Tanya Park

Prof. Tanya Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2017 in Collegian
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLea M. Budden
Lea M. Budden
MBMelanie Birks
Melanie Birks
RCRobyn P. Cant
Robyn P. Cant
TBTracy Bagley
Tracy Bagley
TPTanya Park
Tanya Park

1 February 2018 in Collegian
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMelanie Birks
Melanie Birks
LBLea M. Budden
Lea M. Budden
NBNarelle Biedermann
Narelle Biedermann
TPTanya Park
Tanya Park
YCYsanne Chapman
Ysanne Chapman

1 December 2015 in Collegian
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWCindy Woods
Cindy Woods
CWCaryn West
Caryn West
JMJane Mills
Jane Mills
TPTanya Park
Tanya Park
Joanne (Jo) SouthernJoanne (Jo) Southern
Joanne (Jo) Southern
KUKim Usher
Kim Usher

14 September 2012 in Journal of Advanced Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KUKim Usher
Kim Usher
TPTanya Park
Tanya Park
KFKim Foster
Kim Foster
PBPetra Buettner
Petra Buettner
Aim: To test the effect of a nurse‐led intervention on weight gain in people with serious mental illness prescribed and taking second generation antipsychotic medication.Background: Weight gain and obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the general population with the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome reaching 20–25% of the global population. People with serious mental illness are at even higher risk, particularly those taking second generation antipsychotic medication.Design: An experimental randomized controlled trial was undertaken.Method: The control group received a 12‐week healthy lifestyle booklet. In addition to the booklet, the intervention group received weekly nutrition and exercise education, exercise sessions, and nurse support. Participants (n = 101) were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. Data were collected between March 2008–December 2010. Seven outcome measures were used: body measurements included girth (cm), weight (kg), height (cm), and body mass index (kg/m2); questionnaires included the medication compliance questionnaire, the Drug Attitude Inventory, the Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36. Differences in primary outcome measures between baseline and 12 weeks follow‐up were compared between intervention and control groups using standard bi‐variate statistical tests. The study was conducted between 2008–2010.Results: The analysis of outcome measures for the control group (n = 50) and intervention group (n = 51) was not statistically significant. There was a mean weight change of −0·74 kg at 12 weeks for the intervention group (n = 51), while the control group (n = 50) had a mean weight change of −0·17 kg at 12 weeks.Conclusion: The results were not statistically significant.

4 March 2019 in Nursing in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJSameera Jagan
Sameera Jagan
TPTanya Park
Tanya Park
EPElisavet Papathanasoglou
Elisavet Papathanasoglou

12 May 2011 in International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTanya Park
Tanya Park
KUKim Usher
Kim Usher
KFKim Foster
Kim Foster