Arthur G. Appel

Dr. Arthur G. Appel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2021 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAmeya D Gondhalekar
Ameya D Gondhalekar
Arthur G. AppelArthur G. Appel
Arthur G. Appel
GTGretchen M. Thomas
Gretchen M. Thomas
Alvaro RomeroAlvaro Romero
Alvaro Romero
Effective control of domestic and peridomestic cockroaches requires integrated approaches that emphasize concurrent use of chemicals with alternative control tactics. An integrated pest management (IPM) approach is particularly justified in environments where satisfactory cockroach control cannot be achieved due to multiple factors including development of insecticide aversion and resistance in some cockroach species, and poor sanitation or structural issues that foster infestations. While a flurry of research effort has been devoted to study alternative tactics for cockroach control, only a few of them have been evaluated in the context of IPM programs. This review focuses on examining studies on alternative tactics that are proven efficacious, economical, and logistically feasible for their inclusion in IPM programs for important domestic and peridomestic cockroaches in the USA. Management programs that educate the public on cockroach biology, behavior, and the importance of sanitation; use of traps to monitor infestation levels; apply targeted low impact insecticides such as baits, have demonstrated a greater success for effective and sustainable control of cockroaches when compared to an insecticide-only approach. Incorporation of other alternative control methods to IPM programs will require more applied research that validates their use in real-world scenarios and demonstrates their cost-effectiveness.

8 March 2017 in Journal of Economic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XWXiaoyan Wu
Xiaoyan Wu
Arthur G. AppelArthur G. Appel
Arthur G. Appel
German cockroaches, Blattella germanica (L.), remain one of the most difficult indoor insect species to control because of its ability to develop resistance to insecticides. The toxicity and resistance levels of five technical-grade insecticides (permethrin, chlorpyrifos, propoxur, imidacloprid, and fipronil) were determined for adult males of seven strains of the German cockroach, a laboratory-reared susceptible strain (S) and six field-collected strains (B, D, E, G, H, and I). Using topical application methods, fipronil was the most toxic insecticide to all seven strains. The LD50 values of fipronil in the susceptible strain (S) and the field-collected strains B, D, E, G, H, and I were 1.33, 2.62, 11.53, 5.07, 7.66, 5.15, and 10.15 ng/insect, respectively. The field-collected strains were most resistant to permethrin among the five insecticides, except for strain H. The resistance ratios of strains B, D, E, G, and I to permethrin were 31.8, 37.3, 51.9, 34.9, and 37.5, respectively. With a resistance ratio of 6.4, the field-collected strain H was most resistant to chlorpyrifos. The field-collected strains were not significantly resistant to propoxur. Strains B, H, and I were not significantly resistant to imidacloprid when compared with the susceptible strain. Based on the different resistance ratios for each insecticide, we conclude that there are high rates of insecticide resistance in German cockroaches from Franklin County, NC, and that the field-collected strains most likely had different treatment histories.

1 January 2006 in Journal of Insect Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSThomas G. Shelton
Thomas G. Shelton
XHX. Ping Hu
X. Ping Hu
Arthur G. AppelArthur G. Appel
Arthur G. Appel
TWTerence L. Wagner
Terence L. Wagner

11 May 2014 in Journal of Chemical Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FLFeng Liu
Feng Liu
KHKenneth F. Haynes
Kenneth F. Haynes
Arthur G. AppelArthur G. Appel
Arthur G. Appel
NLNannan Liu
Nannan Liu

1 December 2016 in Florida Entomologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BDBeatrice Dingha
Beatrice Dingha
JOJeremy O'NEal
Jeremy O'NEal
Arthur G. AppelArthur G. Appel
Arthur G. Appel
Louis JackaiLouis Jackai
Louis Jackai
The German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), is a serious pest in residential housing with control administered mainly through application of pesticides. Integrated pest management (IPM) involves a combination of strategies aimed at reducing pest populations. Over a 27 mo study period, we determined levels of German cockroach populations in rural manufactured residential homes: before IPM implementation (Pre-IPM), the period when residents were educated on IPM strategies (IPM-education), and during education and insecticide application (IPM-education plus bait). Sanitation level in the IPM-education phase (2.8) was significantly different from that in the Pre-IPM phase (3.9) and was accompanied by a decrease in trap catch. Sticky and jar traps were deployed in kitchen areas to assess levels of infestation. Trap catch from all participants during the 3 phases was significantly different. Mean cockroach catch per participant per trap was 20.5 ± 4.1 during Pre-IPM, 13.2 ... Resumen La cucaracha alemana, Blatella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), es una plaga seria en viviendas residenciales bajo un control administrado principalmente basado en la aplicación de plaguicidas. El manejo integrado de plagas (MIP) implica una combinación de estrategias dirigidas a reducir las poblaciones de plagas. Durante un período de estudio de 27 meses, se determinaron los niveles de las poblaciones de cucarachas alemanas en los hogares residenciales fabricados en áreas rurales: antes de la implementación del MIP (Pre-MIP), el período en que los residentes fueron educados en las estrategias de manejo integrado de plagas (MIP-educación), y durante la educación y la aplicación de insecticida (MIP-educación y cebo). El nivel de sanitación en la fase de MIP-educación (2,8) fue significativamente diferente de la de la fase de pre-MIP (3.9) y fue acompañado por una disminución de la captura trampa. Trampas pegajosas y de envases fueron puestas en las áreas de la cocina para evaluar el nivel ...

5 July 2020 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OAOlufemi Ajayi
Olufemi Ajayi
Arthur G. AppelArthur G. Appel
Arthur G. Appel
LCLi Chen
Li Chen
HFHenry Y. Fadamiro
Henry Y. Fadamiro
The high surface area to volume ratio of terrestrial insects makes them highly susceptible to desiccation mainly through the cuticle. Cuticular permeability (CP) is usually the most important factor limiting water loss in terrestrial insects. Water loss rate, percentage of total body water (%TBW) content, CP, and desiccation tolerance were investigated in workers of four Solenopsis species in the southeastern USA. We hypothesized that tropical/subtropical ants (S. invicta and S. geminata) will have lower CP values and tolerate higher levels of desiccation than temperate ants (S. richteri and S. invicta × S. richteri). The %TBW content was similar among species. Solenopsis invicta had a 1.3-fold and 1.1-fold lower CP value than S. invicta × S. richteri and S. richteri, respectively. Solenopsis geminata had a 1.3-fold lower CP value than S. invicta × S. richteri, and a 1.2-fold lower CP value than S. richteri. The LT50 values (lethal time to kill 50% of the population) ranged from 1.5 h (small S. geminata) to 8.5 h (large S. invicta). Desiccation tolerance ranged between 36 and 50 %TBW lost at death and was not related to a species’ location of origin. This study is the first report of water relations of S. invicta × S. richteri. It demonstrates that desiccation stress differentially can affect the survival of different Solenopsis species and implies that environmental stress can affect the distribution of these species in the southeastern USA.
1