population requires an annual increase in food production. This requirement suggests an increase in the use of pesticides, which represents an unsustainable chemical load for the environment. To reduce pesticide input and preserve the environment while maintaining the necessary level of food production, the efficiency of relevant processes must be drastically improved. Within this context, this research strived to design, develop, test and assess a new generation of automatic and robotic systems for effective weed and pest control aimed at diminishing the use of agricultural chemical inputs, increasing crop quality and improving the health and safety of production operators. To achieve this overall objective, a fleet of heterogeneous ground and aerial robots was developed and equipped with innovative sensors, enhanced end-effectors and improved decision control algorithms to cover a large variety of agricultural situations. This article describes the scientific and technical objectives, challenges and outcomes achieved in three common crops.

1 June 2017 in Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea PeruzziAndrea Peruzzi
Andrea Peruzzi
LMLuisa Martelloni
Luisa Martelloni
Christian FrasconiChristian Frasconi
Christian Frasconi
MFMarco Fontanelli
Marco Fontanelli
MPMichel Pirchio
Michel Pirchio
MRMichele Raffaelli
Michele Raffaelli
Intra-row weed control in organic or low-input cropping systems is more difficult than in conventional agriculture. The various mechanical and thermal devices available for intra-row weed control are reported in this review. Low-tech mechanical devices such as cultivators, finger-weeders, brush weeders, and torsionweeders tend to be used in low density crops, while spring-tine harrows are mainly applied in narrow-row high-density crops. Flame weeding can be used for both narrow and wide-row sown crops, provided that the crop is heat-tolerant. Robotic weeders are the most recent addition to agricultural engineering, and only a few are available on the market. Nowadays, robotic weeders are not yet used in small and medium sized farms. In Europe, highincome niche crops are often cultivated in small farms and farmers cannot invest in high-tech solutions. Irrespectively of the choice of low- or high-tech machines, there are several weeders that can be used to reduce the use of herbicides, making of them a judicious use, or decide to avoid them.

23 July 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mino SportelliMino Sportelli
Mino Sportelli
Orly Enrique Apolo-ApoloOrly Enrique Apolo-Apolo
Orly Enrique Apolo-Apolo
Marco FontanelliMarco Fontanelli
Marco Fontanelli
Christian FrasconiChristian Frasconi
Christian Frasconi
Michele RaffaelliMichele Raffaelli
Michele Raffaelli
Manuel Perez-RuizManuel Perez-Ruiz
Manuel Perez-Ruiz
The advancement of computer vision technology has allowed for the easy detection of weeds and other stressors in turfgrasses and agriculture. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single shot object detectors for weed detection in lawns, which represents a difficult task. In this study, four different YOLO (You Only Look Once) object detectors version, along with all their various scales, were trained on a public ‘Weeds’ dataset with 4203 digital images of weeds growing in lawns with a total of 11,385 annotations and tested for weed detection in turfgrasses. Different weed species were considered as one class (‘Weeds’). Trained models were tested on the test subset of the ‘Weeds’ dataset and three additional test datasets. Precision (P), recall (R), and mean average precision (mAP_0.5 and mAP_0.5:0.95) were used to evaluate the different model scales. YOLOv8l obtained the overall highest performance in the ‘Weeds’ test subset resulting in a P (0.9476), mAP_0.5 (0.9795), and mAP_0.5:0.95 (0.8123), while best R was obtained from YOLOv5m (0.9663). Despite YOLOv8l high performances, the outcomes obtained on the additional test datasets have underscored the necessity for further enhancements to address the challenges impeding accurate weed detection.

31 January 2012 in Weed Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrea PeruzziAndrea Peruzzi
Andrea Peruzzi
MRM Raffaelli
M Raffaelli
CFC Frasconi
C Frasconi
MFM Fontanelli
M Fontanelli
PBP Bàrberi
P Bàrberi

13 September 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMattia Fontani
Mattia Fontani
Sofia Matilde LuglioSofia Matilde Luglio
Sofia Matilde Luglio
Lorenzo GagliardiLorenzo Gagliardi
Lorenzo Gagliardi
Andrea PeruzziAndrea Peruzzi
Andrea Peruzzi
Christian FrasconiChristian Frasconi
Christian Frasconi
Marco FontanelliMarco Fontanelli
Marco Fontanelli
Climate change and labour shortage are re-shaping farming methods. Agricultural tasks are often hard, tedious and repetitive for operators, and farms struggle to find specialized operators for such works. For this and other reasons (i.e., the increasing costs of agricultural labour) more and more farmers have decided to switch to autonomous (or semi-autonomous) field robots. In the past decade, an increasing number of robots has filled the market of agricultural machines all over the world. These machines can easily cover long and repetitive tasks, while operators can be employed in other jobs inside the farms. This paper reviews the current state-of-the-art of autonomous robots for agricultural operations, dividing them into categories based on main tasks, to analyze their main characteristics and their fields of applications. Seven main tasks were identified: multi-purpose, harvesting, mechanical weeding, pest control and chemical weeding, scouting and monitoring, transplanting and tilling-sowing. Field robots were divided into these categories, and different characteristics were analyzed, such as engine type, traction system, application field, safety sensors, navigation system, country of provenience and presence on the market. The aim of this review is to provide a global view on agricultural platforms developed in the past decade, analyzing their characteristics and providing future perspectives for next robotic platforms. The analysis conducted on 59 field robots, those already available on the market and not, revealed that one fifth of the platforms comes from Asia, and 63% of all of them are powered by electricity (rechargeable batteries, not solar powered) and that numerous platforms base their navigation system on RTK-GPS signal, 28 out of 59, and safety on LiDAR sensor (12 out of 59). This review considered machines of different size, highlighting different possible choices for field operations and tasks. It is difficult to predict market trends as several possibilities exist, like fleets of small robots or bigger size platforms. Future research and policies should focus on improving navigation and safety systems, reducing emissions and improving level of autonomy of robotic platforms.

10 September 2013 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gonzalo Pajares MartinsanzGonzalo Pajares Martinsanz
Gonzalo Pajares Martinsanz
Andrea PeruzziAndrea Peruzzi
Andrea Peruzzi
PGPablo Gonzalez-De-Santos
Pablo Gonzalez-De-Santos
Agriculture and Forestry are two broad and promising areas demanding technological solutions with the aim of increasing production or accurate inventories for sustainability while the environmental impact is minimized by reducing the application of agro-chemicals and increasing the use of environmental friendly agronomical practices. In addition, the immediate consequence of this “trend” is the reduction of production costs.