David Stanford

Dr. David Stanford


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 December 2013 in Queueing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDavid Stanford
David Stanford
PTPeter Taylor
Peter Taylor
IZIlze Ziedins
Ilze Ziedins
We are interested in queues in which customers of different classes arrive to a service facility, and where performance targets are specified for each class. The manager of such a queue has the task of implementing a queueing discipline that results in the performance targets for all classes being met simultaneously. For the case where the performance targets are specified in terms of ratios of mean waiting times, as long ago as the 1960s, Kleinrock suggested a queueing discipline to ensure that the targets are achieved. He proposed that customers accumulate priority as a linear function of their time in the queue: the higher the urgency of the customer’s class, the greater the rate at which that customer accumulates priority. When the server becomes free, the customer (if any) with the highest accumulated priority at that time point is the one that is selected for service. Kleinrock called such a queue a time-dependent priority queue, but we shall refer to it as the accumulating priority queue. Recognising that the performance of many queues, particularly in the healthcare and human services sectors, is specified in terms of tails of waiting time distributions for customers of different classes, we revisit the accumulating priority queue to derive its waiting time distributions, rather than just the mean waiting times. We believe that some elements of our analysis, particularly the process that we call the maximum priority process, are of mathematical interest in their own right.

1 May 2005 in ASTIN Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDavid Stanford
David Stanford
FAFlorin Avram
Florin Avram
ABA.L. Badescu
A.L. Badescu
LBL. Breuer
L. Breuer
ASA. Da Silva Soares
A. Da Silva Soares
GLG. Latouche
G. Latouche
The present paper extends the “Erlangization” idea introduced by Asmussen, Avram, and Usabel (2002) to the Sparre-Andersen and stationary renewal risk models. Erlangization yields an asymptotically-exact method for calculating finite time ruin probabilities with phase-type claim amounts. The method is based on finding the probability of ruin prior to a phase-type random horizon, independent of the risk process. When the horizon follows an Erlang-l distribution, the method provides a sequence of approximations that converges to the true finite-time ruin probability as l increases. Furthermore, the random horizon is easier to work with, so that very accurate probabilities of ruin are obtained with comparatively little computational effort. An additional section determines the phase-type form of the deficit at ruin in both models. Our work exploits the relationship to fluid queues to provide effective computational algorithms for the determination of these quantities, as demonstrated by the numerical examples.

1 November 2005 in Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndrei L. Badescu
Andrei L. Badescu
LBLothar Breuer
Lothar Breuer
SDSteve Drekic
Steve Drekic
GLGuy Latouche
Guy Latouche
DSDavid Stanford
David Stanford
This paper presents an explicit characterization for the joint probability density function of the surplus immediately prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin for a general risk process, which includes the Sparre-Andersen risk model with phase-type inter-claim times and claim sizes. The model can also accommodate a Markovian arrival process which enables claim sizes to be correlated with the inter-claim times. The marginal density function of the surplus immediately prior to ruin is specifically considered. Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the application of this result.

1 December 2017 in Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNa Li
Na Li
DSDavid Stanford
David Stanford
PTPeter Taylor
Peter Taylor
IZIlze Ziedins
Ilze Ziedins
In 1964, Kleinrock proposed a queueing discipline for a single-server queue in which customers from different classes accumulate priority as linear functions of their waiting time. At the instant that a server becomes free, it selects the waiting customer with the highest accumulated priority, provided that the queue is nonempty. He developed a recursion for calculating the expected waiting time for each class. In 2014, Stanford, Taylor, and Ziedins reconsidered this queue, which they termed the accumulating priority queue (APQ), and derived the waiting time distribution for each class. Kleinrock and Finkelstein in 1967 also studied an accumulating priority system in which customers’ priorities increase as a power-law function of their waiting time. They established that it is possible to associate a particular linear APQ with such a power-law APQ, so that the expected waiting times of customers from all classes are preserved. In this paper, we extend their analysis to characterise the class of nonlinear APQs for which an equivalent linear APQ can be found, in the sense that, for identical sample paths of the arrival and service processes, the ordering of all customers is identical at all times in both the linear and nonlinear systems.

1 February 2001 in Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Steve DrekicSteve Drekic
Steve Drekic
DSDavid Stanford
David Stanford

19 August 2014 in Queueing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Steve DrekicSteve Drekic
Steve Drekic
DSDavid Stanford
David Stanford
DWDouglas G. Woolford
Douglas G. Woolford
VMVivian C. McAlister
Vivian C. McAlister