Tumor immunotherapy exerts its anti-tumor effects by stimulating and enhancing immune responses of the body. It has become another important modality of anti-tumor therapy with significant clinical efficacy and advantages compared to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy. Although various kinds of tumor immunotherapeutic drugs have emerged, the challenges faced in the delivery of these drugs, such as poor tumor permeability and low tumor cell uptake rate, had prevented their widespread application. Recently, nanomaterials had emerged as a means for treatment of different diseases due to their targeting properties, biocompatibility and functionalities. Moreover, nanomaterials possess various characteristics that overcome the defects of traditional tumor immunotherapy, such as large drug loading capacity, precise tumor targeting and easy modification, thus leading to their wide application in tumor immunotherapy. There are two main classes of novel nanoparticles mentioned in this review: organic (polymeric nanomaterials, liposomes and lipid nanoparticles) and inorganic (non-metallic nanomaterials and metallic nanomaterials). Besides, the fabrication method for nanoparticles, Nanoemulsions, was also introduced. In summary, this review article mainly discussed the research progress of tumor immunotherapy based on nanomaterials in the past few years and offers a theoretical basis for exploring novel tumor immunotherapy strategies in the future.

Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are essential molecules that are key in modulating immune responses. PD-L1 is constitutively expressed on various immune cells, epithelial cells, and cancer cells, where it functions as a co-stimulatory molecule capable of impairing T-cell mediated immune responses. Upon binding to PD-1 on activated T-cells, the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction triggers signaling pathways that can induce T-cell apoptosis or anergy, thereby facilitating the immune escape of tumors. In urological cancers, including bladder cancer (BCa), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and prostate cancer (PCa), the upregulation of PD-L1 has been demonstrated. It is linked to poor prognosis and enhanced tumor immune evasion. Recent studies have highlighted the significant role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in the immune escape mechanisms of urological cancers. The interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1 on T-cells further contributes to immunosuppression by inhibiting T-cell activation and proliferation. Clinical applications of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in treating advanced urological cancers, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, resistance to these therapies, either intrinsic or acquired, remains a significant challenge. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in urological cancers. We summarize the regulatory mechanism underlying PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and activity, including genetic, epigenetic, post-transcriptional, and post-translational modifications. Additionally, we discuss current clinical research on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, their therapeutic potential, and the challenges associated with resistance. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing new strategies to overcome therapeutic limitations and enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may play a vital role in a variety of biological processes, including cartilage regeneration. However, few studies reported their potential in the development of osteoarthritis (OA) previously. In this study, we explored the biological roles and underlying mechanism of MSCs-EVs in OA. Results: Co-culture experiments revealed that MSCs-EVs could promote the expression of collagen type II alpha 1 chain (COL2A1), SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) and Aggrecan while negatively regulate the expression of chondrocyte hypertrophy markers matrix metallopeptidase 13 (MMP-13) and RUNX family transcription factor 2 (Runx2) in mouse chondrocytes in the OA model. Besides, the results of cell experiments indicated that MSCs-EVs could notably weaken the suppression of chondrocyte proliferation, migration and the promotion of chondrocyte apoptosis via interleukin1β (IL-1β) induction. In addition, MSCs-circHIPK3-EVs (EVs derived from MSCs overexpressing circHIPK3) considerably improved IL-1β-induced chondrocyte injury. Mechanistically, we elucidated that circHIPK3 could directly bind to miR-124-3p and subsequently elevate the expression of the target gene MYH9. Conclusion: The findings in our study demonstrated that EVs-circHIPK3 participated in MSCs-EVs-mediated chondrocyte proliferation and migration induction and in chondrocyte apoptosis inhibition via the miR-124-3p/MYH9 axis. This offers a promising novel cell-free therapy for treating OA. Graphic