Inga Monika Koszalka

Dr. Inga Monika Koszalka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Ocean Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ESErik van Sebille
Erik van Sebille
SGStephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies
RARyan Abernathey
Ryan Abernathey
TAThomas P. Adams
Thomas P. Adams
PBPavel Berloff
Pavel Berloff
JZJan D. Zika
Jan D. Zika
Lagrangian analysis is a powerful way to analyse the output of ocean circulation models and other ocean velocity data such as from altimetry. In the Lagrangian approach, large sets of virtual particles are integrated within the three-dimensional, time-evolving velocity fields. Over several decades, a variety of tools and methods for this purpose have emerged. Here, we review the state of the art in the field of Lagrangian analysis of ocean velocity data, starting from a fundamental kinematic framework and with a focus on large-scale open ocean applications. Beyond the use of explicit velocity fields, we consider the influence of unresolved physics and dynamics on particle trajectories. We comprehensively list and discuss the tools currently available for tracking virtual particles. We then showcase some of the innovative applications of trajectory data, and conclude with some open questions and an outlook. The overall goal of this review paper is to reconcile some of the different techniques and methods in Lagrangian ocean analysis, while recognising the rich diversity of codes that have and continue to emerge, and the challenges of the coming age of petascale computing

6 October 2020 in Reviews of Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBruno Merz
Bruno Merz
CKChristian Kuhlicke
Christian Kuhlicke
MKMichael Kunz
Michael Kunz
MPMassimiliano Pittore
Massimiliano Pittore
ABAndrey Babeyko
Andrey Babeyko
AWAndreas Wurpts
Andreas Wurpts
Forecasting and early warning systems are important investments to protect lives, properties, and livelihood. While early warning systems are frequently used to predict the magnitude, location, and timing of potentially damaging events, these systems rarely provide impact estimates, such as the expected amount and distribution of physical damage, human consequences, disruption of services, or financial loss. Complementing early warning systems with impact forecasts has a twofold advantage: It would provide decision makers with richer information to take informed decisions about emergency measures and focus the attention of different disciplines on a common target. This would allow capitalizing on synergies between different disciplines and boosting the development of multihazard early warning systems. This review discusses the state of the art in impact forecasting for a wide range of natural hazards. We outline the added value of impact‐based warnings compared to hazard forecasting for the emergency phase, indicate challenges and pitfalls, and synthesize the review results across hazard types most relevant for Europe.

30 August 2019 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLuca Centurioni
Luca Centurioni
JTJon Turton
Jon Turton
RLRick Lumpkin
Rick Lumpkin
LBLancelot Braasch
Lancelot Braasch
GBGary Brassington
Gary Brassington
DZDongxiao Zhang
Dongxiao Zhang
The air–sea interface is a key gateway in the Earth system. It is where the atmosphere sets the ocean in motion, climate/weather-relevant air–sea processes occur, and pollutants (i.e., plastic, anthropogenic carbon dioxide, radioactive/chemical waste) enter the sea. Hence, accurate estimates and forecasts of physical and biogeochemical processes at this interface are critical for sustainable blue economy planning, growth, and disaster mitigation. Such estimates and forecasts rely on accurate and integrated in situ and satellite surface observations. High-impact uses of ocean surface observations of essential ocean/climate variables (EOVs/ECVs) include (1) assimilation into/validation of weather, ocean, and climate forecast models to improve their skill, impact, and value; (2) ocean physics studies (i.e., heat, momentum, freshwater, and biogeochemical air–sea fluxes) to further our understanding and parameterization of air–sea processes; and (3) calibration and validation of satellite ocean products (i.e., currents, temperature, salinity, sea level, ocean color, wind, and waves). We review strengths and limitations, impacts, and sustainability of in situ ocean surface observations of several ECVs and EOVs. We draw a 10-year vision of the global ocean surface observing network for improved synergy and integration with other observing systems (e.g., satellites), for modeling/forecast efforts, and for a better ocean observing governance. The context is both the applications listed above and the guidelines of frameworks such as the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) and Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) (both co-sponsored by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, IOC–UNESCO; the World Meteorological Organization, WMO; the United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP; and the International Science Council, ISC). Networks of multiparametric platforms, such as the global drifter array, offer opportunities for new and improved in situ observations. Advances in sensor technology (e.g., low-cost wave sensors), high-throughput communications, evolving cyberinfrastructures, and data information systems with potential to improve the scope, efficiency, integration, and sustainability of the ocean surface observing system are explored.

1 April 2011 in Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Inga Monika KoszalkaInga Monika Koszalka
Inga Monika Koszalka
JLJoseph Lacasce
Joseph Lacasce
MAM. Andersson
M. Andersson
KOK.A. Orvik
K.A. Orvik
CMC. Mauritzen
C. Mauritzen

1 July 2009 in Journal of Marine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Inga Monika KoszalkaInga Monika Koszalka
Inga Monika Koszalka
JLJoseph Lacasce
Joseph Lacasce
KOK. A. Orvik
K. A. Orvik

1 July 2011 in Progress in Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMC. Mauritzen
C. Mauritzen
EHE. Hansen
E. Hansen
MAM. Andersson
M. Andersson
BBB. Berx
B. Berx
ABA. Beszczynska-Möller
A. Beszczynska-Möller
CRC. Wexels Riser
C. Wexels Riser