Jacob William Budtz-Lilly

Dr. Jacob William Budtz-Lilly


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJacob William Budtz-Lilly
Jacob William Budtz-Lilly
MVM. Venermo
M. Venermo
SDS. Debus
S. Debus
Christian Alexander BehrendtChristian Alexander Behrendt
Christian Alexander Behrendt
MAMartin Altreuther
Martin Altreuther
KMK. Mani
K. Mani

1 August 2018 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJacob William Budtz-Lilly
Jacob William Budtz-Lilly
MBMartin Björck
Martin Björck
MVMaarit Venermo
Maarit Venermo
SDSebastian Debus
Sebastian Debus
Christian Alexander BehrendtChristian Alexander Behrendt
Christian Alexander Behrendt
KMKevin Mani
Kevin Mani

1 November 2017 in Journal of Vascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJacob William Budtz-Lilly
Jacob William Budtz-Lilly
AWAnders Wanhainen
Anders Wanhainen
JEJacob Eriksson
Jacob Eriksson
KMKevin Mani
Kevin Mani

19 February 2024 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
APArun D Pherwani
Arun D Pherwani
AJAmundeep S Johal
Amundeep S Johal
DCDavid A Cromwell
David A Cromwell
JBJonathan R Boyle
Jonathan R Boyle
ZSZoltan Szeberin
Zoltan Szeberin
JBJacob William Budtz-Lilly
Jacob William Budtz-Lilly
To determine the peri-operative mortality for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in 10 countries and to compare practice and outcomes over a 6 year period by age, sex, and geographical location. This VASCUNET study used prospectively collected data from vascular registries in 10 countries on primary repair of intact and ruptured AAAs undertaken between January 2014 and December 2019. The primary outcome was peri-operative mortality (30 day or in hospital). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between peri-operative mortality and patient characteristics and type of procedure. Factors associated with the use of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were also evaluated. The analysis included 50 642 intact and 9 453 ruptured AAA repairs. The proportion of EVARs for intact repairs increased from 63.4% in 2014 to 67.3% in 2016 before falling to 62.3% in 2019 (p < .001), but practice varied between countries. EVAR procedures were more common among older patients (p < .001) and men (p < .001). Overall peri-operative mortality after intact AAA repair was 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 - 1.5%) and did not change over time. Mortality rates were stable within countries. Among ruptured AAA repairs, the proportion of EVARs increased from 23.7% in 2014 to 35.2% in 2019 (p < .001). The average aortic diameter was 7.8 cm for men and 7.0 cm for women (p < .001). Overall peri-operative mortality was 31.3% (95% CI 30.4 - 32.2%); the rates were 36.0% (95% CI 34.9 - 37.2%) for open repair and 19.7% (95% CI 18.2 - 21.3%) for EVAR. This difference and shift to EVAR reduced peri-operative mortality from 32.6% (in 2014) to 28.7% (in 2019). The international practice of intact AAA repair was associated with low mortality rates in registry reported data. There remains variation in the use of EVAR for intact AAAs across countries. Overall peri-operative mortality remains high after ruptured AAA, but an increased use of EVAR has reduced rates over time.

11 March 2022 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mario D’OriaMario D’Oria
Mario D’Oria
LBLuca Bertoglio
Luca Bertoglio
ABAngelo Antonio Bignamini
Angelo Antonio Bignamini
KMKevin Mani
Kevin Mani
TKTilo Kölbel
Tilo Kölbel
Alexander ZimmermannAlexander Zimmermann
Alexander Zimmermann

17 August 2022 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HAHelene Arndt
Helene Arndt
JNJoakim Nordanstig
Joakim Nordanstig
DBDaniel J. Bertges
Daniel J. Bertges
JBJacob William Budtz-Lilly
Jacob William Budtz-Lilly
MVMaarit Venermo
Maarit Venermo
Christian Alexander BehrendtChristian Alexander Behrendt
Christian Alexander Behrendt
This study aimed to develop a core set of patient reported outcome quality indicators (QIs) for the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication (IC), that allow a broad international implementation across different vascular registries and within trials. A rigorous modified two stage Delphi technique was used to promote consensus building on patient reported outcome QIs among an expert panel consisting of international vascular specialists, patient representatives, and registry members of the VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries. Potential QIs identified through an extensive literature search or additionally proposed by the panel were validated by the experts in a preliminary survey and included for evaluation. Consensus was reached if ≥ 80% of participants agreed that an item was both clinically relevant and practical. Participation rates in two Delphi rounds were 66% (31 participants of 47 invited) and 90% (54 of 60), respectively. Initially, 145 patient reported outcome QIs were documented. Following the two Delphi rounds, 18 quality indicators remained, all of which reached consensus regarding clinical relevance. The VascuQoL questionnaire (VascuQoL-6), currently the most common patient reported outcome measurement (PROM) used within vascular registries, includes a total of six items. Five of these six items also matched with high rated indicators identified in the Delphi study. Consequently, the panel recommends the use of the VascuQoL-6 survey as a preferred core PROM QI set as well as an optional extension of 12 additional patient reported QIs that were also identified in this study. The current recommendation based on the Delphi consensus building approach, strengthens the international harmonisation of registry data collection in relation to patient reported outcome quality. Continuous and standardised quality assurance will ensure that registry data may be used for future quality benchmarking studies and, ultimately, positively impact the overall quality of care provided to patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.