Purpose: – The need for more efficient and effective public-private partnership (PPP) projects makes performance management of increasing importance, especially with respect to stakeholder expectations. This paper seeks to examine the use of key performances indicators (KPI) based on the analysis of critical success factors (CSF) for monitoring of PPP transport projects from the perspective of different stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach: – The list of stakeholders’ performance objectives including CSF was defined using the brainstorming technique applied to group of experts in PPP transport sectors and refined through literature review. Input of the expert group was validated against a feedback from a respective survey. Three main groups of stakeholders were identified: public sector, private sector, and users. Finally, the review and comparative analysis of existing KPIs in PPP transport projects was performed based on stakeholders’ objectives and project attributes using the “frequency of mention” approach. Findings: – The paper introduced a two layers approach for the assessment of PPP projects. The first stage was based on evaluation of project ultimate objectives from the standpoint of each stakeholder, i.e. profitability for private sector, effectiveness and value for money for public sector, and level of service for users. An adjusted and weighted combination of fulfillment of the specific stakeholder objectives leads to an overall approach (second layer) of describing a PPPs success or failure. Originality/value: – The paper presents the comprehensive review of literature on transport PPP projects and evaluation of available CSFs and KPIs.

In order to preserve natural resources, the use of waste and alternative materials in the construction and maintenance of roads is increasingly investigated. This paper presents the results of testing wearing course asphalt mixtures (AC 11s SURF 50/70) made with various percentages of fly ash, used as a partial or complete substitute for mineral filler. The properties of fly ash were determined to assess their suitability for use in asphalt mixtures. The experimental research was performed on asphalt samples containing fly ash from three different sources, with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of mineral filler substitution. The control mixture was prepared with 100% of mineral filler. The paper presents the volumetric composition, stability, and flow of asphalt mixtures tested on standard Marshall’s samples, water sensitivity, and resistance to permanent deformation. The results of this study indicate that a satisfactory volumetric composition can be achieved by adding fly ash, while the bulk density and voids of the mineral and asphalt mixture generally depend on the type of fly ash and its content. The stability and flow of mixtures with fly ash are favourable compared with the control mixture. The water sensitivity of mixtures with fly ash is generally lower compared with the control mixture and depends on the type and percentage of fly ash. The resistance to permanent deformation of the asphalt mixtures depends on the fly ash type and percentage. The results obtained in this study are an important step towards broader implementation of fly ash in asphalt mixtures.

The need for road (re)construction materials is constantly growing. At the same time, there is a limited quantity of new, high-quality materials available and a buildup of secondary/recycled construction materials. One possible solution may be the use of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) in asphalt mixtures instead of natural aggregate (NA), which also promotes economic and environmental sustainability. The potential use of fine and coarse RCA in road asphalt mixtures is analyzed in this work. Nine asphalt mixtures were tested for base course layers, where RCA was used as a NA substitute. The impact of the quantity of RCA (up to 45% by mass) on the resulting physical and mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures was investigated, and consequently compared with the properties of a reference control mixture produced with NA only. Results reveal that the addition of RCA requires higher bitumen in comparison to the control mixture (up to 1%). Consequently, mixtures with RCA had 15−20% lower stiffness and up to 26% higher critical fatigue strain value (ε₆). Although RCA mixtures contained more bitumen, their low-temperature resistance was slightly inferior compared with the control mixture (failure temperatures were up to 4.3 °C higher). In conclusion, asphalt mixtures with up to 45% RCA can be used without substantially reducing performance.

Estimating the variability of key pavement design inputs is essential to reliability-based pavement design. The thickness of most pavement layers has a great impact on the outcome of practically all analyses of pavement performance. The within-section layer thickness variability is investigated here, as is the extent of the mean layer thickness deviation from its design thickness. Pavement layer thickness data (elevation and core measurements) from a large number of newly constructed flexible and rigid pavement sections in the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program were examined. To determine the distribution type of the thickness data, a combined statistical test for skewness and kurtosis showed that ( a) thickness variations within a layer indicate a normal distribution for 86% of 1,034 layers and ( b) the mean thickness deviations from the design values may be assumed to be normally distributed for a layer having a given type and design thickness. The estimated thickness-within-layer variability values and the estimated typical thickness deviations derived from LTPP data may serve as benchmarks for use in pavement design reliability, construction quality assurance specifications, and other research studies. In addition, statistical comparisons of layer thickness variability indicators were made between the elevation and core layer thickness data to determine whether there are systematic differences between these two measuring methods. These results will be very useful to both researchers and practitioners who develop or use reliability-based pavement design procedures.