In recent years, there has been major interest in the exposure to physical therapy during rehabilitation. Several publications have demonstrated its usefulness in clinical/medical and human machine interface (HMI) applications. An automated system will guide the user to perform the training during rehabilitation independently. Advances in engineering have extended electromyography (EMG) beyond the traditional diagnostic applications to also include applications in diverse areas such as movement analysis. This paper gives an overview of the numerous methods available to recognize motion patterns of EMG signals for both isotonic and isometric contractions. Various signal analysis methods are compared by illustrating their applicability in real-time settings. This paper will be of interest to researchers who would like to select the most appropriate methodology in classifying motion patterns, especially during different types of contractions. For feature extraction, the probability density function (PDF) of EMG signals will be the main interest of this study. Following that, a brief explanation of the different methods for pre-processing, feature extraction and classifying EMG signals will be compared in terms of their performance. The crux of this paper is to review the most recent developments and research studies related to the issues mentioned above.

In order to analyse surface electromyography (EMG) signals, it is necessary to extract the features based on a time or frequency domain. These approaches are based on the mathematical assumption of signal stationarity. Stationarity of EMG signals is thoroughly examined, especially in isotonic contractions. According to research, conflicting results have been identified depending on varying window sizes. Therefore, in this study, the authors endeavoured to determine the suitable window size to analyse EMG signals during isotonic contractions utilising stationary tests, reverse arrangement (RA), and modified reverse arrangement (MRA). There were slight differences in the average percentages of signal stationarity for RA and MRA tests in 100 ms, 500 ms, and 1000 ms window sizes. However, there was none for the 200 ms window size. On average, a window size of 200 ms provided stationary information with 88.57% of EMG signals compared to other window sizes. This study also recommended the MRA test to determine EMG signals stationarity for future studies, as the performances were better in comparison to RA tests. However, the following recommendation is only valid for window sizes greater than 200 ms. For a real-time application, the size of the analysis window together with the processing time should be less than 300 ms and a window size of 200 ms is applicable for isotonic contractions.

In recent years, the Body Weight Support system has been considered to be an indispensable component in gait training systems, which be used to improve the ability to walk of hemiplegic, stroke, and spinal cord injury patients. Previous studies investigated the influence of the Body Weight Support system on gait parameters were based on the implementation with healthy subjects or patients with high assistance. Consequently, the influences of the Body Weight Support systems on gait rehabilitation in clinical practice are still unclear and need further investigation. In this study, we investigated the effects of the two Body Weight Support systems, the active body weight support system and the Counter Weight system, on an abnormal gait, which was generated by restriction of the right knee joint and 3 kg-weight on the right ankle joint. Both Body Weight Support systems improve the gait parameters of the abnormal gait such as the center of mass, the center of pressure, margin of stability, and step parameters. The active Body Weight Support system with the unloading force modulation showed more advanced and better behavior in comparison with the Counter Weight system. The results suggested the applicability of two Body Weight Support systems in clinical practice as a recovered gait intervention.

Background/Objectives: Statistical shape modeling (SSM) is used to describe transtibial residual-limb morphology for prosthetic socket design, simulation, and future structural testing. However, conventional intrinsic metrics such as compactness, generality, and specificity may not directly reflect geometric fidelity to the original shape. This study examined the relationship between geometric fidelity and SSM evaluation and assessed a cross-sectional shape representation framework for transtibial residual limbs. Methods: Residual-limb surfaces were acquired from 62 adults with unilateral transtibial amputation using a structured-light 3D scanner while preserving habitual limb posture. Two surface-based registration methods, non-rigid iterative closest point and Bayesian coherent point drift, were compared with a cross-sectional representation in which proximal and distal regions were sectioned separately and reconstructed by strip triangulation. Geometric fidelity to the original mesh was quantified using average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). SSM performance was evaluated using compactness, generality, and specificity. Results: The optimal cross-sectional configuration was 60 sections × 72 points. The proposed method showed the best geometric fidelity (ASSD, 1.30 ± 0.14 mm), followed by Bayesian coherent point drift (1.33 ± 0.14 mm) and non-rigid iterative closest point (1.48 ± 0.48 mm). Compactness was highest for the proposed method, reaching 95% cumulative variance in four modes, compared with five and seven modes, respectively, for the two surface-based methods. In geometry-space evaluation, the proposed method showed the lowest specificity error, while differences in generality were statistically significant but small in magnitude. Conclusions: Intrinsic SSM metrics alone were insufficient to judge registration quality in transtibial residual-limb modeling. The cross-sectional representation preserved the original surface geometry more faithfully than the evaluated surface-based methods while maintaining competitive SSM performance.