We evaluated whether Angiotensin receptor/Neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and deaths in cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRTd) non-responders patients at 12 months of follow-up, modulating microRNAs (miRs) implied in adverse cardiac remodeling. adverse cardiac remodeling characterized by left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESv) increase, and the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) reduction are relevant pathological mechanisms in CRTd non-responders and could be linked to changes in miRNAs (miRs), regulating cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and hypertrophy. miRs levels and clinical outcomes (LVEF, cardiac deaths, and 6MWT) were evaluated at baseline and one year of follow-up in CRTd non-responders divided into ARNI-users and Non-ARNI users. At baseline, there were no differences in levels of inflammatory markers, miR-18, miR-145, and miR-181 (p > 0.05) between Non-ARNI users (n 106) and ARNI-users (n 312). At one year of follow-up, ARNI-users vs. Non-ARNI users showed lowest inflammatory markers (p < 0.01) and miR-181 levels (p < 0.01) and higher values of miR-18 (p < 0.01)and miR-145 (p < 0.01). At one year of follow-up, ARNI-users had a higher increase of LVEF (p < 0.01) and 6MWT (p < 0.01) along with a more significant reduction of LVESv (p < 0.01) compared to Non-ARNI users. Cox regression analysis evidenced that ARNI-based therapies increase the probability of anti-remodeling effects of CRTd. Based on symptomatic improvements, echocardiographic and functional classification improvements, 37 (34.9%) patients among ARNI-users became responders, while only twenty (6.4%) patients became responders among Non-ARNi-users. ARNI might influence epigenetic mechanisms modulating miRs implicated in the adverse cardiac remodeling responses to CRTd.

Atherosclerotic plaque instability and rupture in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) is a leading cause of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This could be mainly evidenced in patients with pre-diabetes. Indeed, the altered glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance could cause over-inflammation of atherosclerotic plaque, favoring its conversion to unstable phenotype with rupture and MACE. Notably, metformin therapy reducing the metabolic distress and the inflammatory burden could reduce MACE in ACAS patients with pre-diabetes. In this setting, the microRNAs (miRs) could be used as molecular biomarkers of atherosclerosis progression, plaque rupture, and worse prognosis in normoglycemics (NG) versus pre-diabetics metformin users (PDMU) versus pre-diabetics non-metformin users (PDNMU). However, our study aimed to investigate a wide miRNA panel in peripheral blood exosomes from patients with ACAS divided in NG versus PDMU versus PDNMU, and to associate the circulating miRNA expression profiles with MACE at 2 years of follow-up after endarterectomy. The study included 234 patients with ACAS divided into NG (n = 125), PDNMU (n = 73), and PDMU (n = 36). The miRs’ expression profiles of circulating exosomes were determined at baseline and at 2 years of follow-up by Affymetrix microarrays from the patients’ plasma samples from any study cohort. Then we collected and analyzed MACE at 2 years of follow-up in NG versus PDMU versus PDNMU. Prediabetics versus NG had over-inflammation (p < 0.05) and over expressed miR-24 and miR-27 at baseline. At 2 years of follow-up, PDNMU versus NG, PDMU versus NG, and PDNMU versus PDMU over-expressed inflammatory markers and miR-24, miR-27, miR-100, miR-126, and miR-133 (p < 0.05). Finally, at the end of follow-up, we observed a significant difference about MACE comparing PDNMU versus NG (n = 27 (36.9%) versus n = 8 (6.4%); p < 0.05), PDNMU versus PDMU (n = 27 (36.9%) versus n = 6 (16.6%); p < 0.05); and PDMU versus NG (n = 6 (16.6%) versus n = 8 (6.4%); p < 0.05). Admission glucose values (HR (hazard ratio) 1.020, CI (confidence of interval) 95% (1.001–1.038), p = 0.029), atheromatous carotid plaque (HR 5.373, CI 95% (1.251–11.079), p = 0.024), and miR-24 (HR 3.842, CI 95% (1.768–19.222), p = 0.011) predicted MACE at 2 years of follow-up. Specific circulating miRs could be over-expressed in pre-diabetics and specifically in PDNMU versus PDMU after endarterectomy. MiR24, hyperglycemia, and atheromatous plaque could predict MACE at 2 years of follow-up.

Background: In recent years, in case of aortic valve replacement (AVR), a significant increase in the use of bioprostheses has been observed. The Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis has proven to be safe and reliable in the short and mid-term, with limited but promising long-term results. An updated systematic review with the long-term results of patients who underwent a sutureless bioprosthesis implantation with a Perceval biological valve is herewith presented. Methods: Studies published between 2015 and 2024, including the long-term outcomes—with clinical as well as echocardiographic information for up to five years—of patients who underwent a Perceval implantation for AVR were selected from the published literature. The Cochrane GRADE system was used to assess the study quality, and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) tool was used to evaluate studies. Results: Ten studies were selected with an overall number of 5221 patients. The long-term survival ranged from 64.8 to 87.9%, freedom from structural valve degeneration (SVD) from 96.1 to 100%, freedom from significant paravalvular leak from 98.5 to 100%, freedom from prosthetic endocarditis from 90.7 to 99%, and freedom from reintervention from 94 to 100%. The long-term mortality ranged from 6.5 to 27.4%. SVD was observed in 0–4.8% patients. Significant paravalvular leak was observed in 0–3.4% patients, and infective endocarditis was observed in 0–3.4%. A bioprosthesis-related reintervention at long-term follow-up was required for 0–4.3% of patients, and 1.7–7.1% of patients required a late new pacemaker implantation. The transprosthetic mean pressure gradient ranged from 9 to 14.7 mmHg, peak pressure gradient ranged from 17.8 to 26.5 mmHg, and EOA ranged from 1.5 to 1.7 cm². Conclusions: This systematic review shows that there is still a paucity of data about sutureless bioprostheses. Nevertheless, the clinical results from prospective studies or retrospective series are encouraging. Medium- and long-term results seem to support the increasing use of this type of prosthesis.

Background: According to current guidelines, patients with heart valve disease should be followed by Heart Valve Clinics (HVCs). Regular quality analysis is a major prerequisite of an HVC’s program, but few data have been reported so far. Methods: We retrospectively collected patients with isolated, native aortic valve stenosis who had been visited in our HVC at least once between 2021 and 2024. For each outpatient visit, symptoms, physical examination, echocardiographic data, complementary tests, and indications were acquired. Also, adverse events (hospitalization, unplanned procedures, and death) were retrieved. Results: A total of 320 patients were included. Mean visits/patient ratio was 1.2. At the first visit, 69.7% already had severe aortic stenosis, and severe symptoms (NYHA ≥ III) were evident in 24.4%. In addition, 26.5%, 59.1%, 12.8%, and 1.6% were in Généreux stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Overall, 197 (78.5%) and 54 (21.5%) patients received an indication for transcatheter AVR and surgical AVR, respectively. AVR-free survival was 46%, 23%, and 6% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (mean 8.8 months CI95% 7.7–9.9). Adverse event-free survival was 97.2%, 95.5%, and 85% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: Patients referred to our HVC already had an advanced disease with cardiac damage. Transcatheter AVR was mostly indicated, and it showed excellent short-term results. A low rate of adverse events was seen among patients in follow-up, but the odds of receiving AVR were high and driven by Généreux’s stage. Despite these favorable results, further efforts to sensitize earlier patient referral should be made.