Aims: Ganz’s studies made it possible to address joint deformities on both the femoral and acetabular side brought about by Perthes’ disease. Femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) was developed to improve joint congruency, along with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), which may enhance coverage and containment. The purpose of this study is to show the clinical and morphological outcomes of the technique and the use of an implemented planning approach.Methods: From September 2015 to December 2021, 13 FHROs were performed on 11 patients for Perthes’ disease in two centres. Of these, 11 hips had an associated PAO. A specific CT- and MRI-based protocol for virtual simulation of the corrections was developed. Outcomes were assessed with radiological parameters (sphericity index, extrusion index, integrity of the Shenton’s line, lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle), and clinical parameters (range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)). Early and late complications were reported.Results: The mean follow-up was 39.7 months (standard deviation (SD) 26.4). The mean age at surgery was 11.4 years (SD 1.6). No major complications were recorded. One patient required a total hip arthroplasty. Mean femoral head sphericity increased from 46.8% (SD 9.34%) to 70.2% (SD 15.44; p < 0.001); mean LCEA from 19.2° (SD 9.03°) to 44° (SD 10.27°; p < 0.001); mean extrusion index from 37.8 (SD 8.70) to 7.5 (SD 9.28; p < 0.001); and mean Tönnis angle from 16.5° (SD 12.35°) to 4.8° (SD 4.05°; p = 0.100). The mean VAS improved from 3.55 (SD 3.05) to 1.22 (1.72; p = 0.06); mean Merle d’Aubigné-Postel score from 14.55 (SD 1.74) to 16 (SD 1.6; p = 0.01); and mean mHHS from 60.6 (SD 18.06) to 81 (SD 6.63; p = 0.021). The EQ-5D-5L also showed significant improvements.Conclusion: FHRO associated with periacetabular procedures is a safe technique that showed improved functional, clinical, and morphological outcomes in Perthes’ disease. The newly introduced simulation and planning algorithm may help to further refine the technique.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):40–46.

Background: Hip replacement surgery is highly effective in relieving pain and improving mobility in patients with various hip conditions. However, some patients develop groin pain after surgery, often due to iliopsoas impingement (IPI), which can be challenging to diagnose. Conservative treatments are initially recommended, but when these are not effective, surgical options may be considered. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes, success and failure rates, revision rates, and complications associated with arthroscopic and endoscopic surgery for IPI, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and risks of these surgical interventions. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including a thorough search of five main databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane. Eligible articles were meticulously evaluated according to predefined criteria for levels of evidence (LoE), with retrospective studies assessed using the Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Results: Among the 16 included studies, 431 patients with 434 hips underwent either endoscopic or arthroscopic tenotomy. Both techniques showed favorable outcomes, with arthroscopic tenotomy demonstrating slightly higher success rates than endoscopic tenotomy. Common complications included mild pain and occasional infections, with recurrence observed in some cases. Both techniques offer direct visualization of prosthetic components and potential preservation of psoas function. Conclusions: Arthroscopic and endoscopic iliopsoas tenotomy are effective treatments for alleviating symptoms and improving hip function in patients with IPI post-total hip arthroplasty (THA). Level of evidence: IV.

Background: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) presents challenges in clinical management due to its chronic nature and uncertain etiology. Historically attributed to greater trochanteric bursitis, current understanding implicates abductor tendinopathy as the primary cause. Diagnosis usually involves a clinical examination and additional tests such as imaging and provocative testing. Surgical intervention may be considered for cases refractory to conservative therapy, with endoscopic techniques gaining ground over open procedures. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were searched in four databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. The selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence (LoE). The Coleman methodology score (mCMS) was used to analyze the retrospective studies. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews. Results: Surgical success rates ranged from 70.6–100%, significantly improving pain and function. Complications were generally mild, mainly hematomas and seromas, while recurrence rates were low. However, limitations such as the retrospective design and the absence of control groups warrant cautious interpretation of the results. Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery emerges as a promising option for refractory GTPS, offering effective symptom relief and functional improvement. Despite limitations, these results suggest a favorable risk–benefit profile for endoscopic procedures. Further research is needed, particularly prospective randomized trials, to confirm these findings and optimize surgical techniques to improve patient outcomes.

Posterior wall acetabular fractures, often caused by high-energy trauma, are complex injuries that pose significant surgical challenges, especially when comminuted. Traditional fixation techniques have shown variable outcomes, with severe comminution sometimes rendering fragment fixation impossible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of autologous bone grafting for reconstructing severely comminuted unfixable posterior wall acetabular fractures. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search for clinical studies was carried out across four databases: Embase, PubMed, Medline, and Scopus. The included studies were evaluated using the Coleman Methodology Score. The present study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. The study involved 71 patients, with an average age of 37.12 years. Autologous iliac crest grafts were predominantly used, with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in all cases. Clinical outcomes, assessed by Merle d'Aubigne and Harris Hip Scores, showed 78.9 % of patients reporting excellent to good results. Radiological outcomes indicated 66 % with excellent results per Matta's score. The overall success rate ranged from 57 % to 100 %, with a 5 % conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Complications were reported in 7 % of cases, including nonunion and avascular necrosis. Autologous bone grafts for comminuted, non-fixable posterior wall acetabular fractures may be considered as a potential salvage option in young patients, potentially delaying the need for THA.

