Zhi WANG

Dr. Zhi WANG

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 January 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZJZhifeng JIA
Zhifeng JIA
Zhi WANGZhi WANG
Zhi WANG
HWHao Wang
Hao Wang
Compared to rain, dew is an important supplementary source of water for the survival of certain plants and animals in drylands. However, the hydrology of dew has not yet been fully investigated due to difficulties in measuring the amount and duration of it. In this study, a 3-year in-situ monitoring experiment was conducted from 2014 to 2016 in the semi-arid Sanyuan County, Shaanxi Province of China, using a leaf wetness sensor (LWS) and four associated meteorological instruments. Results showed that the average annual total dewfall was 32.8 mm with a daily maximum of 0.88 mm. The majority of daily dew occurred in the night from 18:00 to 8:00 with the maximum condensation rate occurring at around 4:00. The maximum dew residence time was about 18 h/day on the dew days in all seasons. However, the actual dew production period was about 14 h in spring (March–May), autumn (September–November), and winter (December–February), and only 11 h in summer (June–August). The maximum intensity and amount of dew always occurred in autumn (with an average amount of 12.2 mm or 37% of the annual total), followed closely by spring (11.4 mm, 35%), with much less in summer (6.6 mm, 20%) and winter (2.6 mm, 8%). The annual dew distribution by months showed a double crest variation, with two peaks in April–May and October–November, and two valleys in January–February and July. Comparatively, annual dewfall is only about 1/18th of the rainfall in this region, but the number of dew days (224 days, or 61% of year) is 2.6 times that of rain days (87 days, 24%), making dew a critical supplementary source of water for mitigating dry periods and supporting native plants and animals. Rain and dew are highly complementary as dew occurs in cloudless nights while the rain occurs in different and on much fewer occasions in the region. The dew amount was highly and positively correlated to the relative humidity of the air above the threshold of 81% (r = 0.78, p < 0.01), negatively correlated to the difference between air temperature Ta and dewpoint Td, when (Ta − Td) is less than 4 °C (r = −0.66, p < 0.01), and weakly correlated to wind speed (0.2 to 2 m·s−1), wind direction, surface soil moisture, and temperature. In the Sanyuan region, two general wind directions, 30°–90°and 210°–270°, were more favorable for the formation of dew.

1 April 2003 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Zhi WANGZhi WANG
Zhi WANG
LWLaosheng Wu
Laosheng Wu
THThomas Harter
Thomas Harter
JLJianhang Lu
Jianhang Lu
WJWilliam A. Jury
William A. Jury

1 May 2004 in Vadose Zone Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Zhi WANGZhi WANG
Zhi WANG
WJWilliam A. Jury
William A. Jury
ATAtac Tuli
Atac Tuli
DKDong‐Ju Kim
Dong‐Ju Kim

4 December 2012 in Hydrology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZHZili He
Zili He
Zhi WANGZhi WANG
Zhi WANG
CSC. John Suen
C. John Suen
XMXiaoyi Ma
Xiaoyi Ma
To examine the hydrological system sensitivity of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains of California to climate change scenarios (CCS), five headwater basins in the snow-dominated Upper San Joaquin River Watershed (USJRW) were selected for hydrologic simulations using the Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF) model. A pre-specified set of CCS as projected by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were adopted as inputs for the hydrologic analysis. These scenarios include temperature increases between 1.5 and 4.5 °C and precipitation variation between 80 and 120% of the baseline conditions. The HSPF model was calibrated and validated with measured historical data. It was then used to simulate the hydrologic responses of the watershed to the projected CCS. Results indicate that the streamflow of USJRW is sensitive to the projected climate change. The total volume of annual streamflow would vary between −41 and +16% compared to the baseline years (1970–1990). Even if the precipitation remains unchanged, the total annual flow would still decrease by 8–23% due to temperature increases. A larger portion of the streamflow would occur earlier in the water year by 15–46 days due to the temperature increases, causing higher seasonal variability of streamflow.

15 June 2023 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZJZhifeng JIA
Zhifeng JIA
RLRui Lei
Rui Lei
YLYu Liu
Yu Liu
PLPengcheng Liu
Pengcheng Liu
Zhi WANGZhi WANG
Zhi WANG
WWWei Wei
Wei Wei
To determine the spatial–temporal variations and the factors leading to vegetation recovery in the loess hilly and gully region of China, this study analyzed a two-decade trend in the variation of vegetation cover based on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data from 1998 to 2019 using the Sen + MK test and Hurst index and determined the driving factors using the Geodetector model. The vegetation index in the area was high in the southeast and low in the northwest, with an overall increasing rate of 0.0108/year. The areas with significant improvement in vegetation cover accounted for 95.14%, and the areas with persistent change accounted for 37.36%. Annual precipitation is the most crucial factor driving the NDVI change, and potential evapotranspiration, relative humidity, elevation, land use type, and vegetation type can also explain local variations. The effect of compound factors is significantly greater than that of a single factor. The most effective factors are annual precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, relative humidity and elevation, which varied between 559.4–698.6 mm, 530.6–744.6 mm, 59%–62%, and 2006–2717 m, respectively. The land use, vegetation, and soil types suitable for healthy vegetation growth are forest, coniferous forest, and eluvial soil.

19 May 2024 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LZLuyao Zhang
Luyao Zhang
Zhi WANGZhi WANG
Zhi WANG
ZHZili He
Zili He
XMXiaojuan Ma
Xiaojuan Ma
BMBo Ma
Bo Ma
JHJinyu He
Jinyu He
Gravel-sand mulch (GSM) and plastic film mulch (PFM) are important ways of farming in cold and arid regions without irrigation. Nevertheless, there has been a lack of studies of the system response to live weather conditions. To quantify the effects of GSM and PFM on soil moisture and temperature retention, in-situ monitoring experiments were carried out in the arid belt of central Ningxia, China, using continuous monitoring of the field soil water and meteorological conditions at a 30-mimute time-step under three treatments: a bare soil (CK), soil covered by a layer of GSM, and soil covered by GSM and a layer of plastic film (i.e., GSM + PFM). Results show that: (1) With a limited precipitation of 221 mm during the growing season, the average volumetric soil water content (SWC) in the top 30-cm soil layer was lowest for CK, medium high for GSM, and highest for GSM + PFM. Compared to CK, the soil water storage increased by 54 % under GSM and 75.2 % under GSM + PFM; (2) The most frequently occurring low-intensity rainfalls are more efficiently stored in soil under GSM + PFM; (3) Similarly, the soil temperature was significantly increased under GSM and GSM + PFM conditions. Compared to CK, the average soil temperature in the top 5-cm layer increased by 2.5 °C under GSM and 4.8 °C under GSM + PFM during the germination period, which had effectively extended the growing season for about 30 and 50 days, respectively; (4) Although dewfall is only 4 % of rainfall, the total number of dew day was more than twice that of rain day. Thus, dewfall is a more frequent and dependable source of water for native plants and animals. Our results demonstrate that the benefits of GSM and PFM can be applied globally where either insufficient rainfall or low temperatures are limiting factors.