Ertug  Ercin

Dr. Ertug Ercin

R2Water Research and Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2012 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alessandro GalliAlessandro Galli
Alessandro Galli
Thomas WiedmannThomas Wiedmann
Thomas Wiedmann
Ertug  ErcinErtug Ercin
Ertug Ercin
DKDoris Knoblauch
Doris Knoblauch
BEBrad Ewing
Brad Ewing
SGStefan Giljum
Stefan Giljum

1 March 2014 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ertug  ErcinErtug Ercin
Ertug Ercin
Arjen HoekstraArjen Hoekstra
Arjen Hoekstra
This study develops water footprint scenarios for 2050 based on a number of drivers of change: population growth, economic growth, production/trade pattern, consumption pattern (dietary change, bioenergy use) and technological development. The objective the study is to understand the changes in the water footprint (WF) of production and consumption for possible futures by region and to elaborate the main drivers of this change. In addition, we assess virtual water flows between the regions of the world to show dependencies of regions on water resources in other regions under different possible futures. We constructed four scenarios, along two axes, representing two key dimensions of uncertainty: globalization versus regional selfsufficiency, and economy-driven development versus development driven by social and environmental objectives. The study shows how different drivers will change the level of water consumption and pollution globally in 2050. The presented scenarios can form a basis for a further assessment of how humanity can mitigate future freshwater scarcity. We showed with this study that reducing humanity's water footprint to sustainable levels is possible even with increasing populations, provided that consumption patterns change. This study can help to guide corrective policies at both national and international levels, and to set priorities for the years ahead in order to achieve sustainable and equitable use of the world's fresh water resources.

26 September 2012 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKjartan Steen-Olsen
Kjartan Steen-Olsen
JWJan Weinzettel
Jan Weinzettel
GCGemma Cranston
Gemma Cranston
Ertug  ErcinErtug Ercin
Ertug Ercin
EHEdgar G. Hertwich
Edgar G. Hertwich

1 December 2012 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEBrad R. Ewing
Brad R. Ewing
THTroy R. Hawkins
Troy R. Hawkins
Thomas WiedmannThomas Wiedmann
Thomas Wiedmann
Alessandro GalliAlessandro Galli
Alessandro Galli
Ertug  ErcinErtug Ercin
Ertug Ercin
KSKjartan Steen-Olsen
Kjartan Steen-Olsen

1 September 2012 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DJDonna Jefferies
Donna Jefferies
IMIvan Muñoz
Ivan Muñoz
JHJuliet Hodges
Juliet Hodges
VKVanessa J. King
Vanessa J. King
Maite M. AldayaMaite M. Aldaya
Maite M. Aldaya
Arjen HoekstraArjen Hoekstra
Arjen Hoekstra

23 October 2010 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ertug  ErcinErtug Ercin
Ertug Ercin
Maite M. AldayaMaite M. Aldaya
Maite M. Aldaya
Arjen HoekstraArjen Hoekstra
Arjen Hoekstra
All water use in the world is ultimately linked to final consumption by consumers. It is therefore interesting to know the specific water requirements of various consumer goods, particularly the water-intensive ones. This information is relevant not only for consumers, but also for food processors, retailers, and traders. The objective of this paper is to carry out a pilot study on water footprint accounting and impact assessment for a hypothetical sugar-containing carbonated beverage in a 0.5 l PET-bottle produced in a hypothetical factory that takes its sugar alternatively from sugar beet, sugar cane and high fructose maize syrup and from different countries. The composition of the beverage and the characteristics of the factory are hypothetical but realistic. The data assumed have been inspired by a real case. This paper does not only look at the water footprint of the ingredients of the beverage, but also at the water footprint of the bottle, other packaging materials and construction materials, paper and energy used in the factory. Although most companies focus on their own operational performance, this paper shows that it is important to consider freshwater usage along the supply chain. The water footprint of the beverage studied has a water footprint of 150 to 300 l of water per 0.5 l bottle, of which 99.7–99.8% refers to the supply chain. The study also shows that agricultural ingredients that constitute only a small fraction in weight of the final product have the biggest share at the total water footprint of a product.