Background: Strength recovery of injured knee is an important parameter for patients who want to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Comparison of muscle strength between anatomical and non-anatomical ACLR has not been reported. Purpose: To evaluate the difference between anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle ACLR in hamstring and quadriceps strength and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients received unilateral primary single-bundle hamstring ACLR between January 2017 to January 2018 were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into anatomical reconstruction group (AR group) and non-anatomical reconstruction group (NAR group) according to femoral tunnel aperture position. The hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic strength including peak extension torque, peak flexion torque and H/Q ratio were measured at an angular velocity of 180°/s and 60°/s using an isokinetic dynamometer. The isometric extension and flexion torques were also measured. Hamstring and quadriceps strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Knee stability including Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 measurement and subjective knee function including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were evaluated during the follow-up. Results: Seventy-two patients with an average follow-up of 30.4 months (range, 24–35 months) were included in this study. Thirty-three were in AR group and 39 in NAR group. The peak knee flexion torque was significant higher in AR group at 180°/s and 60°/s (P < 0.05 for both velocity) at 6 months postoperatively and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. The isometric knee extension torque was significant higher in AR group at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05) and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. No significant differences between AR group and NAR group were found regarding knee stability and subjective knee function evaluations at follow-up. Conclusions: Compared with non-anatomical ACLR, anatomical ACLR showed a better recovery of hamstring and quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively. However, the discrepancy on hamstring and quadriceps strength between the two groups vanished at 1 year postoperatively.
Aim. To investigate the different effects on osteolysis between commercial pure Ti particles and TiAl6V4 particles obtained from prosthesis of patients with aseptic loosening. Method. Scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive X‐ray spectrometry, and X‐ray diffraction were used for the size test, chemical composition test, and phase analysis of two kinds of Ti particles. Microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT) and 3‐dimensional reconstruction analysis were applied to analyze the bone loss quantitatively and radiologically. Hematoxylin‐eosin (HE) staining and tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining were used to assess the histologic difference. Result. TiAl6V4 particles were constituted by FeO, Al45V7, and Al3Ti while pure Ti particles were constituted by Ti, Ti3O, and C4H7NO3. Similar particle size of nanoscale was detected of two Ti particles. A TiAl6V4 osteolysis model had more severe bone loss when scanned with micro‐CT and assessed by quantitative analysis. TiAl6V4 also presented deeper and wider calvarial bone loss in HE staining and more activated osteoclasts in TRAP staining. Conclusion. A mouse calvarial model is the most effective animal model for the primary in vivo research of aseptic loosening. Compared with commercial Ti particles, TiAl6V4 particles derived from prosthesis of an aseptic loosening patient had more severe bone loss and more activated osteoclast, which was more consistent with pathogenesis of aseptic loosening in vivo, had high success rate of establishment of a model, and was more desired in animal modeling.
3 November 2022 in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD) is often accompanied by concomitant meniscal tears. The study aimed to assess the kinematic alterations of patellofemoral joint (PFJ) in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency knees with or without meniscal tears during a single-leg lunge. Sixty unilateral anterior cruciate ligament deficiency patients were recruited for the study, including 15 isolated anterior cruciate ligament deficiency patients (group 1), 15 anterior cruciate ligament deficiency patients with medial meniscal tears (group 2), 15 patients with lateral meniscal tears (group 3) and 15 patients with combined medial/lateral meniscal tears (group 4). The patellofemoral joint kinematics were determined by a single fluoroscopic image system. Patellofemoral joint kinematics of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament-intact (ACLI) and anterior cruciate ligament deficiency knees were compared. With or without meniscal tears, anterior cruciate ligament deficiency knees had significantly smaller patellar flexion than the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knees (∼5°–10°; p < 0.05). anterior cruciate ligament deficiency knees had more patellar lateral tilting by approximately 1°–2° than the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knees (p < 0.05) in groups 2, 3, and 4. anterior cruciate ligament deficiency groups with medial meniscal deficiencies showed consistent increased lateral patellar translations (2–4 mm) compared to the anterior cruciate ligament-intact group during a single-leg lunge. The results indicate that meniscal tears alter anterior cruciate ligament deficiency patients’ patellofemoral joint kinematics and the types of the meniscal injuries also affect the patellofemoral joint kinematics. Considering the varying effects of meniscal tears on the patellofemoral joint kinematics, specific treatments for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency patients with meniscal tears should be proposed in some closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercise programs, such as single-leg lunge.
Background Strength recovery of injured knee is an important parameter for patients who want to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Comparison of muscle strength between anatomical and non-anatomical ACLR has not been reported. Purpose To evaluate the hamstring and quadriceps strength and clinical outcomes after anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle ACLR. Methods Patients received unilateral primary single-bundle hamstring ACLR between January 2017 to January 2018 were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into anatomical reconstruction group (AR group) and non-anatomical reconstruction group (NAR group) according to femoral tunnel aperture position. The hamstring and quadriceps isokinetic strength including peak extension torque, peak flexion torque and H/Q ratio were measured at an angular velocity of 180°/s and 60°/s using an isokinetic dynamometer. The isometric extension and flexion torques were also measured. Hamstring and quadriceps strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Knee stability including Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 measurement and subjective knee function including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were evaluated during the follow-up. Results Seventy-two patients with an average follow-up of 30.4 months (range, 24–35 months) were included in this study. Thirty-three were in AR group and 39 in NAR group. The peak knee flexion torque was significant higher in AR group at 180°/s and 60°/s (P < 0.05 for both velocity) at 6 months postoperatively and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. The isometric knee extension torque was significant higher in AR group at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05) and showed no difference between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively. No significant differences between AR group and NAR group were found regarding knee stability and subjective knee function evaluations at follow-up. Conclusion Compared with non-anatomical ACLR, anatomical ACLR showed a better recovery of hamstring and quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively. However, the discrepancy on hamstring and quadriceps strength between the two techniques vanished at 1 year postoperatively.