Background Recently introduced photon-counting CT may improve noninvasive assessment of patients with high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in the detection of CAD compared with the reference standard of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with severe aortic valve stenosis and clinically indicated CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning were consecutively enrolled from August 2022 to February 2023. All participants were examined with a dual-source photon-counting CT scanner using a retrospective electrocardiography-gated contrast-enhanced UHR scanning protocol (tube voltage, 120 or 140 kV; collimation, 120 × 0.2 mm; 100 mL of iopromid; no spectral information). Subjects underwent ICA as part of their clinical routine. A consensus assessment of image quality (five-point Likert scale: 1 = excellent [absence of artifacts], 5 = nondiagnostic [severe artifacts]) and a blinded independent reading for the presence of CAD (stenosis ≥50%) were performed. UHR CCTA was compared with ICA using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Among 68 participants (mean age, 81 years ± 7 [SD]; 32 male, 36 female), the prevalence of CAD and prior stent placement was 35% and 22%, respectively. The overall image quality was excellent (median score, 1.5 [IQR, 1.3-2.0]). The AUC of UHR CCTA in the detection of CAD was 0.93 per participant (95% CI: 0.86, 0.99), 0.94 per vessel (95% CI: 0.91, 0.98), and 0.92 per segment (95% CI: 0.87, 0.97). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, were 96%, 84%, and 88% per participant (n = 68); 89%, 91%, and 91% per vessel (n = 204); and 77%, 95%, and 95% per segment (n = 965). Conclusion UHR photon-counting CCTA provided high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of CAD in a high-risk population, including subjects with severe coronary calcification or prior stent placement. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Williams and Newby in this issue.

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the diagnostic image quality of spectral dual-source photon-counting detector coronary computed tomography angiography (PCD-CCTA) for coronary artery disease in a multicenter study. The image quality (IQ), assessability, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), Agatston score, and radiation exposure were measured. Stenoses were quantified and compared with invasive coronary angiography, if available. A total of 92 subjects (65% male, age 58 ± 14 years) were analyzed. The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) (stenosis ≥ 50%) was 17% of all patients, the range of the Agatston score was 0–2965 (interquartile range (IQR) 0–135). The IQ was very good (one, IQR one–two), the CNR was very high (20 ± 10), and 5% of the segments were rated non-diagnostic. The IQ and assessability were higher in proximal coronary segments (p < 0.001). Agatston scores up to 600 did not significantly affect the assessability of the coronary segments (p = 0.3). Heart rate influenced assessability only at a high-pitch mode (p = 0.009). For the invasive coronary angiography (ICA) subgroup (n = nine), the diagnostic performance for CAD per segment was high (sensitivity 92%, specificity 96%), although the limited number of patients who underwent both diagnostic modalities limits the generalization of this finding at this stage. PCD-CCTA provides good image quality for low and moderate levels of coronary calcifications.

Background To assess the additive value of dual-energy CT (DECT) over single-energy CT (SECT) to radiomics-based response prediction in patients with metastatic melanoma preceding immunotherapy. Material and methods A total of 140 consecutive patients with melanoma (58 female, 63±16 years) for whom baseline DECT tumor load assessment revealed stage IV and who were subsequently treated with immunotherapy were included. Best response was determined using the clinical reports (81 responders: 27 complete response, 45 partial response, 9 stable disease). Individual lesion response was classified manually analogous to RECIST 1.1 through 1291 follow-up examinations on a total of 776 lesions (6.7±7.2 per patient). The patients were sorted chronologically into a study and a validation cohort (each n=70). The baseline DECT was examined using specialized tumor segmentation prototype software, and radiomic features were analyzed for response predictors. Significant features were selected using univariate statistics with Bonferroni correction and multiple logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the best subset was computed (AUROC). For each combination (SECT/DECT and patient response/lesion response), an individual random forest classifier with 10-fold internal cross-validation was trained on the study cohort and tested on the validation cohort to confirm the predictive performance. Results We performed manual RECIST 1.1 response analysis on a total of 6533 lesions. Multivariate statistics selected significant features for patient response in SECT (min. brightness, R²=0.112, padj. ≤0.001) and DECT (textural coarseness, R²=0.121, padj. ≤0.001), as well as lesion response in SECT (mean absolute voxel intensity deviation, R²=0.115, padj. ≤0.001) and DECT (iodine uptake metrics, R²≥0.12, padj. ≤0.001). Applying the machine learning models to the validation cohort confirmed the additive predictive power of DECT (patient response AUROC SECT=0.5, DECT=0.75; lesion response AUROC SECT=0.61, DECT=0.85; p<0.001). Conclusion The new method of DECT-specific radiomic analysis provides a significant additive value over SECT radiomics approaches for response prediction in patients with metastatic melanoma preceding immunotherapy, especially on a lesion-based level. As mixed tumor response is not uncommon in metastatic melanoma, this lends a powerful tool for clinical decision-making and may potentially be an essential step toward individualized medicine.

