Ahmet Kırgız

Dr. Ahmet Kırgız

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2019 in Eye and Vision
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAhmet Kırgız
Ahmet Kırgız
MEMustafa Eliacik
Mustafa Eliacik
YYYusuf Yildirim
Yusuf Yildirim
To compare the outcomes of two different protocols of accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) on visual, corneal high order aberrations (HOA) and topographic parameters in patients with progressive keratoconus. In this prospective comparative study, sixty-six eyes of 66 patients with progressive keratoconus were divided into two groups; 37 eyes in Group 1 received 18 mW/cm2 for five minutes, and 29 eyes in Group 2 were treated with 9 mW/cm2 for 10 min. The uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCVA), corneal HOAs and topography parameters were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at the end of 12 months. The data for the two groups were compared statistically. The mean UCVA and BCVA were significantly improved at the postoperative 12 months compared with the preoperative values in both groups (P < 0.05 for all). A significant improvement in corneal HOAs was observed in both groups (P < 0.05 for all). The change in corneal coma value was significantly higher in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The change in keratometric values K1, K2, AvgK and maximum keratometry (AKf) were significantly higher in Group 2 (P < 0.05 for all). The regression model showed that the most important factor predicting the change in AKf was the type of CXL (β = − 0.482, P = 0.005). Accelerated CXL using 10 min of UVA irradiance at 9 mW/cm2 showed better topographic improvements and coma values than five minutes of UVA irradiance at 18 mW/cm2 independent of keratoconus severity.

26 July 2020 in International Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SÇSemih Çakmak
Semih Çakmak
MSMehmet Emin Sucu
Mehmet Emin Sucu
YYYusuf Yildirim
Yusuf Yildirim
BYBurcin Kepez Yildiz
Burcin Kepez Yildiz
AKAhmet Kırgız
Ahmet Kırgız
ADAhmet Demirok
Ahmet Demirok

27 June 2024 in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAhmet Kırgız
Ahmet Kırgız
BABurcu Kemer Atik
Burcu Kemer Atik
MEMerve Emul
Merve Emul
MTMuhittin Taskapili
Muhittin Taskapili
Background: To evaluate the results of corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segment (CAIRS) implantation in keratoconus.Methods: The medical records of patients with keratoconus who underwent CAIRS implantation were reviewed. The CAIRS, prepared by trephination from the donor cornea, was implanted into a tunnel created using the femtosecond laser. The depth of the tunnel was 200 μ; the inner diameter of the tunnel was 4.5 mm; and the outer diameter was 7 mm. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry, minimum corneal thickness (CT), endothelial cell density (ECD), and high order aberration values were recorded preoperatively and at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months postoperatively.Results: A total of 23 eyes of 23 patients were included in the study. Preoperative UCVA (0.08 ± 0.01) and BCVA (0.25 ± 0. 11) values improved postoperatively and reached 0.40 ± 0.05 and 0.68 ± 0.09, respectively, at the end of the 6‐month follow‐up period (p1 < 0.001, p2 = 0.016; respectively). A statistically significant flattening of all keratometric values was observed in the postoperative period compared to preoperatively (p < 0.001 for all). There were no statistical differences between CT and ECC values at the preoperative and postoperative visits (p1 = 0.654, p2 = 0.769; respectively). In addition, coma aberration values were lower than the preoperative values at all postoperative visits (p < 0.05 for all).Conclusions: These results suggest that CAIRS implantation is a safe treatment option with good visual and keratometric outcomes for suitable patients with keratoconus.

1 January 2016 in Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAhmet Kırgız
Ahmet Kırgız
KAKürşat Atalay
Kürşat Atalay
KÇKübra Şerefoğlu Çabuk
Kübra Şerefoğlu Çabuk
HKHavva Kaldırım
Havva Kaldırım
MTMuhittin Taşkapılı
Muhittin Taşkapılı
The present study aimed to report the outcomes of patients with progressive keratoconus who were treated via accelerated crosslinking (CXL) 6 months earlier and to determine the factors that promoted improved visual acuity after treatment. This retrospective study included 35 eyes of 34 patients with progressive keratoconus who underwent CXL. Topographical measurements were obtained preoperatively and in the first, third, and sixth months postoperatively using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), flat keratometry (K) value (K1), steep K value (K2), average K value (avgK), topographic cylindrical value (Cyl), apical keratoscopy front (AKf), apical keratoscopy back (AKb), symmetry index front (SIf), symmetry index back (SIb), and thinnest point of the cornea (ThkMin) were recorded. At the 6-month follow-up, the mean UCVA and BCVA values were improved, and the K values remained stable. Statistically significant decreases in AKf (p=0.04) and the thinnest point of the cornea (p=0.001) and a statistically significant increase in AKb (p=0.01) were observed. A correlation analysis revealed that the preoperative BCVA, UCVA, K1, K2, avgK, AKf, and AKb values significantly affected visual acuity at the 6-month follow-up. Accelerated CXL is an effective treatment for the prevention or even reversal of keratoconus progression. The preoperative K values and apexes of the anterior and posterior cornea were found to affect visual acuity at 6 months after accelerated CXL. Both AKb steepening and AKf flattening appear to be important factors in the stabilization of keratometric values and improvement of visual outcomes.

1 April 2020 in Optometry and Vision Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAhmet Kırgız
Ahmet Kırgız
MAMehmet Orcun Akdemir
Mehmet Orcun Akdemir
AYAhu Yilmaz
Ahu Yilmaz
HKHavva Kaldirim
Havva Kaldirim
KAKürşat Atalay
Kürşat Atalay
SNSenay Asik Nacaroglu
Senay Asik Nacaroglu

6 April 2017 in Medical Hypotheses
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKürşat Atalay
Kürşat Atalay
HEHavva Kaldirim Erdogan
Havva Kaldirim Erdogan
AKAhmet Kırgız
Ahmet Kırgız
SNSenay Asik Nacaroglu
Senay Asik Nacaroglu