The progression of chronic liver disease differs by etiology. The aim of this study was to elucidate the difference in disease progression between chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by means of fibrosis markers, liver function, and hepatic tissue blood flow (TBF). Xenon computed tomography (Xe-CT) was performed in 139 patients with NAFLD and 152 patients with CHC (including liver cirrhosis (LC)). The cutoff values for fibrosis markers were compared between NAFLD and CHC, and correlations between hepatic TBF and liver function tests were examined at each fibrosis stage. The cutoff values for detection of the advanced fibrosis stage were lower in NAFLD than in CHC. Although portal venous TBF (PVTBF) correlated with liver function tests, PVTBF in initial LC caused by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH-LC) was significantly lower than that in hepatitis C virus (C-LC) (p = 0.014). Conversely, the liver function tests in NASH-LC were higher than those in C-LC (p < 0.05). It is important to recognize the difference between NAFLD and CHC. We concluded that changes in hepatic blood flow occurred during the earliest stage of hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD; therefore, patients with NAFLD need to be followed carefully.

Liver cirrhosis is the final stage of chronic liver disease (CLD) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Various complications such as portal hypertension, ascites retention, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome deeply affect patient outcome. The most common tools to predict the outcome of a CLD patient include the following: assessing severity of portal hypertension; scoring systems such as the model of end‐stage liver disease and Child–Pugh score and blood biomarkers related to complications and/or survival rate. In this article, we summarize recent studies of noninvasive markers for predicting impending complications related to CLD and discuss the clinical value of currently available blood biomarkers based on evidence from the literature. In addition, noninvasive blood biomarker assays for different prognostic functions were validated on 113 liver cirrhosis patients at our institution using Kaplan–Meier curve analysis to confirm that these markers can satisfactorily predict CLD‐related patient death.

Introduction Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, now known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is a phenotype of the metabolic syndrome in the liver and is clearly associated with metabolic abnormalities such as hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia. Although the prevalence of MASLD is increasing worldwide, there is currently no consensus on the efficacy and safety of the drugs used to treat MASLD/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator, was designed to have higher peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alfa (PPARα) agonist activity and selectivity than existing PPARα agonists, and in development trials, without increasing creatinine levels, lipid parameters and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were significantly improved. Thus, pemafibrate may effectively ameliorate the pathogenesis and metabolic abnormalities in MASLD/MASH. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in patients with MASLD/MASH. Methods and analysis This trial was designed as an open-label, three-arm, randomised controlled study. After obtaining informed consent, patients aged 20–80 years who met the selection criteria were enrolled. Patients were randomised to receive pemafibrate 0.4 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day or fenofibrate (n=120 per group). The duration of treatment was 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in ALT levels after 24 weeks of administration. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in liver fibrosis markers (fibrosis-4 index, type IV collagen 7s, enhanced liver fibrosis and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer) at 48 weeks as well as changes in liver fat mass and liver stiffness measured by MRI and ultrasound (US) at centres equipped with MRI and US capabilities. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the Yokohama City University Certified Institutional Review Board before participant enrolment (CRB20-014). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals and the key findings will be presented at international scientific conferences. Participants wishing to understand the results of this study will be contacted directly on data publication. Trial registration number This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (number: jRCTs031200280). Protocol version V.1.9, 23 November 2023