Background: This video article describes the technique for arthroscopic reduction and fixation of Pipkin type-I fractures. Description: Surgery is performed with the patient in a supine position, with free lower limbs, on a radiolucent table. Arthroscopic superior and anterolateral portals are made similarly to the portals created to evaluate the peripheral compartment during an outside-in (ballooning) technique. ¹ An additional medial portal is subsequently created in order to aid in reduction and screw placement. The medial portal is created in abduction and external rotation of the hip (i.e., the figure-4 position). The adductor tendon is identified, and the portal is then safely positioned posteriorly to its margin, approximately 4 to 5 cm distal to the inguinal fold, avoiding the saphenous vein (usually identified with an ultrasound scan). The fragment is mobilized, debrided, and then reduced with use of a microfracture awl or a large Kirschner wire (used as a joystick). Following reduction, temporary fixation is performed with use of long Kirschner wires under direct visualization and fluoroscopic guidance. If reduction is satisfactory, definitive fixation can be performed with use of 4.5-mm headless screws through the medial portal. All steps of fragment reduction and fixation are performed through the medial portal, with the patient in the figure-4 position. Once the screws are placed, a final dynamic arthroscopic and fluoroscopic check is performed. Alternatives: In Pipkin type-I fractures, surgery is recommended when the femoral head fragment is large (exceeding 15% to 20% of the femoral head volume) and displaced (by >3 mm). In such cases, if untreated, spontaneous evolution to osteoarthritis may occur. For fragments smaller than 10% to 15% of the femoral head volume, arthroscopic removal is often the best choice ² . Several approaches (e.g., Smith-Petersen, modified Hueter, Kocher-Langenbeck, and surgical safe dislocation) have been proposed for reduction and fixation, with surgical safe dislocation being the most versatile because of the uniquely complete visualization of the femoral head ³ . Rationale: The arthroscopic reduction and fixation technique for a non-comminuted Pipkin type-I fracture holds the intrinsic advantages of being less invasive than open surgery in terms of surgical exposure, and having less blood loss, infection risks, and wound complications. Arthroscopy allows direct visualization of the fragment and its reduction surface, along with removal of articular loose bodies and debridement. The surgical time is influenced by the surgeon’s experience, but often is no longer than with an open procedure. In the few studies assessing the use of this technique, the rates of osteonecrosis and heterotopic ossification are lower than with open techniques. It is worth noting that the studies assessing the use of this procedure are limited both in number and quality; however, the results of these studies have been excellent. It must also be noted that patients undergoing arthroscopic fixation are mostly selected for this treatment because they have less severe injuries ^2–12 . Expected Outcomes: Open reduction and fixation through one of a variety of approaches is the gold standard treatment for Pipkin fractures; however, it is a relatively invasive procedure, prone to increased risks of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and heterotopic ossification (from 4% to 78% of cases). In some cases, arthroscopic reduction and fixation can be as effective as open reduction, and carries with it the intrinsic advantages of a keyhole procedure. The reported 4.6% global complication rate following arthroscopic fixation demonstrates the potential advantages of this technique, with limits due to the low numbers of treated cases ⁴ . Important Tips: The operating room should be carefully set up, especially regarding the positions of the C-arm and the arthroscopy tower, which should be double-checked before starting the procedure. The medial portal should be created after identification of the saphenous vein on an ultrasound scan. The anesthesiologist or a radiologist may mark the vein on the skin preoperatively, or the surgeon may extend the arthroscopic portal and perform a superficial dissection to avoid the vessel. Visualization after creation of the portals is usually suboptimal until the hematoma is completely removed. Patience must be maintained in this phase of the procedure. A microfracture awl or a large Kirschner wire can be utilized as a joystick to aid in reduction of the fragment, from either the usual portals or the medial portal. This aid can facilitate rotation of the fragment, which is a key step in the reduction phase. Definitive fixation can be achieved with use of 4.5-mm cannulated headless screws. Large cannulated headless screws have longer and larger Kirschner wires that can also aid in reduction when used as joysticks, reducing the risk of bending or breaking during screw insertion. Additionally, a 4.5-mm screwdriver is longer, allowing easier insertion, especially in patients with a larger thigh. The large diameter should not be a concern because the head is sunk in a non-weight-bearing area of the head. To avoid the risk of misplacement or loss of the screw during its insertion, make use of a cannulated guide handle for 4.5-mm screws, such as the guide utilized in a Latarjet arthroscopic procedure. To prevent screw loss into the joint, utilize a loop-knotted wire around the proximal part of the screw; this wire is cut at the end of the procedure. Acronyms and Abbreviations: AAFF = arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixation HO = heterotopic ossification US = ultrasound/ultrasonography AP = anteroposterior CT = computed tomography ASIS = anterosuperior iliac spine GT = greater trochanter SP = Smith-Petersen IF = internal fixation K-wire = Kirschner wire

Background: Snapping hip syndrome (SHS) is characterized by snapping sensation and pain and affects up to 10% of the general population. External snapping hip syndrome (ESHS), the most common form, is often due to repetitive movements in sports or anatomical predispositions. Conservative treatment includes physiotherapy and corticosteroid injections, while surgery is considered if conservative measures fail. Open surgical techniques carry several risks, while modern arthroscopic techniques offer less invasive options, such as endoscopic iliotibial band release (ITB) and gluteus maximus tenotomy. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were searched in four databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. The selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to analyze the retrospective studies. This paper was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Results: Out of 9 included studies, 403 patients with 689 hips underwent endoscopic treatment. ITB release and his variations were the main surgical techniques. Gluteus maximus tenotomy was also used in some studies. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols varied. Patients generally experienced significant improvements in symptoms and functional outcomes, with low rates of recurrence (1.02%) and revision (0.15%). Complications were minimal. Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment of ESH shows favorable results, improving functional outcomes and returning patients to pre-injury activity levels. Long-term efficacy and costeffectiveness need to be evaluated, emphasizing the importance of large-scale prospective randomized trials to clarify surgery's benefits in refractory ESH cases.