The standard treatment for breast cancer typically includes surgery, often followed by systemic therapy and individualized treatment regimens. However, there is growing interest in identifying pre-therapeutic biomarkers that can predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study systematically evaluated various analytical parameters, including age, TNM stage, histological type, molecular subtype, and several biomarker ratios, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). We aimed to assess the predictive value of these parameters regarding the tumor’s response rate to NACT. The analysis revealed a statistically significant association between the pathological complete response—pCR (absence of any detectable cancer cells in the tissue following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT))—rate and NLR in the subgroup with values between 1 and 3 (p = 0.001). The optimal cut-off for PLR was determined to be 120.45, with 80.55% of patients achieving pCR showing PLR values below this threshold (p = 0.000). Similarly, the LMR cut-off was found to be 12.34, with 77.77% of patients with pCR having LMR values below this threshold (p = 0.002). Additionally, lower pre-therapeutic values of NLR (p < 0.001), PLR (p = 0.002), SII (p = 0.001), and LMR (p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with pCR compared to the non-pCR subgroup (p < 0.005). These findings highlight the predictive potential of these biomarkers for achieving pCR following NACT. Our study supports the hypothesis that pre-therapeutic values of NLR, PLR, SII, and LMR can serve as predictive biomarkers for pCR in breast cancer patients undergoing NACT. However, the PNI did not demonstrate predictive potential in relation to pCR. These biomarkers may provide valuable insights into patient prognosis and guide personalized treatment strategies.

This systematic review critically evaluates the impact of systemic treatments on outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, with studies published up to December 2023 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. From an initial pool of 1345 articles, 11 relevant studies were selected for inclusion, encompassing a diverse range of systemic treatments, including panitumumab combined with FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRI, irinotecan paired with panitumumab, regorafenib followed by cetuximab ± irinotecan and vice versa, and panitumumab as a maintenance therapy post-induction. Patient demographics predominantly included middle-aged to elderly individuals, with a slight male predominance. Racial composition, where reported, showed a majority of Caucasian participants, highlighting the need for broader demographic inclusivity in future research. Key findings revealed that the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) did not significantly compromise QoL while notably improving disease-free survival, with baseline EQ-5D HSI mean scores ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 and VAS mean scores from 70.1 to 74.1. Improvements in FACT-C scores and EQ-5D Index scores particularly favored panitumumab plus best supportive care in KRAS wild-type mCRC, with early dropout rates of 38–42% for panitumumab + BSC. Notably, cetuximab + FOLFIRI was associated with a median survival of 25.7 months versus 16.4 months for FOLFIRI alone, emphasizing the potential benefits of integrating targeted therapies with chemotherapy. In conclusion, the review underscores the significant impact of systemic treatments, particularly targeted therapies and their combinations with chemotherapy, on survival outcomes and QoL in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, and the need for personalized treatment.

Dyslipidemia is a component of metabolic syndrome, having an important role in the carcinogenesis of different tumor types, such as prostate, ovarian, or renal cancer. The number of studies on the predictive potential of the different components of the lipid profile with a predictive potential in breast cancer is quite low. The evaluation of the lipid profile was carried out for the 142 patients who benefited from neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) in order to identify a potential predictive biomarker. The serological sample collection was performed sequentially according to a standardized protocol, pre-NAC, post-NAC and 6 months post-NAC after a 6-h pre-collection fast. We also investigated in the general group the presence or absence of the p53 mutation (TP53) and of the mitotic index ki-67, respectively, in relation to the molecular subtypes. The menopausal status, tumor size, family history, grading, Ki-67, p53 and LN metastases have a predictive nature regarding overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05), while for disease free survival (DFS), only tumor size, tumor grading, Ki-67 > 14, and p53+ are of predictive nature. The genetic and molecular analysis carried out in our group indicates that 71.67% have a Ki-67 score higher than 14%, and 39% of the patients have the positive P53 mutation. The multivariate analysis in the case of patients included in the TNBC subtype showed that the increased tumor volume (p = 0.002) and increased level of HDL (p = 0.004) represent predictive factors for the tumor response rate to NAC. High HDL-C levels before NAC and increased LDL-C levels after NAC were associated with the better treatment response in ER-positive and HER2+ breast cancer patients. Increased HDL-C values and tumor volume represent predictive factors as to the response rate to NAC in the case of patients included in the TNBC subtype. Regarding the ER+ and HER2+ subtypes, increased levels of HDL-C pre-NAC and increased levels of LDL-C post-NAC were associated with a better therapeutic response rate. Tumor grading, Ki-67, p53, and LN metastases have a predictive nature for OS, while tumor size, tumor grading, and Ki-67 > 14, and p53+ are predictive for DFS.

