Following a conversation in a crowded restaurant or at a lively party poses immense perceptual challenges for some individuals with normal hearing thresholds. A number of studies have investigated whether noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (CS; damage to the synapses between cochlear hair cells and the auditory nerve following noise exposure that does not permanently elevate hearing thresholds) contributes to this difficulty. A few studies have observed correlations between proxies of noise-induced CS and speech perception in difficult listening conditions, but many have found no evidence of a relationship. To understand these mixed results, we reviewed previous studies that have examined noise-induced CS and performance on speech perception tasks in adverse listening conditions in adults with normal or near-normal hearing thresholds. Our review suggests that superficially similar speech perception paradigms used in previous investigations actually placed very different demands on sensory, perceptual, and cognitive processing. Speech perception tests that use low signal-to-noise ratios and maximize the importance of fine sensory details— specifically by using test stimuli for which lexical, syntactic, and semantic cues do not contribute to performance—are more likely to show a relationship to estimated CS levels. Thus, the current controversy as to whether or not noise-induced CS contributes to individual differences in speech perception under challenging listening conditions may be due in part to the fact that many of the speech perception tasks used in past studies are relatively insensitive to CS-induced deficits.
25 March 2019 in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
Cochlear implant (CI) programming is similar for all CI users despite limited understanding of the electrode-neuron interface (ENI). The ENI refers to the ability of each CI electrode to effectively stimulate target auditory neurons and is influenced by electrode position, neural health, cochlear geometry, and bone and tissue growth in the cochlea. Hearing history likely affects these variables, suggesting that the efficacy of each channel of stimulation differs between children who were implanted at young ages and adults who lost hearing and received a CI later in life. This study examined whether ENI quality differed between early-implanted children and late-implanted adults. Auditory detection thresholds and most comfortable levels (MCLs) were obtained with monopolar and focused electrode configurations. Channel-to-channel variability and dynamic range were calculated for both types of stimulation. Electrical field imaging data were also acquired to estimate levels of intracochlear resistance. Children exhibited lower average auditory perception thresholds and MCLs compared with adults, particularly with focused stimulation. However, neither dynamic range nor channel-to-channel threshold variability differed between groups, suggesting that children’s range of perceptible current was shifted downward. Children also demonstrated increased intracochlear resistance levels relative to the adult group, possibly reflecting greater ossification or tissue growth after CI surgery. These results illustrate physical and perceptual differences related to the ENI of early-implanted children compared with late-implanted adults. Evidence from this study demonstrates a need for further investigation of the ENI in CI users with varying hearing histories.
17 July 2020 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Purpose: Weighting of acoustic cues for perceiving place-of-articulation speech contrasts was measured to determine the separate and interactive effects of age and use of cochlear implants (CIs). It has been found that adults with normal hearing (NH) show reliance on fine-grained spectral information (e.g., formants), whereas adults with CIs show reliance on broad spectral shape (e.g., spectral tilt). In question was whether children with NH and CIs would demonstrate the same patterns as adults, or show differences based on ongoing maturation of hearing and phonetic skills. Method: Children and adults with NH and with CIs categorized a /b/–/d/ speech contrast based on two orthogonal spectral cues. Among CI users, phonetic cue weights were compared to vowel identification scores and Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test thresholds. Results: NH children and adults both relied relatively more on the fine-grained formant cue and less on the broad spectral tilt cue compared to participants with CIs. However, early-implanted children with CIs better utilized the formant cue compared to adult CI users. Formant cue weights correlated with CI participants' vowel recognition and in children, also related to Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test thresholds. Adults and child CI users with very poor phonetic perception showed additive use of the two cues, whereas those with better and/or more mature cue usage showed a prioritized trading relationship, akin to NH listeners. Conclusions: Age group and hearing modality can influence phonetic cue-weighting patterns. Results suggest that simple nonlexical categorization tests correlate with more general speech recognition skills of children and adults with CIs.
Age-related changes in auditory processing may reduce physiological coding of acoustic cues, contributing to older adults' difficulty perceiving speech in background noise. This study investigated whether older adults differed from young adults in patterns of acoustic cue weighting for categorizing vowels in quiet and in noise. All participants relied primarily on spectral quality to categorize /ɛ/ and /æ/ sounds under both listening conditions. However, relative to young adults, older adults exhibited greater reliance on duration and less reliance on spectral quality. These results suggest that aging alters patterns of perceptual cue weights that may influence speech recognition abilities.
Purpose: Sensory difficulties are increasingly recognized as part of the pathology of Parkinson's disease (PD). The present study examined hearing in people with PD to further advance understanding of audition in the disease process. A PD group was compared to an age-matched control group to build a nuanced understanding of hearing in PD at standard and extended high frequencies and the relationship of intensity to perceived loudness. Method: Two participant groups (with 30 paired members) were recruited: a PD group and an age-matched control group. At the between-groups level, pure-tone audiometric hearing thresholds across standard and extended high frequencies were measured. Categorical loudness scaling (CLS) also was assessed. At the within-group level, relationships of auditory measures to PD motor symptom severity were tested. Results: Pure-tone audiometric metrics did not differ for the PD and control groups. One CLS parameter differed between the groups and was correlated with symptom severity. Linear modeling indicated that PD motor symptom severity in the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale was predicted from average hearing thresholds at frequencies most important for speech perception (500, 1000, and 2000 Hz). Conclusions: The relative lack of differences between the PD and control groups in their hearing abilities may reflect the relatively mild severity of the disease in this sample. However, the observed relationship between motor symptom severity and hearing thresholds suggests that PD severity may be associated with a decline in hearing ability that warrants further investigation and clinical monitoring in conjunction with other PD symptoms.