Barry Gardiner

Dr. Barry Gardiner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2017 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBEckehard G. Brockerhoff
Eckehard G. Brockerhoff
LBLuc Barbaro
Luc Barbaro
XCXxx Castagneyrol
Xxx Castagneyrol
DFDavid I. Forrester
David I. Forrester
BGBarry Gardiner
Barry Gardiner
HJHervé Jactel
Hervé Jactel
Forests are critical habitats for biodiversity and they are also essential for the provision of a wide range of ecosystem services that are important to human well-being. There is increasing evidence that biodiversity contributes to forest ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Here we provide a review of forest ecosystem services including biomass production, habitat provisioning services, pollination, seed dispersal, resistance to wind storms, fire regulation and mitigation, pest regulation of native and invading insects, carbon sequestration, and cultural ecosystem services, in relation to forest type, structure and diversity. We also consider relationships between forest biodiversity and multifunctionality, and trade-offs among ecosystem services. We compare the concepts of ecosystem processes, functions and services to clarify their definitions. Our review of published studies indicates a lack of empirical studies that establish quantitative and causal relationships between forest biodiversity and many important ecosystem services. The literature is highly skewed; studies on provisioning of nutrition and energy, and on cultural services, delivered by mixed-species forests are under-represented. Planted forests offer ample opportunity for optimising their composition and diversity because replanting after harvesting is a recurring process. Planting mixed-species forests should be given more consideration as they are likely to provide a wider range of ecosystem services within the forest and for adjacent land uses. This review also serves as the introduction to this special issue of Biodiversity and Conservation on various aspects of forest biodiversity and ecosystem services.

1 April 2016 in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBarry Gardiner
Barry Gardiner
PBPeter Berry
Peter Berry
BMBruno Moulia
Bruno Moulia

12 December 2022 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMarco Patacca
Marco Patacca
MLMarcus Lindner
Marcus Lindner
Manuel Esteban Lucas-BorjaManuel Esteban Lucas-Borja
Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja
TCThomas Cordonnier
Thomas Cordonnier
GFGal Fidej
Gal Fidej
MSMart-Jan Schelhaas
Mart-Jan Schelhaas
Over the last decades, the natural disturbance is increasingly putting pressure on European forests. Shifts in disturbance regimes may compromise forest functioning and the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services to society, including their climate change mitigation potential. Although forests are central to many European policies, we lack the long‐term empirical data needed for thoroughly understanding disturbance dynamics, modeling them, and developing adaptive management strategies. Here, we present a unique database of >170,000 records of ground‐based natural disturbance observations in European forests from 1950 to 2019. Reported data confirm a significant increase in forest disturbance in 34 European countries, causing on an average of 43.8 million m3 of disturbed timber volume per year over the 70‐year study period. This value is likely a conservative estimate due to under‐reporting, especially of small‐scale disturbances. We used machine learning techniques for assessing the magnitude of unreported disturbances, which are estimated to be between 8.6 and 18.3 million m3/year. In the last 20 years, disturbances on average accounted for 16% of the mean annual harvest in Europe. Wind was the most important disturbance agent over the study period (46% of total damage), followed by fire (24%) and bark beetles (17%). Bark beetle disturbance doubled its share of the total damage in the last 20 years. Forest disturbances can profoundly impact ecosystem services (e.g., climate change mitigation), affect regional forest resource provisioning and consequently disrupt long‐term management planning objectives and timber markets. We conclude that adaptation to changing disturbance regimes must be placed at the core of the European forest management and policy debate. Furthermore, a coherent and homogeneous monitoring system of natural disturbances is urgently needed in Europe, to better observe and respond to the ongoing changes in forest disturbance regimes.

4 July 2017 in Current Forestry Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HJHervé Jactel
Hervé Jactel
JBJürgen Bauhus
Jürgen Bauhus
JBJohanna Boberg
Johanna Boberg
DBDamien Bonal
Damien Bonal
XCXxx Castagneyrol
Xxx Castagneyrol
EBEckehard G. Brockerhoff
Eckehard G. Brockerhoff

1 May 2000 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBarry Gardiner
Barry Gardiner
HPHeli Peltola
Heli Peltola
SKSeppo Kellomäki
Seppo Kellomäki

19 June 2008 in Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBarry Gardiner
Barry Gardiner
KBKen Byrne
Ken Byrne
SHSophie Hale
Sophie Hale
KKKana Kamimura
Kana Kamimura
SMStephen J. Mitchell
Stephen J. Mitchell
Jean-Claude RuelJean-Claude Ruel
Jean-Claude Ruel
This paper reviews the current status of mechanistic models for wind damage risk assessment, describing model structure, applicability, validation and current limitations. We focus particularly on the hybrid mechanistic/empirical models GALES and HWIND, which have been designed for calculating wind damage risk at the stand level within uniform forests and which are the most widely adopted models within the research community. These models have been integrated with different methods for predicting the local wind climate in order to calculate the probability of wind damage in a number of different countries. We also discuss ongoing modelling work and proposals for future development in order to deal with complex forest structures and to predict the wind damage risk of individual trees within stands through the integration of mechanistic risk models with forest growth and yield models within a geographical information system framework. This kind of model integration will enable spatial representation of tree lists and damage propagation and allow managers to evaluate the effect of different harvesting and thinning scenarios on the risk of windthrow of both stands and individual trees within a stand.