Cunyong JU

Dr. Cunyong JU


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2019 in Journal of Forestry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MYMiao Yang
Miao Yang
TCTijiu Cai
Tijiu Cai
CJCunyong JU
Cunyong JU
HZHongfei Zou
Hongfei Zou

30 October 2021 in Journal of Forestry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHoucai Sheng
Houcai Sheng
NGNa Guo
Na Guo
CJCunyong JU
Cunyong JU
TCTijiu Cai
Tijiu Cai

18 September 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jin ZhangJin Zhang
Jin Zhang
CJCunyong JU
Cunyong JU
TCTijiu Cai
Tijiu Cai
HSHoucai Sheng
Houcai Sheng
XJXia Jing
Xia Jing
Protected areas (PAs) play a crucial role in safeguarding biological resources and preserving ecosystems. However, the lack of standardized and highly operational criteria for evaluating their conservation effectiveness, particularly across different ecological types, remains a significant gap in the literature. This study aims to address this gap by constructing a conservation effectiveness evaluation model for two distinct types of PAs in Heilongjiang Province, China: the Zhalong National Nature Reserve (ZlNNR), a wetland ecological reserve; and the Mudanfeng National Nature Reserve (MdfNNR), a forest ecological reserve. We employed various methods, including land use dynamic index, visual analysis of landscape patterns, remote sensing inversion, and a multi-factor comprehensive assessment model, to assess changes in conservation effectiveness from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a contrast between the two PAs. In the ZlNNR, croplands and water bodies increased significantly by 4069.4 ha (K = 1.5820%) and 2541.58 ha (K = 3.2692%). In the MdfNNR, impervious lands increased greatly by 65.35 ha (K = 7.4021%), whereas forest lands decreased by 125 ha (K = −0.067%). The core area of the two PAs displayed increased landscape regularity, whereas the experimental area showed heightened landscape diversity. In ZlNNR, the MPSL value increased by 134.91%, whereas the PDL value decreased by 57.43%, indicating a more regular landscape pattern. In MdfNNR, the SHDIL value decreased by 110.7%, whereas the PDL value increased by 52.55%, indicating a more fragmented landscape pattern. The area with improved vegetation trends in ZlNNR was 8.59% larger than in MdfNNR, whereas the area with degraded vegetation trends was 4.86% smaller than in MdfNNR. In all years, the high effectiveness area was larger in ZlNNR than in MdfNNR, whereas the medium and low effectiveness areas were smaller in ZlNNR compared to MdfNNR. This study provides a scientifically rigorous assessment method for evaluating the conservation effectiveness of different types of PAs, laying a solid theoretical foundation and practical guidance for future conservation strategies.

20 December 2023 in Plant, Soil and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCShiyi Chen
Shiyi Chen
CJCunyong JU
Cunyong JU
YDYang Du
Yang Du
TMTianqi Mu
Tianqi Mu
TCTijiu Cai
Tijiu Cai
This work discusses the differences in the removal efficiency of heavy metals in soils along the China-Russia crude oil pipeline in different vegetation backgrounds. In this paper, two representative forest types, birch forest and larch forest...