Megan Farrelly

Prof. Megan Farrelly

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChristopher Luederitz
Christopher Luederitz
NSNiko Schäpke
Niko Schäpke
AWArnim Wiek
Arnim Wiek
DLDaniel J. Lang
Daniel J. Lang
MBMatthias Bergmann
Matthias Bergmann
FWFrances R. Westley
Frances R. Westley

1 March 2009 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRebekah Brown
Rebekah Brown
MFMegan Farrelly
Megan Farrelly
Sustainable urban water management (SUWM) requires an integrated, adaptive, coordinated and participatory approach. Current urban water policies are beginning to reflect this understanding yet the rhetoric is often not translated to implementation. Despite the ‘new’ philosophy, urban water management remains a complex and fragmented area relying on traditional, technical, linear management approaches. Despite widespread acknowledgement of the barriers to change, there has been little systematic review of what constitutes the scope of such barriers and how these should be addressed to advance SUWM. To better understand why implementation fails to occur beyond ad hoc project interventions, an extensive literature review of observed and studied barriers was conducted. Drawing on local, national and international literature from the field of integrated urban water management and other similar fields, 53 studies were assessed, resulting in a typology of 12 barrier types. The analysis revealed the barriers are largely socio-institutional rather than technical, reflecting issues related to community, resources, responsibility, knowledge, vision, commitment and coordination. Furthermore, the meta-analysis demonstrated a paucity of targeted strategies for overcoming the stated institutional barriers. Evaluation of the typology in relation to capacity building suggests that these systemic issues require a sophisticated programme of change that focuses on fostering social capital, inter-sectoral professional development, and inter-organisational coordination.

1 May 2011 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMegan Farrelly
Megan Farrelly
RBRebekah Brown
Rebekah Brown

1 August 2013 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRebekah Brown
Rebekah Brown
MFMegan Farrelly
Megan Farrelly
DLDerk Loorbach
Derk Loorbach

1 October 2012 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJeroen Rijke
Jeroen Rijke
RBRebekah Brown
Rebekah Brown
CZChris Zevenbergen
Chris Zevenbergen
RARichard Ashley
Richard Ashley
MFMegan Farrelly
Megan Farrelly
SHSebastiaan van Herk
Sebastiaan van Herk

1 April 2013 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJ.J. Bos
J.J. Bos
RBRebekah Brown
Rebekah Brown
MFMegan Farrelly
Megan Farrelly