Patrick Starks

Patrick Starks

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 October 2019 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRolf Reichle
Rolf Reichle
QLQing Liu
Qing Liu
RKRandal D. Koster
Randal D. Koster
WCWade Crow
Wade Crow
GLGabrielle De Lannoy
Gabrielle De Lannoy
JWJeffrey Walker
Jeffrey Walker
The NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission Level‐4 Soil Moisture (L.4_SM) product provides global, 3‐hourly, 9‐km resolution estimates of surface (0–5 cm) and root zone (0–100 cm) soil moisture with a mean latency of ~2.5 days. The underlying L4_SM algorithm assimilates SMAP radiometer brightness temperature (Tb) observations into the NASA Catchment land surface model using a spatially distributed ensemble Kalman filter. In Version 4 of the L4_SM modeling system the upward recharge of surface soil moisture from below under nonequilibrium conditions was reduced, resulting in less bias and improved dynamic range of L4_SM surface soil moisture compared to earlier versions. This change and additional technical modifications to the system reduce the mean and standard deviation of the observation‐minus‐forecast Tb residuals and overall soil moisture analysis increments while maintaining the skill of the L4_SM soil moisture estimates versus independent in situ measurements; the average, bias‐adjusted root‐mean‐square error in Version 4 is 0.039 m3/m3 for surface and 0.026 m3/m3 for root zone soil moisture. Moreover, the coverage of assimilated SMAP observations in Version 4 is near global owing to the use of additional satellite Tb records for algorithm calibration. L4_SM soil moisture uncertainty estimates are biased low (by 0.01–0.02 m3/m3) against actual errors (computed versus in situ measurements). L4_SM runoff estimates, an additional product of the L4_SM algorithm, are biased low (by 35 mm/year) against streamflow measurements. Compared to Version 3, bias in Version 4 is reduced by 46% for surface soil moisture uncertainty estimates and by 33% for runoff estimates.

2 November 2021 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Andreas CollianderAndreas Colliander
Andreas Colliander
RRRolf Reichle
Rolf Reichle
WCWade Crow
Wade Crow
Michael CoshMichael Cosh
Michael Cosh
FCFan Chen
Fan Chen
SYSimon H. Yueh
Simon H. Yueh
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission has been validating its soil moisture (SM) products since the start of data production on March 31, 2015. Prior to launch, the mission defined a set of criteria for core validation sites (CVS) that enable the testing of the key mission SM accuracy requirement (unbiased root-mean-square error <0.04 m 3 /m 3 ). The validation approach also includes other (“sparse network”) in situ SM measurements, satellite SM products, model-based SM products, and field experiments. Over the past six years, the SMAP SM products have been analyzed with respect to these reference data, and the analysis approaches themselves have been scrutinized in an effort to best understand the products’ performance. Validation of the most recent SMAP Level 2 and 3 SM retrieval products (R17000) shows that the L -band (1.4 GHz) radiometer-based SM record continues to meet mission requirements. The products are generally consistent with SM retrievals from the European Space Agency Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity mission, although there are differences in some regions. The high-resolution (3-km) SM retrieval product, generated by combining Copernicus Sentinel-1 data with SMAP observations, performs within expectations. Currently, however, there is limited availability of 3-km CVS data to support extensive validation at this spatial scale. The most recent (version 5) SMAP Level 4 SM data assimilation product providing surface and root-zone SM with complete spatio–temporal coverage at 9-km resolution also meets performance requirements. The SMAP SM validation program will continue throughout the mission life; future plans include expanding it to forested and high-latitude regions.

1 December 2018 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chris B.  ZouChris B. Zou
Chris B. Zou
DTDirac Twidwell
Dirac Twidwell
CBChristine H. Bielski
Christine H. Bielski
DFDillon Fogarty
Dillon Fogarty
AMAaron Mittelstet
Aaron Mittelstet
Bharat AcharyaBharat Acharya
Bharat Acharya
In the Great Plains of the central United States, water resources for human and aquatic life rely primarily on surface runoff and local recharge from rangelands that are under rapid transformation to woodland by the encroachment of Eastern redcedar (redcedar; Juniperus virginiana) trees. In this synthesis, the current understanding and impact of redcedar encroachment on the water budget and water resources available for non-ecosystem use are reviewed. Existing studies concluded that the conversion from herbaceous-dominated rangeland to redcedar woodland increases precipitation loss to canopy interception and vegetation transpiration. The decrease of soil moisture, particularly for the subsurface soil layer, is widely documented. The depletion of soil moisture is directly related to the observed decrease in surface runoff, and the potential of deep recharge for redcedar encroached watersheds. Model simulations suggest that complete conversion of the rangelands to redcedar woodland at the watershed and basin scale in the South-central Great Plains would lead to reduced streamflow throughout the year, with the reductions of streamflow between 20 to 40% depending on the aridity of the climate of the watershed. Recommended topics for future studies include: (i) The spatial dynamics of redcedar proliferation and its impact on water budget across a regional hydrologic network; (ii) the temporal dynamics of precipitation interception by the herbaceous canopy; (iii) the impact of redcedar infilling into deciduous forests such as the Cross Timbers and its impact on water budget and water availability for non-ecosystem use; (iv) land surface and climate interaction and cross-scale hydrological modeling and forecasting; (v) impact of redcedar encroachment on sediment production and water quality; and (vi) assessment and efficacy of different redcedar control measures in restoring hydrological functions of watershed.

26 February 2007 in Grassland Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DZDuli Zhao
Duli Zhao
PSPatrick Starks
Patrick Starks
MBMichael A. Brown
Michael A. Brown
WPWilliam A. Phillips
William A. Phillips
SCSamuel W. Coleman
Samuel W. Coleman

1 March 2006 in Crop Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPatrick Starks
Patrick Starks
DZDuli Zhao
Duli Zhao
WPWilliam A. Phillips
William A. Phillips
SCSamuel W. Coleman
Samuel W. Coleman

5 May 2006 in Grass and Forage Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PSPatrick Starks
Patrick Starks
DZDuli Zhao
Duli Zhao
WPW. A. Phillips
W. A. Phillips
SCS. W. Coleman
S. W. Coleman