The predictions on the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on access to medical services in Romania predicted a 35% drop in oncological hospitalizations in 2020 compared to the previous decade, raising the hypothesis that patients with colorectal cancer can become indirect victims of the ongoing pandemic. Therefore, the aim of the current research was to observe how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced colorectal cancer surgery in Romania, to determine the level of addressability towards specialized care, to compare the cancer staging between the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods, and to observe the risk factors for disease progression. This retrospective study was spread over three years, respectively, from March 2019 to March 2022, and included a total of 198 patients with a history of colorectal cancer surgery. It was decided to perform a parallel comparison of 2019, 2020, and 2021 to observe any significant changes during the pandemic. Our clinic encountered a significant decrease in all interventions during the pandemic; although the number of CRC surgeries remained constant, the cases were more difficult, with significantly more patients presenting in emergency situations, from 31.3% in 2019 to 50.0% in 2020 and 57.1% in 2021. Thus, the number of elective surgeries decreased significantly. The proportion of TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging was, however, statistically significant between the pre-pandemic and pandemic period. In 2019, 13.3% of patients had stage IIa, compared with 28.8% in 2020 and 13.1% in 2021. Similarly, the proportion of very advanced colorectal cancer was higher during the pandemic period of 2020 and 2021 (12.0% in 2019 vs. 12.5% in 2020 and 25.0% in 2021), which was represented by a significantly higher proportion of patients with bowel perforation. Patients with an advanced TNM stage had a 6.28-fold increased risk of disease progression, followed by lymphovascular invasion (HR = 5.19). However, the COVID-19 pandemic, represented by admission years 2020 and 2021, did not pose a significant risk for disease progression and mortality. In-hospital mortality during the pandemic also did not change significantly. After the pandemic restrictions have been lifted, it would be advisable to conduct a widespread colorectal cancer screening campaign in order to identify any instances of the disease that went undetected during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Background and Objectives: Nowadays, the development of enabled pharmaceutical nanoparticles of solid lipid type is continuously growing, because they have the potential to be used for targeted drug release leading to an increased effect of chemotherapy, being used in lung cancer nano-diagnosis and nano-therapy. The current study reports the preliminary results obtained regarding the biological effect of a new nano-enabled pharmaceutical formulation in terms of its cytotoxic and biosafety profile. Materials and Methods: The pharmaceutical formulations consist of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) obtained via the emulsification–diffusion method by loading green iron oxide nanoparticles (green-IONPs) with a pentacyclic triterpene (oleanolic acid—OA). Further, a complex biological assessment was performed, employing three-dimensional (3D) bronchial microtissues (EpiAirway^TM) to determine the biosafety profile of the SLN samples. The cytotoxic potential of the samples was evaluated on human lung carcinoma, using an in vitro model (A549 human lung carcinoma monolayer). Results: The data revealed that the A549 cell line was strongly affected after treatment with SLN samples, especially those that contained OA-loaded green-IONPs obtained with Ocimum basilicum extract (under 30% viability rates). The biosafety profile investigation of the 3D normal in vitro bronchial model showed that all the SLN samples negatively affected the viability of the bronchial microtissues (below 50%). As regards the morphological changes, all the samples induce major changes such as loss of the surface epithelium integrity, loss of epithelial junctions, loss of cilia, hyperkeratosis, and cell death caused by apoptosis. Conclusions: In summary, the culprit for the negative impact on viability and morphology of 3D normal bronchial microtissues could be the too-high dose (500 µg/mL) of the SLN sample used. Nevertheless, further adjustments in the SLN synthesis process and another complex in vitro evaluation will be considered for future research.

Background: The aims of our study were to compare serum acylated ghrelin (the active form of ghrelin) concentrations before and after the surgery of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) and to correlate these levels with excess weight loss and hunger sensations on a short-term basis. Methods: The patients included in the study had either (1) a body mass index (BMI) over 35 kg/m(2) and one comorbidity or (2) a BMI over 40 kg/m(2). Ghrelin levels were measured on the day of the surgery, 1 month after the procedure, and 3 months after the procedure. A questionnaire about hunger sensation was administered to the patients, and changes in the patients' weights were evaluated on the same timeline as the measurement of the ghrelin levels. Results: Eighteen obese patients were included in the study, including 10 patients in the LSG group and 8 patients in the LGCP group. All the procedures were performed laparoscopically. The average level of preoperative ghrelin in the LSG group was 212.21 pg/mL +/- 140.57 SD. After 1 month, the average ghrelin level in the LSG group was 74.47 pg/mL +/- 29.55 SD (p = 0.01), and it was 41.47 pg/mL +/- 15.19 SD (p = 0.002) after 3 months. The average level of preoperative ghrelin in the LGCP group was 318.08 pg/mL +/- 161.70 SD. It decreased to 190.58 pg/mL +/- 116.75 SD (p = 0.01) after 1 month and to 91.57 pg/mL +/- 56.70 SD (p = 0.004) after 3 months. Comparing the two groups, hunger sensation had decreased more in the LSG group (p = 0.03) 3 months after the surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) produced the same weight loss and diminished hunger sensation in the short term on the selected patients. LSG had an increased effect on ghrelin levels when compared with LGCP at 1 month after the procedure and 3 months after the procedure.