Zhengchao Chen

Dr. Zhengchao Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZCZhengchao Chen
Zhengchao Chen
Bing ZhangBing Zhang
Bing Zhang
YHYongshun Han
Yongshun Han
ZZZhengli Zuo
Zhengli Zuo
XZXiaoyong Zhang
Xiaoyong Zhang
Landslides, like other natural hazards, such as avalanches, floods, and debris flows, may result in a lot of property damage and human casualties. The volume of landslide deposits is a key parameter for landslide studies and disaster relief. Using remote sensing and digital terrain model (DTM) data, this paper analyzes errors that can occur in calculating landslide volumes using conventional models. To improve existing models, the mechanisms and laws governing the material deposited by landslides are studied and then the mass balance principle and mass balance line are defined. Based on these ideas, a novel and improved model (Mass Balance Model, MBM) is proposed. By using a parameter called the “height adaptor”, MBM translates the volume calculation into an automatic search for the mass balance line within the scope of the landslide. Due to the use of mass balance constraints and the height adaptor, MBM is much more effective and reliable. A test of MBM was carried out for the case of a typical landslide, triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake of 12 May 2008.

18 February 2014 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZCZhengchao Chen
Zhengchao Chen
Bing ZhangBing Zhang
Bing Zhang
HZHao Zhang
Hao Zhang
WZWenjuan Zhang
Wenjuan Zhang
For on-orbit calibration of the Beijing-1 multispectral imagers (Beijing-1/MS), a field calibration campaign was performed at the Dunhuang calibration site during September and October of 2008. Based on the in situ data and images from Beijing-1 and Terra/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), three vicarious calibration methods (i.e., reflectance-based, irradiance-based, and cross-calibration) were used to calculate the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance of Beijing-1. An analysis was then performed to determine or identify systematic and accidental errors, and the overall uncertainty was assessed for each individual method. The findings show that the reflectance-based method has an uncertainty of more than 10% if the aerosol optical depth (AOD) exceeds 0.2. The cross-calibration method is able to reach an error level within 7% if the images are selected carefully. The final calibration coefficients were derived from the irradiance-based data for 6 September 2008, with an uncertainty estimated to be less than 5%.

26 January 2014 in Journal of Mountain Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YHYongshun Han
Yongshun Han
SDShao-Kun Dong
Shao-Kun Dong
ZCZhengchao Chen
Zhengchao Chen
KHKai-Heng Hu
Kai-Heng Hu
FSFeng-Huan Su
Feng-Huan Su
PHPeng Huang
Peng Huang