Vladimir Siplivy

Dr. Vladimir Siplivy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 May 2017 in Journal of Biophotonics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vladimir Y. ZaitsevVladimir Y. Zaitsev
Vladimir Y. Zaitsev
AMAlexander L. Matveyev
Alexander L. Matveyev
LMLev A Matveev
Lev A Matveev
GGGrigory V. Gelikonov
Grigory V. Gelikonov
AOAlexander I. Omelchenko
Alexander I. Omelchenko
ESEmil N. Sobol
Emil N. Sobol

11 November 2018 in Journal of Biophotonics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vladimir Y. ZaitsevVladimir Y. Zaitsev
Vladimir Y. Zaitsev
AMAlexander L. Matveyev
Alexander L. Matveyev
LMLev A Matveev
Lev A Matveev
GGGrigory Gelikonov
Grigory Gelikonov
OBOlga I. Baum
Olga I. Baum
ESEmil N. Sobol
Emil N. Sobol

1 July 2010 in Journal of Refractive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sergei AvetisovSergei Avetisov
Sergei Avetisov
INIvan Novikov
Ivan Novikov
IBIrina A. Bubnova
Irina A. Bubnova
AAAlexei A. Antonov
Alexei A. Antonov
VSVladimir Siplivy
Vladimir Siplivy
Biomechanics Sergei E. Avetisov, MD, PhD; Ivan A. Novikov; Irina A. Bubnova, MD; Alexei A. Antonov, MD; Vladimir I. Siplivyi, MD To propose a new approach for the study of corneal biomechanics using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) database, which is based on changes in velocity retardation in the central cornea at the peak of flattening. The ORA applanation curve was analyzed using a mathematical technique, which allowed calculation of the elasticity coefficient (Ke), which is primarily characteristic of the elastic properties of the cornea. Elasticity coefficient values were obtained in patients with presumably different biomechanical properties of the cornea: “normal” cornea (71 eyes, normal group), keratoconus (34 eyes, keratoconus group), LASIK (36 eyes, LASIK group), and glaucoma with elevated and compensated intraocular pressure (IOP) (38 eyes, glaucoma group). The mean Ke value in the normal group was 11.05±1.6, and the corneal thickness correlation coefficient r2 was 0.48. In the keratoconus group, the mean Ke value was 4.91±1.87 and the corneal thickness correlation coefficient r2 was 0.47. In the LASIK group, Ke and r2 were 5.99±1.18 and 0.39, respectively. In the glaucoma group, the same eyes that experienced a two-fold reduction in IOP developed a statistically significant reduction in the Ke (1.06 times lower), whereas their corneal hysteresis value increased 1.25 times. The elasticity coefficient calculated using the ORA applanation curve can be used in the evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties. From the Research Institute of Eye Diseases of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, “Elaboration of methods of mathematical simulation, of experimental and clinical research of biomechanical (strength) properties of cornea” (07-04-01710-a). The authors have no financial interest in the materials presented herein. Correspondence: Irina A. Bubnova, MD, 11-a Rossolimo St, Moscow, Russia, 119021. Tel: 79166209921; Fax: 74992480125; E-mail: bubnovai@mail.ru 10.3928/1081597X-20091030-01 To propose a new approach for the study of corneal biomechanics using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) database, which is based on changes in velocity retardation in the central cornea at the peak of flattening. The ORA applanation curve was analyzed using a mathematical technique, which allowed calculation of the elasticity coefficient (Ke), which is primarily characteristic of the elastic properties of the cornea. Elasticity coefficient values were obtained in patients with presumably different biomechanical properties of the cornea: “normal” cornea (71 eyes, normal group), keratoconus (34 eyes, keratoconus group), LASIK (36 eyes, LASIK group), and glaucoma with elevated and compensated intraocular pressure (IOP) (38 eyes, glaucoma group). The mean Ke value in the normal group was 11.05±1.6, and the corneal thickness correlation coefficient r2 was 0.48. In the keratoconus group, the mean Ke value was 4.91±1.87 and the corneal thickness correlation coefficient r2 was 0.47. In the LASIK group, Ke and r2 were 5.99±1.18 and 0.39, respectively. In the glaucoma group, the same eyes that experienced a two-fold reduction in IOP developed a statistically significant reduction in the Ke (1.06 times lower), whereas their corneal hysteresis value increased 1.25 times. The elasticity coefficient calculated using the ORA applanation curve can be used in the evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties. From the Research Institute of Eye Diseases of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, “Elaboration of methods of mathematical simulation, of experimental and clinical research of biomechanical (strength) properties of cornea” (07-04-01710-a). The authors have no financial interest in the materials presented herein. Correspondence: Irina A. Bubnova, MD, 11-a Rossolimo St, Moscow, Russia, 119021. Tel: 79166209921; Fax: 74992480125; E-mail: bubnovai@mail.ru

1 January 2018 in Russian Annals of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBO. I. Baum
O. I. Baum
AOA. I. Omelchenko
A. I. Omelchenko
EKE. M. Kasyanenko
E. M. Kasyanenko
RSR. V. Skidanov
R. V. Skidanov
NKN. L. Kazanskij
N. L. Kazanskij
ESE. N. Sobol
E. N. Sobol
Medical article медицинская статья

1 January 2022 in Russian Annals of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCM. Chedly
M. Chedly
AAA.E. Aslamazova
A.E. Aslamazova
IBI.V. Blinova
I.V. Blinova
AGA.V. Golovchenko
A.V. Golovchenko
VSVladimir Siplivy
Vladimir Siplivy
Most foreign authors currently recommend the protocol and charts developed for the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) as the gold standard for evaluation of visual acuity (VA) in clinical trials and studies. Not every medical facility has equipment required for performing visometry by that method, while Sivtsev tables are found universally. To compare ETDRS and the more common Sivtsev visometry methods. The study included 100 volunteers - students of the Sechenov University. All participants were examined for VA in both eyes without correction using ETDRS "R" chart and Sivtsev table. Visometry with "R" ETDRS chart involved calculation of the number of named letters, then the number was translated into logarithmic notation by the conventional method. Sivtsev visometry findings were translated into logarithmic notation by two methods: first - standard, line-by-line, second - experimental, letter-by-letter. Subjects were divided into two groups: high VA (higher than 0.4 in decimal scale) and low VA - everyone else. The best agreement with ETDRS was found in letter-by-letter method of Sivtsev table interpretation, especially in the group with high VA with the lowest 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of ±0.157 logMAR, or 8 letters on ETDRS. Clinically significant were also LoA in comparison of ETDRS with line-by-line calculation method in the group with high VA and in letter-by-letter method without dividing groups by VA. The use of Sivtsev table in standardized multicenter studies is only reasonable when the ETDRS charts are unavailable.

1 August 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
OBOlga Baum
Olga Baum
AYAleksey Yuzhakov
Aleksey Yuzhakov
AOAlexander Omelchenko
Alexander Omelchenko
ABAndrey Bolshunov
Andrey Bolshunov
VSVladimir Siplivy
Vladimir Siplivy
ESEmil Sobol
Emil Sobol