Suture anchors (SAs) are medical devices used to connect soft tissue to bone. Traditionally these were made of metal; however, in the past few decades, bio-absorbable suture anchors have been created to overcome revision surgeries and other complications caused by metallic SAs. This systematic review aims to analyze the biomechanical properties of these SAs to gain a better understanding of their safety and utilization. A comprehensive systematic review that adhered to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Primary outcomes were that the pull-out strength of SAs, the rate of degradation secondarily, and the biocompatibility of all SAs were analyzed. After screening 347 articles, 16 were included in this review. These studies revealed that the pull-out strength of bio-absorbable SAs was not inferior to that of their non-absorbable comparatives. The studies also revealed that the rate of degradation varies widely from 7 to 90 months. It also showed that not all absorbable SAs were fully absorbed within the expected timeframe. This systematic review demonstrates that existing suture anchor materials exhibit comparable pull-out strengths, material-specific degradation rates, and variable biocompatibility. All-suture anchors had promising results in biocompatibility, but evidence fails to identify a single most favorable material. Higher-powered studies that incorporate tissue-specific characteristics, such as rotator cuff tear size, are warranted. To meet demonstrated shortcomings in strength and biocompatibility, we propose silk fibroin as a novel material for suture anchor design for its customizable properties and superior strength.

Background: Despite cocoon silk’s well-known strength, biocompatibility, and hypoallergenic properties, its potential medical applications remain largely unexplored. This review, therefore, is of significance as it evaluates the mechanical properties and clinical potential of cocoon silk, a material with promising applications in biomaterials and tissue engineering. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Our focus was on the primary outcomes of tensile strength and elongation at break, and the secondary outcomes included other mechanical properties, applications, and complications. Results: Out of the 192 silk-related studies, 9 met the criteria. These studies revealed that cocoon silk derivatives exhibit a wide range of tensile strength, from 0.464 to 483.9 MPa (with a median of 4.27 MPa), and elongation at break, from 2.56% to 946.5% (with a median of 60.0%). Biomedical applications of cocoon silk derivatives span from tissue regeneration (n = 6) to energy harvesting (n = 4). Complications often arose from material fragility in non-optimized derivative components. Conclusions: While cocoon silk shows expansive promise due to its suitable mechanical properties and low complication risk, plenty remains to be discovered. Future research is crucial to fully realizing its vast surgical and biomedical potential.

Cartilage regeneration remains a major clinical challenge because cartilage has limited healing capacity and must withstand substantial mechanical loading. Silk fibroin, a cocoon-derived biomaterial with tunable mechanical properties, has emerged as a promising scaffold material for cartilage tissue engineering. This systematic review evaluates the biomechanical performance, fabrication approaches, and regenerative potential of silk fibroin bioprinted scaffolds for cartilage repair. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcomes included scaffold mechanical properties relevant to cartilage function. Secondary outcomes included scaffold composition, fabrication methods, biological performance, clinical applications, and reported limitations. Of 918 identified records, 24 studies published between 2014 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. Most were preclinical studies using silk fibroin-based hydrogels, often combined with hyaluronic acid, gelatin, collagen, or synthetic polymers. Mechanical properties varied according to scaffold composition and crosslinking methods. Reinforced scaffolds generally demonstrated improved stiffness, structural support, and load distribution. Silk fibroin scaffolds consistently supported chondrogenesis and cartilage-like tissue formation. However, challenges remain, including mechanical mismatch with native cartilage, construct instability, cell loss, and suboptimal degradation profiles. Overall, silk fibroin bioprinted scaffolds demonstrated support for chondrogenesis and cartilage-like tissue formation in preclinical studies for cartilage regeneration. Future research should focus on standardized biomechanical testing, long-term in vivo evaluation, and clinically relevant scaffold designs to facilitate translation toward functional cartilage repair.