Florence Vigouroux guillet

Dr. Florence Vigouroux guillet

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGFlorence Vigouroux guillet
Florence Vigouroux guillet
GMG. Mezzadri
G. Mezzadri
RPR. Parot
R. Parot
AGA. Gazarian
A. Gazarian
SPStéphanie Pannier
Stéphanie Pannier
FCF. Chotel
F. Chotel

1 October 2017 in Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGFlorence Vigouroux guillet
Florence Vigouroux guillet
FRF. Rabarin
F. Rabarin
JJJ. Jeudy
J. Jeudy
NBN. Bigorre
N. Bigorre
YCY. Saint Cast
Y. Saint Cast
GRG. Raimbeau
G. Raimbeau

17 February 2021 in Techniques in Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGFlorence Vigouroux guillet
Florence Vigouroux guillet
ETEloïse MdD Tebaa
Eloïse MdD Tebaa
LELionel MdD Erhard
Lionel MdD Erhard
DGDiego MdD Gomez
Diego MdD Gomez
JVJerôme MdD Vogels
Jerôme MdD Vogels
PBPascal Boileau
Pascal Boileau
The use of cerclage alone or as a supplement to other forms of internal fixation is common in orthopedic practice. The Nice knot is a doubled stranded knot described by Boileau and colleagues. Its original application was proposed for tuberosity osteosynthesis in proximal humerus fractures. The Nice knot has been used vastly in shoulder surgery and is now widely use in others surgeries. This article aims to describe the utilization of the Nice knot in wrist arthroscopy to repair the triangular fibrocartilage complex or the scapholunate ligament. We modified the techniques described by Mathoulin for these repairs. The Nice knot is a simple knot, easy to use under arthroscopy to repare the scapholunate ligament and the triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.

1 October 2026 in Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAna-Maria Ciobanu
Ana-Maria Ciobanu
FGFlorence Vigouroux guillet
Florence Vigouroux guillet
LZLarisa-Marina Zahan
Larisa-Marina Zahan
BDBianca Ana Dmour
Bianca Ana Dmour
BPBogdan Puha
Bogdan Puha
ADAwad Dmour
Awad Dmour
Background: Management of surgically treated hand trauma varies according to injury characteristics, referral pathways, and institutional practice, particularly regarding postoperative antibiotic therapy and wound cleansing. This study compared injury patterns, management strategies, and early postoperative outcomes between two European referral centers and evaluated reported practice through a parallel surgeon survey. Methods: We conducted a retrospective two-center cohort study including 360 adults undergoing surgical treatment for hand trauma between April 2024 and March 2025 in Le Mans, France (n = 270), and Iași, Romania (n = 90). Injury mechanisms, anatomical involvement, postoperative antibiotic use and duration, wound irrigation and cleansing practices, follow-up, and postoperative infection were compared. Because the cohorts differed substantially in case mix, a secondary sensitivity analysis was performed using the Romanian acute-injury subgroup (n = 63). A parallel anonymous survey included 70 French and 40 Romanian surgeons involved in hand trauma care. Results: Injury mechanisms differed between centers (p < 0.001), with powered-tool or machinery injuries occurring in 34.4% of Romanian and 15.6% of French patients. The Romanian cohort also had higher frequencies of tendon injury (90.0% vs. 30.7%), neurovascular involvement (57.8% vs. 14.1%), joint involvement (23.3% vs. 12.2%), and associated fracture (27.8% vs. 5.2%; all p ≤ 0.016). Continued postoperative antibiotics were administered to 97.8% of Romanian and 55.2% of French patients (p < 0.001). Among treated patients, 1- to 3-day courses predominated in Romania (85.2% vs. 16.2%; p < 0.001). Wound-cleansing practices also differed substantially. Among patients with documented follow-up, postoperative infection was identified in 3/90 Romanian patients (3.3%) and 3/171 French patients (1.8%; p = 0.418). In the Romanian acute-injury subgroup, infection occurred in 1/63 patients (1.6%). Survey responses also demonstrated variation in postoperative antibiotic duration and perceptions of existing recommendations. Conclusions: Substantial center-level variation was observed in case mix, postoperative antibiotic prescribing, treatment duration, and wound-cleansing practices. Few postoperative infections were documented among patients with available follow-up; however, differences in eligibility criteria, injury complexity, and follow-up completeness preclude conclusions regarding comparative treatment effectiveness. Survey findings provided complementary evidence of variability in reported practice rather than validation of the center-level clinical findings. Prospective multicenter studies using standardized injury classification and follow-up are needed to develop more consistent, risk-based approaches to antimicrobial and wound management in hand trauma.