Flora Matheson

Dr. Flora Matheson

Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital 30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2017 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGhazal Fazli
Ghazal Fazli
MCMaria I. Creatore
Maria I. Creatore
FMFlora Matheson
Flora Matheson
SGSara Guilcher
Sara Guilcher
Vered Kaufman-ShriquiVered Kaufman-Shriqui
Vered Kaufman-Shriqui
GBGillian L. Booth
Gillian L. Booth
In recent years, obesity-related diseases have been on the rise globally resulting in major challenges for health systems and society as a whole. Emerging research in population health suggests that interventions targeting the built environment may help reduce the burden of obesity and type 2 diabetes. However, translation of the evidence on the built environment into effective policy and planning changes requires engagement and collaboration between multiple sectors and government agencies for designing neighborhoods that are more conducive to healthy and active living. In this study, we identified knowledge gaps and other barriers to evidence-based decision-making and policy development related to the built environment; as well as the infrastructure, processes, and mechanisms needed to drive policy changes in this area. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of data collected through consultations with a broad group of stakeholders (N = 42) from Southern Ontario, Canada, within various sectors (public health, urban planning, and transportation) and levels of government (federal, provincial, and municipalities). Relevant themes were classified based on the specific phase of the knowledge-to-action cycle (research, translation, and implementation) in which they were most closely aligned. We identified 5 themes including: 1) the need for policy-informed and actionable research (e.g. health economic analyses and policy evaluations); 2) impactful messaging that targets all relevant sectors to create the political will necessary to drive policy change; 3) common measures and tools to increase capacity for monitoring and surveillance of built environment changes; (4) intersectoral collaboration and alignment within and between levels of government to enable collective actions and provide mechanisms for sharing of resources and expertise, (5) aligning public and private sector priorities to generate public demand and support for community action; and, (6) solution-focused implementation of research that will be tailored to meet the needs of policymakers and planners. Additional research priorities and key policy and planning actions were also noted. Our research highlights the necessity of involving stakeholders in identifying inter-sectoral solutions to develop and translate actionable research on the built environment into effective policy and planning initiatives.

1 September 2012 in Canadian Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFlora Matheson
Flora Matheson
JDJames R. Dunn
James R. Dunn
KSKatherine L. W. Smith
Katherine L. W. Smith
RMRahim Moineddin
Rahim Moineddin
RGRichard H. Glazier
Richard H. Glazier

1 September 2015 in Women's Health Issues
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFlora Matheson
Flora Matheson
NDNihaya Daoud
Nihaya Daoud
SHSarah Hamilton-Wright
Sarah Hamilton-Wright
HBHeidi Borenstein
Heidi Borenstein
CPCheryl Pedersen
Cheryl Pedersen
POPatricia O'CAmpo
Patricia O'CAmpo


25 April 2015 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FKFiona G Kouyoumdjian
Fiona G Kouyoumdjian
ASAndrée Schuler
Andrée Schuler
SHStephen Hwang
Stephen Hwang
FMFlora Matheson
Flora Matheson
We conducted a scoping review to define the extent and type of quantitative health status research conducted from 1993 to 2014 with people who have experienced detention or incarceration in correctional facilities in Canada. We searched 15 databases, reviewed reference lists and relevant websites, and consulted with key stakeholders to identify eligible studies. We reviewed records for eligibility and extracted relevant data from eligible articles. We identified 194 studies that were eligible for inclusion. Most studies were conducted with males and with persons in federal facilities, and focused on mental health, substance use, and social determinant of health outcomes. Health status data are limited for several outcomes, such as chronic disease, injury and sexual and reproductive health, and for persons in provincial facilities and post-release. Efforts should be made to improve data collection and knowledge dissemination, so that relevant data can be used more effectively to improve health and health care in this population.

25 June 2014 in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFlora Matheson
Flora Matheson
KSKatherine L W Smith
Katherine L W Smith
GFGhazal S Fazli
Ghazal S Fazli
RMRahim Moineddin
Rahim Moineddin
JDJames R Dunn
James R Dunn
RGRichard H Glazier
Richard H Glazier
Background People with comorbid mental and physical illness (PI) experience worse health, inadequate care and increased mortality relative to those without mental illness (MI). The role of gender in this relationship is not fully understood. This study examined gender differences in onset of mental health service usage among people with physical illness (COPD, asthma, hypertension and type II diabetes) compared with a control cohort. Methods We used a unique linked dataset consisting of the 2000–2001 Canadian Community Health Survey and medical records (n=17 050) to examine risk of onset of MI among those with and without PI among Ontario residents (18–74 years old) over a 10-year period (2002–2011). Adjusted COX proportional survival analysis was conducted. Results Unadjusted use of MI medical services in the PI cohort was 55.6% among women and 44.7% (p=0.0001) among men; among controls 48.1% of the women and 36.7% of the men used MI medical services (p=0.0001). The relative risk of usage among women in the PI group relative to controls was 1.16. Among men, the relative risk was 1.22. Women were 1.45 times more likely to use MI medical services relative to men (HR=1.45, CI 1.35 to 1.55). Respondents in the PI cohort were 1.32 times more likely to use MI medical services (HR=1.32, CI 1.23 to 1.42) relative to controls. Women in the PI cohort used MI medical services 6.4 months earlier than PI males (p=0.0059). In the adjusted model, women with PI were most likely to use MI medical services, followed by women controls, men with PI and men controls. There was no significant interaction between gender and PI cohort. Conclusions Further, gender-based research focusing on onset of usage of MI services among those with and without chronic health problems will enable better understanding of gender-based health disparities to improve healthcare quality, delivery and public health policy.