Cedryck Vaquette

Dr. Cedryck Vaquette


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2011 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVCedryck Vaquette
Cedryck Vaquette
JCJustin Cooper-White
Justin Cooper-White

22 October 2012 in Biomaterials Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPaul D. Dalton
Paul D. Dalton
CVCedryck Vaquette
Cedryck Vaquette
Brooke FarrugiaBrooke Farrugia
Brooke Farrugia
TDTim R. Dargaville
Tim R. Dargaville
TBToby D. Brown
Toby D. Brown
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
A well-engineered scaffold for regenerative medicine, which is suitable to be translated from the bench to the bedside, combines inspired design, technical innovation and precise craftsmanship. Electrospinning and additive manufacturing are separate approaches to manufacturing scaffolds for a variety of tissue engineering applications. A need to accurately control the spatial distribution of pores within scaffolds has recently resulted in combining the two processing methods, to overcome shortfalls in each technology. This review describes where electrospinning and additive manufacturing are used together to generate new porous structures for biological applications.

1 August 2012 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CVCedryck Vaquette
Cedryck Vaquette
WFWei Fan
Wei Fan
Yin XiaoYin Xiao
Yin Xiao
SHStephen Hamlet
Stephen Hamlet
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
SISaso Ivanovski
Saso Ivanovski

29 June 2015 in Journal of Dental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FOF. Obregon
F. Obregon
CVCedryck Vaquette
Cedryck Vaquette
SIS. Ivanovski
S. Ivanovski
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Luiz BertassoniLuiz Bertassoni
Luiz Bertassoni
Craniofacial tissues are organized with complex 3-dimensional (3D) architectures. Mimicking such 3D complexity and the multicellular interactions naturally occurring in craniofacial structures represents one of the greatest challenges in regenerative dentistry. Three-dimensional bioprinting of tissues and biological structures has been proposed as a promising alternative to address some of these key challenges. It enables precise manufacture of various biomaterials with complex 3D architectures, while being compatible with multiple cell sources and being customizable to patient-specific needs. This review describes different 3D bioprinting methods and summarizes how different classes of biomaterials (polymer hydrogels, ceramics, composites, and cell aggregates) may be used for 3D biomanufacturing of scaffolds, as well as craniofacial tissue analogs. While the fabrication of scaffolds upon which cells attach, migrate, and proliferate is already in use, printing of all the components that form a tissue (living cells and matrix materials together) to produce tissue constructs is still in its early stages. In summary, this review seeks to highlight some of the key advantages of 3D bioprinting technology for the regeneration of craniofacial structures. Additionally, it stimulates progress on the development of strategies that will promote the translation of craniofacial tissue engineering from the laboratory bench to the chair side.

4 December 2013 in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Pedro CostaPedro Costa
Pedro Costa
CVCedryck Vaquette
Cedryck Vaquette
QZQiyi Zhang
Qiyi Zhang
RRRui M. Reis
Rui M. Reis
SISaso Ivanovski
Saso Ivanovski
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher

19 August 2014 in Journal of Dental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SIS. Ivanovski
S. Ivanovski
CVCedryck Vaquette
Cedryck Vaquette
SGStan Gronthos
Stan Gronthos
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Mark BartoldMark Bartold
Mark Bartold
For a successful clinical outcome, periodontal regeneration requires the coordinated response of multiple soft and hard tissues (periodontal ligament, gingiva, cementum, and bone) during the wound-healing process. Tissue-engineered constructs for regeneration of the periodontium must be of a complex 3-dimensional shape and adequate size and demonstrate biomechanical stability over time. A critical requirement is the ability to promote the formation of functional periodontal attachment between regenerated alveolar bone, and newly formed cementum on the root surface. This review outlines the current advances in multiphasic scaffold fabrication and how these scaffolds can be combined with cell- and growth factor–based approaches to form tissue-engineered constructs capable of recapitulating the complex temporal and spatial wound-healing events that will lead to predictable periodontal regeneration. This can be achieved through a variety of approaches, with promising strategies characterized by the use of scaffolds that can deliver and stabilize cells capable of cementogenesis onto the root surface, provide biomechanical cues that encourage perpendicular alignment of periodontal fibers to the root surface, and provide osteogenic cues and appropriate space to facilitate bone regeneration. Progress on the development of multiphasic constructs for periodontal tissue engineering is in the early stages of development, and these constructs need to be tested in large animal models and, ultimately, human clinical trials.