Our aim was to compare the image quality and patient dose of contrast-enhanced oncologic chest-CT of a first-generation photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) and a second-generation dual-source dual-energy CT (DSCT). For this reason, one hundred consecutive oncologic patients (63 male, 65 ± 11 years, BMI: 16–42 kg/m²) were prospectively enrolled and evaluated. Clinically indicated contrast-enhanced chest-CT were obtained with PCD-CT and compared to previously obtained chest-DSCT in the same individuals. The median time interval between the scans was three months. The same contrast media protocol was used for both scans. PCD-CT was performed in QuantumPlus mode (obtaining full spectral information) at 120 kVp. DSCT was performed using 100 kV for Tube A and 140 kV for Tube B. “T3D” PCD-CT images were evaluated, which emulate conventional 120 keV polychromatic images. For DSCT, the convolution algorithm was set at I31f with class 1 iterative reconstruction, whereas comparable Br40 kernel and iterative reconstruction strengths (Q1 and Q3) were applied for PCD-CT. Two radiologists assessed image quality using a five-point Likert scale and performed measurements of vessels and lung parenchyma for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and in the case of pulmonary metastases tumor-to-lung parenchyma contrast ratio. PCD-CT CNR_vessel was significantly higher than DSCT CNR_vessel (all, p < 0.05). Readers rated image contrast of mediastinum, vessels, and lung parenchyma significantly higher in PCD-CT than DSCT images (p < 0.001). Q3 PCD-CT CNR_{lung_parenchyma} was significantly higher than DSCT CNR_{lung_parenchyma} and Q1 PCD-CT CNR_{lung_parenchyma} (p < 0.01). The tumor-to-lung parenchyma contrast ratio was significantly higher on PCD-CT than DSCT images (0.08 ± 0.04 vs. 0.03 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). CTDI, DLP, SSDE mean values for PCD-CT and DSCT were 4.17 ± 1.29 mGy vs. 7.21 ± 0.49 mGy, 151.01 ± 48.56 mGy * cm vs. 288.64 ± 31.17 mGy * cm and 4.23 ± 0.97 vs. 7.48 ± 1.09, respectively. PCD-CT enables oncologic chest-CT with a significantly reduced dose while maintaining image quality similar to a second-generation DSCT for comparable protocol settings.

Background Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) is a promising new technology with the potential to fundamentally change today’s workflows in the daily routine and to provide new quantitative imaging information to improve clinical decision-making and patient management. Method The content of this review is based on an unrestricted literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms “Photon-Counting CT”, “Photon-Counting detector”, “spectral CT”, “Computed Tomography” as well as on the authors’ experience. Results The fundamental difference with respect to the currently established energy-integrating CT detectors is that PCCT allows counting of every single photon at the detector level. Based on the identified literature, PCCT phantom measurements and initial clinical studies have demonstrated that the new technology allows improved spatial resolution, reduced image noise, and new possibilities for advanced quantitative image postprocessing. Conclusion For clinical practice, the potential benefits include fewer beam hardening artifacts, radiation dose reduction, and the use of new contrast agents. In this review, we will discuss basic technical principles and potential clinical benefits and demonstrate first clinical use cases. Key Points: Citation Format

Background Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a promising new technology with the potential to fundamentally change workflows in the daily routine and provide new quantitative imaging information to improve clinical decision-making and patient management. Method The contents of this review are based on an unrestricted literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms “photon-counting CT”, “photon-counting detector”, “spectral CT”, “computed tomography” as well as on the authors’ own experience. Results The fundamental difference with respect to the currently established energy-integrating CT detectors is that PCD-CT allows for the counting of every single photon at the detector level. Based on the identified literature, PCD-CT phantom measurements and initial clinical studies have demonstrated that the new technology allows for improved spatial resolution, reduced image noise, and new possibilities for advanced quantitative image postprocessing. Conclusion For clinical practice, the potential benefits include fewer beam hardening artifacts, a radiation dose reduction, and the use of new or combinations of contrast agents. In particular, critical patient groups such as oncological, cardiovascular, lung, and head & neck as well as pediatric patient collectives benefit from the clinical advantages. Key Points: Citation Format