Ana Adeva-Bustos

Mr. Ana Adeva-Bustos


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 March 2021 in River Research and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJan Heggenes
Jan Heggenes
MSMorten Stickler
Morten Stickler
KAKnut Alfredsen
Knut Alfredsen
JBJohn E. Brittain
John E. Brittain
AAAna Adeva-Bustos
Ana Adeva-Bustos
AHAri Huusko
Ari Huusko
Water temperatures control life histories and diversity of aquatic species. Hydropower regulation, particularly in high head systems, alters natural water temperature regimes, which may have profound and long‐term impacts on aquatic environments. Temperatures in by‐pass sections and reaches affected by residual/environmental minimum flows fluctuate more than in natural flow regimes, driven more by influence of air temperatures. Reaches downstream of power plant outlets tend to become warmer in winter and colder in summer, driven by stratification behind the reservoir dam. In hydro‐peaked systems high‐low temperature effects may thus be aggravated. We review alterations of hydropower to natural thermal regimes, impacts on key organisms in terms of survival, development and behavioral thresholds, and potential mitigation measures, with focus on Atlantic salmon and brown trout in high northern latitude stream systems. Previous syntheses have focused mainly on flow changes and ecological impacts. Temperature effects may not always be correlated with flow changes, although there are some unique challenges with temperature changes in far northern latitudes, for example, related to the seasonal and colder climates. To help knowledge‐based management and identify potential knowledge gaps, we review how hydropower regulation may impact seasonal water temperatures, what impacts changes to stream system temperature regimes may have to key organisms, for example, Atlantic salmon and brown trout, and what adaptations and behavioral variations they may exhibit to respond to changed temperature regimes, and finally what good practices can be recommended for mitigating temperature impacts. This synthesis indicates that there are impacts to the fish and their supporting food webs, in particular related to growth and development, and the potential for negative impacts seems higher, and better studied, than positive impacts in northern river systems. Some of these impacts may be modified by directed hydropower regulation practices, but here effect studies and knowledge are limited.

18 October 2017 in Environmental Biology of Fishes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJan Heggenes
Jan Heggenes
KAKnut Alfredsen
Knut Alfredsen
AAAna Adeva-Bustos
Ana Adeva-Bustos
AHAri Huusko
Ari Huusko
MSMorten Stickler
Morten Stickler

1 February 2020 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDavid N. Barton
David N. Barton
HSHåkon Sundt
Håkon Sundt
AAAna Adeva-Bustos
Ana Adeva-Bustos
HFHans-Petter Fjeldstad
Hans-Petter Fjeldstad
RHRichard Hedger
Richard Hedger
AMAnders L. Madsen
Anders L. Madsen

19 February 2016 in Water Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tor H. BakkenTor H. Bakken
Tor H. Bakken
IMIngunn Saur Modahl
Ingunn Saur Modahl
HRHanne Lerche Raadal
Hanne Lerche Raadal
AAAna Adeva-Bustos
Ana Adeva-Bustos
SASilje Arnøy
Silje Arnøy
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources represented a benchmark in the assessment of water consumption from electricity production. The numbers for hydropower ranged from very low to much larger than the other renewable technologies, partly explained by methodological problems. One of the methodological shortcomings identified was the lack of guidance on how to allocate the water consumption rates in multipurpose reservoirs. This paper is, according to the authors’ knowledge, the first attempt to evaluate, test and propose a methodology for the allocation of water consumption from such reservoirs. We tested four different allocation methods in four different cases, all serving three to five functions, including drinking water supply, irrigation, flood control, industrial water, ecological flow and power generation. Based on our case studies we consider volume allocation to be the most robust approach for allocating water consumption between functions in multipurpose reservoirs. The spatial boundaries of the analysis should follow the boundaries of the hydraulic system. We recommend that data should preferably be gathered from one source for all functions, to ensure a consistent calculation approach. We believe the findings are relevant for similar allocation problems, such as allocation of energy investments and green-house gas emissions from multipurpose reservoirs.

24 January 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAna Juarez
Ana Juarez
AAAna Adeva-Bustos
Ana Adeva-Bustos
KAKnut Alfredsen
Knut Alfredsen
BDBjørn Otto Dønnum
Bjørn Otto Dønnum
Extreme, short-duration fluctuations caused by hydropeaking occurs when hydropower is regulated to cover demand peaks in the electricity market. Such rapid dewatering processes may have a high impact on the downstream biological conditions, particularly related to stranding of fish and other species. The present work analyzes these fluctuations using a two-dimensional unsteady hydraulic modelling approach for quantification of two important hydro-morphological factors on fish stranding risk: the variation in wetted area and the dewatering ramping rate. This approach was applied on the two-kilometer-long reach of Storåne downstream of the Hol 1 power plant, where topo bathymetric LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data was available providing a high-resolution digital elevation model. Based on this model, hydraulic conditions could be simulated in high detail allowing for an accurate assessment of the hydro morphological factors. Results show the dried area distribution at different flows and dewatering ramping rates. The attenuation of the water level fluctuation due to the damping effect along the river reach controls the dewatering rate. We recommend an alternative scenario operation which can reduce the impact of the peaking operation and estimate the operational mitigation cost. We find that the modelling based on the fine resolution grid provides new opportunities in assessing effects of hydropower regulations on the ecosystem.

1 January 2017 in Water Resources and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAna Adeva-Bustos
Ana Adeva-Bustos
RHRichard D. Hedger
Richard D. Hedger
HFHans-Petter Fjeldstad
Hans-Petter Fjeldstad
KAKnut Alfredsen
Knut Alfredsen
HSHåkon Sundt
Håkon Sundt
DBDavid Nicholas Barton
David Nicholas Barton