End of life packaging is nowadays one of the major environmental problems due to its short usage time, the low biodegradability, and the big volume occupied. In this context, gasification is one of the most promising chemical recycling techniques. Some non-recyclable or non-compostable waste gasification plants are already operating such as Enerkem Alberta Biofuels in Canada or the Sierra’s FastOx Pathfinder in California. In this review, we have examined works about plastic gasification from the last fifteen years with a specific focus on polyolefin (PP, PE), plastics mix, and co-gasification of plastic with biomass. For each of these, the best operating conditions were investigated. A very in-depth section was dedicated to supercritical water gasification (SCWG). The most used reactors in gasification processes are fluidized bed reactors together with air or steam as gasifying agents. Tar removal is commonly performed using olivine, dolomite, or nickel based catalysts. SCWG has numerous advantages including the inhibition of tar and coke formation and can be used to remove microplastics from the marine environment. In co-gasification of plastic material with coal or biomass, synergistic effects are observed between the raw materials, which improve the performance of the process, allowing to obtain higher gas yields and a syngas with a high energy content.

Microwave-assisted pyrolysis is a promising thermochemical technique to convert waste polymers and biomass into raw chemicals and fuels. However, this process involves several issues related to the interactions between materials and microwaves. Consequently, the control of temperature during microwave-assisted pyrolysis is a hard task both for measurement and uniformity during the overall pyrolytic run. In this review, we introduce some of the main theoretical aspects of the microwaves–materials interactions alongside the issues related to microwave pyrolytic processability of materials.

Biochar properties are highly dependent on the feedstock type and operational conditions during thermochemical processing, in particular slow pyrolysis. To clarify this aspect, nine biochars were produced by pyrolyzing in a macro TGA at 400, 550, and 650 °C three different decorticated and chopped biomasses. The studied biomasses are representative of conifer (black pine) and deciduous (poplar and willow) woods. Biochar surface area, size, and shape of pores were investigated by means of nitrogen adsorption isotherm, Hg porosimetry, and electron microscopy. The results indicate that biochars with high surface area can be obtained at high temperature, especially starting from pine feedstock. Regarding porosity, micro-pores (1–10 nm) are not remarkably affected by the starting feedstocks, while macro-pores (> 10 nm) are strictly connected with the morphology of the starting wood. More than the surface area, we found a strong correlation between the chemical composition (elemental composition and FTIR) of the biochars and their retention and release capacity of ions (cation exchange capacity, CEC). The trend in the CEC, determined via coupled approach by spectrophotometric and ion chromatography, reveals that the increase in the processing temperature has the effect of reducing the number of functional groups able of exchanging the cations with the equilibrium solution. This work represents a step forward in the characterization of the char produced by pyrolysis of biomass thanks to the development of a multi-technique approach allowing to obtain a structure-property correlation of the biochars. Our results and experimental approach can help in the optimization of the parameters used in the preparation of these materials. Graphical abstract