Dimitrios Effrosynidis

Dimitrios Effrosynidis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2022 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DEDimitrios Effrosynidis
Dimitrios Effrosynidis
AKAlexandros I. Karasakalidis
Alexandros I. Karasakalidis
GEORGIOS SYLAIOSGEORGIOS SYLAIOS
GEORGIOS SYLAIOS
AAAvi Arampatzis
Avi Arampatzis

9 March 2023 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DEDimitrios Effrosynidis
Dimitrios Effrosynidis
ESEvangelos Spiliotis
Evangelos Spiliotis
GEORGIOS SYLAIOSGEORGIOS SYLAIOS
GEORGIOS SYLAIOS
AAAvi Arampatzis
Avi Arampatzis
One of the most common and valuable applications of science to the environment is to forecast the future, as it affects human lives in many aspects. However, it is not yet clear which methods -conventional time series or regression- deliver the highest performance in univariate time series forecasting. This study attempts to answer that question with a large-scale comparative evaluation that includes 68 environmental variables over three frequencies (hourly, daily, monthly), forecasted in one to twelve steps into the future, and evaluated over six statistical time series and fourteen regression methods. Results suggest that the strongest representatives of the time series methods (ARIMA, Theta) exhibit high accuracies, but certain regression methods (Huber, Extra Trees, Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machines, Gradient Boosting Machines, Ridge, Bayesian Ridge) deliver even more promising results for all forecasting horizons. Finally, depending on the specific use case, the suitable method should be employed, as certain methods are more appropriate for different frequencies and some have an advantageous trade-off between computational time and performance.

21 September 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DEDimitrios Effrosynidis
Dimitrios Effrosynidis
GEORGIOS SYLAIOSGEORGIOS SYLAIOS
GEORGIOS SYLAIOS
AAAvi Arampatzis
Avi Arampatzis
How do climate change deniers differ from believers? Is there any correlation between human sentiment and deviations from historic temperature? We answer nine such questions using 13 years of Twitter data and 15 million tweets. Seven aspects are explored, namely, user gender, climate change stance and sentiment, aggressiveness, deviations from historic temperature, topics discussed, and environmental disaster events. We found that: a) climate change deniers use the term global warming much often than believers and use aggressive language, while believers tweet more about taking actions to fight the phenomenon, b) deniers are more present in the American Region, South Africa, Japan, and Eastern China and less present in Europe, India, and Central Africa, c) people connect much more the warm temperatures with man-made climate change than cold temperatures, d) the same regions that had more climate change deniers also tweet with negative sentiment, e) a positive correlation is observed between human sentiment and deviations from historic temperature; when the deviation is between −1.143°C and +2.401°C, people tweet the most positive, f) there exist 90% correlation between sentiment and stance, and -94% correlation between sentiment and aggressiveness, g) no clear patterns are observed to correlate sentiment and stance with disaster events based on total deaths, number of affected, and damage costs, h) topics discussed on Twitter indicate that climate change is a politicized issue and people are expressing their concerns especially when witnessing extreme weather; the global stance could be considered optimistic, as there are many discussions that point out the importance of human intervention to fight climate change and actions are being taken through events to raise the awareness of this phenomenon.

13 December 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DEDimitrios Effrosynidis
Dimitrios Effrosynidis
Athanassios TsiklirasAthanassios Tsikliras
Athanassios Tsikliras
AAAvi Arampatzis
Avi Arampatzis
GEORGIOS SYLAIOSGEORGIOS SYLAIOS
GEORGIOS SYLAIOS
In this work a fish species distribution model (SDM) was developed, by merging species occurrence data with environmental layers, with the scope to produce high resolution habitability maps for the whole Mediterranean Sea. The final model is capable to predict the probability of occurrence of each fish species at any location in the Mediterranean Sea. Eight pelagic, commercial fish species were selected for this study namely Engraulis encrasicolus, Sardina pilchardus, Sardinella aurita, Scomber colias, Scomber scombrus, Spicara smaris, Thunnus thynnus and Xiphias gladius. The SDM environmental predictors were obtained from the databases of Copernicus Marine Environmental Service (CMEMS) and the European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet). The probabilities of fish occurrence data in low resolution and with several gaps were obtained from Aquamaps (FAO Fishbase). Data pre-processing involved feature engineering to construct 6830 features, representing the distribution of several mean-monthly environmental variables, covering a time-span of 10 years. Feature selection with the ensemble Reciprocal Ranking method was used to rank the features according to their relative importance. This technique increased model’s performance by 34%. Ten machine learning algorithms were then applied and tested based on their overall performance per species. The XGBoost algorithm performed better and was used as the final model. Feature categories were explored, with neighbor-based, extreme values, monthly and surface ones contributing most to the model. Environmental variables like salinity, temperature, distance to coast, dissolved oxygen and nitrate were found the strongest ones in predicting the probability of occurrence for the above eight species.

1 January 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
SSSymeon Symeonidis
Symeon Symeonidis
DEDimitrios Effrosynidis
Dimitrios Effrosynidis
JKJohn Kordonis
John Kordonis
AAAvi Arampatzis
Avi Arampatzis

1 August 2019 in Data in Brief
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DEDimitrios Effrosynidis
Dimitrios Effrosynidis
AAAvi Arampatzis
Avi Arampatzis
GSGeorgios Sylaios
Georgios Sylaios
The dataset includes 1,771 locations of major seagrass families (Cymodoceaceae, Zosteraceae, Posidoniaceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Ruppiaceae), which are further divided into the species they include, as well as 1,284 locations of seagrass absence (algorithmically produced), in the Mediterranean Sea. For each location, 217 biological, chemical, physics, and human related parameters are available, which were merged from other publicly available data sources. As the most comprehensive dataset for seagrass in the Mediterranean to date, it is suitable for data analysis and machine learning. For more insight, please see "Seagrass Detection in the Mediterranean: A Supervised Learning Approach" (Effrosynidis et al., 2018). The dataset is available on Mendeley Data (Effrosynidis, 2019).