Pietro Ursi

Prof. Dr. Pietro Ursi

Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialities “Paride Stefanini”, Sapienza University of Rome, viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

30 June 2019 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FVFederica Vurchio
Federica Vurchio
Pietro UrsiPietro Ursi
Pietro Ursi
Alessio BuzzinAlessio Buzzin
Alessio Buzzin
AVAndrea Veroli
Andrea Veroli
Andrea ScorzaAndrea Scorza
Andrea Scorza
Nicola Pio BelfioreNicola Pio Belfiore
Nicola Pio Belfiore
The micromanipulation of micro objects is nowadays the focus of several investigations, specially in biomedical applications. Therefore, some manipulation tasks are required to be in aqueous environment and become more challenging because they depend upon observation and actuation methods that are compatible with MEMS Technology based micromanipulators. This paper describes how three grasping-releasing based tasks have been successfully applied to agarose micro beads whose average size is about 60 μ m: (i) the extraction of a single micro bead from a water drop; (ii) the insertion of a single micro bead into the drop; (iii) the grasping of a single micro bead inside the drop. The success of the performed tasks rely on the use of a microgripper previously designed, fabricated, and tested.

25 May 2013 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEmanuele Lezoche
Emanuele Lezoche
BFBernardina Fabiani
Bernardina Fabiani
GDGiancarlo D’ambrosio
Giancarlo D’ambrosio
Pietro UrsiPietro Ursi
Pietro Ursi
Andrea BallaAndrea Balla
Andrea Balla
APAlessandro M. Paganini
Alessandro M. Paganini

16 February 2016 in Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SQSilvia Quaresima
Silvia Quaresima
Andrea BallaAndrea Balla
Andrea Balla
GDGiancarlo D’ambrosio
Giancarlo D’ambrosio
PBpaolo bruzzone
paolo bruzzone
Pietro UrsiPietro Ursi
Pietro Ursi
APAlessandro M. Paganini
Alessandro M. Paganini
Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) after R1 endoscopic resection or local recurrence of early rectal cancer after operative endoscopy. Material and methods Twenty patients with early rectal cancer were enrolled, including patients with incomplete endoscopic resection, or complete endoscopic resection of a tumor with unfavorable prognostic factors (group A, ten patients), and local recurrence after endoscopic removal (group B, ten patients). At admission, histology after endoscopic polypectomy was: TisR1(4), T1R0G3(1), T1R1(5) in group A, and TisR0(8), T1R0(2) in group B. All patients underwent ELRR by TEM with nucleotide-guided mesorectal excision (NGME). Results Mean operative time was 150 minutes. Complications occurred in two patients (10%). Definitive histology was: moderate dysplasia(4), pT0N0(3), pTisN0(5), pT1N0(6), pT2N0(2). Mean number of lymph-nodes was 3.1. Mean follow-up was 79.5 months. All patients are alive and disease-free. Conclusions ELRR by TEM after R1 endoscopic resection of early rectal cancer or for local recurrence after operative endoscopy is safe and effective. It may be considered as a diagnostic procedure, as well as a curative treatment option, instead of a more invasive TME.

7 August 2013
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDaniele Scoglio
Daniele Scoglio
Andrea BallaAndrea Balla
Andrea Balla
MPMarcello Paci
Marcello Paci
MGMario Guerrieri
Mario Guerrieri
GLGiovanni Lezoche
Giovanni Lezoche
APAlessandro M Paganini
Alessandro M Paganini

11 July 2022 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pietro UrsiPietro Ursi
Pietro Ursi
ARAndrea Rossi
Andrea Rossi
FBFabio Botta
Fabio Botta
Nicola Pio BelfioreNicola Pio Belfiore
Nicola Pio Belfiore
This work offers a new alternative tool for atherectomy operations, with the purpose of minimizing the risks for the patients and maximizing the number of clinical cases for which the system can be used, thanks to the possibility of scaling its size down to lumen reduced to a few tenths of mm. The development of this microsystem has presented a certain theoretical work during the kinematic synthesis and the design stages. In the first stage a new multi-loop mechanism with a Stephenson’s kinematic chain (KC) was found and then adopted as the so-called pseudo-rigid body mechanism (PRBM). Analytical modeling was necessary to verify the synthesis requirements. In the second stage, the joint replacement method was applied to the PRBM to obtain a corresponding and equivalent compliant mechanism with lumped compliance. The latter presents two loops and six elastic joints and so the evaluation of the microsystem mechanical advantage (MA) had to be calculated by taking into account the accumulation of elastic energy in the elastic joints. Hence, a new closed form expression of the microsystem MA was found with a method that presents some new aspects in the approach. The results obtained with Finite Element Analysis (FEA) were compared to those obtained with the analytical model. Finally, it is worth noting that a microsystem prototype can be fabricated by using MEMS Technology classical methods, while the microsystem packaging could be a further development for the present investigation.